MOTM

I tend to vote for a 2U-width type of LFO because :

- a Sync-Input is quite benificial ( for those delayed vibrato type of
modulations )

- CV inputs without an attenuator ( except those keyboard input -
1V/Oct - ones ) are somewhat anoying because You need a a pot from
elsewhere and start to use (CV-) mixers all over

- a HI/LO range switch is a good investment to keep the range to be
covered by the pot to an acceptable value

Gert

>From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>
>
>On paper I have the VCLFO designed. *Curently*, it is designed to be a 1U,
>single VCLFO as follows:
>
>4 controls
>--------------
>
>Initial Speed (from about 1 cylce in 20 seconds to 4Khz)
>CV Speed attenuator that is a reversing attenuator (ie increasing voltage
>makes it faster or slower than INITIAL)
>Shape: this is a symmetry control that effects all waveforms simultaneously.
>At 12:00 then everything is 50%.
>Output select: 4 position rotary switch: Sine, Tri, Ramp, and Pulse
>
>4 Jacks
>-----------
>
>CV Speed
>CV Shape
>OUT +
>OUT -
>
>1 LED: this is a special "analog" LED that continuously changes *colors* at
>the LFO rate. It does not
>"blink": it's always on. This is because blinking can introduce curent
>glitches that a VCO can pickup
>(can you say "ASM-1").
>
>Estimated price for this configuration: $99 kit $139 assembled.
>
>However, I can make this a 2U wide as follows:
>
>add a SHAPE attenuator (note that there is NOT on on the 1U)
>4 individual outputs (like the VCO)
>2 Speed CV inputs
>HI/LO range switch LO = 1 cycle in 1 minute to 900Hz HI as above
>
>Estimate price for this configuration (everything else same: LED, etc) is
>$135 kit $190 assembled
>
>Send in you vote/comments.
>
>Paul S.
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Share the wealth!
>http://www.ONElist.com
>Tell a friend about ONElist's 130,000 free e-mail communities!