Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-09 22:55 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 645 of 690 · 34488 messages matched

Something Weird

1999-11-01 by Tkacs, Ken

I m not sure what happened here, but I came into work this morning to check my Emails, and I notice several posted to this list from me that I had sent already

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: more module ideas to ponder

1999-11-01 by JWBarlow@xxx.xxx

... ... I agree about advocating innovation. But let me then play the part of the Angel for which I m so well suited! I believe a Shepard Function

Thread view Attachments: 0

Our Team

1999-11-01 by Paul Schreiber

Rather than berate the other vendors, just be glad that: 1) Jurgen Haible (JH to most of us on the DIY list) is a MOTM designer. He worked on the 410, the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: more module ideas to ponder

1999-11-01 by Elhardt@xxx.xxx

... scaled down version of a shepard function module ? .... if they ripped off the guy`s design, at the very least, uncredited, then as i said before, thats

Thread view Attachments: 0

Modular Synth Comparison Table

1999-11-01 by Fred Becker

I have compiled a table that lists every module put out by the major modular manufacturers. It is a work in progress at the moment, but if anyone would like a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Quick update

1999-11-01 by J. Larry Hendry

... Moog ... of ... I think this is because the IS NO metal. I think the wood is not needed if you have the right metal combination. However, wood is

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: more module ideas to ponder

1999-11-01 by J. Larry Hendry

As I write this (worked a full 13 hours at my day-gig) I see that someone else has already answered the which modules is it question. Looks like blatant

Thread view Attachments: 0

algorithmic computer control

1999-11-01 by JWBarlow@xxx.xxx

... I for one, would like to hear a detailed description of your algorithmic computer control devices, as this is an extremely important part of the way I use

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Quick update

1999-11-01 by JWBarlow@xxx.xxx

... I m sure I remember really liking the Leedy piece, but I don t think I have it. I also really like the Stockhausen pieces you mention as well as Hymnen

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: OT: Sally Ride

1999-10-31 by JWBarlow@xxx.xxx

... Yes! That Ray Davies! Yes it would be weird if true, he may have just put up some money though. And of course it might not be him at all. ... The film is

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Subotnick

1999-10-31 by DAVEVOSH@xxx.xxx

In a message dated 99-10-31 18:10:02 EST, you write: john, they may be old but the classics never go out of

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Subotnick

1999-10-31 by JWBarlow@xxx.xxx

... Yes, I generally like his strictly EM pieces (maybe his analog pieces if I were to think about it) more than the mixed medium pieces of instruments and EM.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Subotnick

1999-10-31 by improv@xxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)

... I m a huge fan of Subotnick s early works! He has a couple of CD reissues on Wergo, one compiles Silver Apples and Wild Bull , his two absolutely

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Quick update

1999-10-31 by JWBarlow@xxx.xxx

... Hey Larry! There s been a lot of talk about Subotnick on the list lately and I was wondering if you d ever heard of him? I ve always been sort of

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Thinking on Mixer

1999-10-31 by DAVEVOSH@xxx.xxx

In a message dated 99-10-31 02:25:04 EST, you write: i had been under the impression that there was a current producer of

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Thinking on Mixer

1999-10-31 by The Old Crow

... The thing is, to make the esoteric modules like waveform skewing modules pay off is to start with *good* basics. A CEM3340 VCO is a nice device, yes.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Thinking on Mixer (2nd try to post)

1999-10-31 by JWBarlow@xxx.xxx

The 420 actually had some heated discussion of what sort of inputs, and how many were available -- I was a big fat loud mouth (what s new) on having the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Thinking on Mixer

1999-10-31 by J. Larry Hendry

That s great. I think now s and c are gone and r is building from the old plans. BTW, this was not supposed to be an attack on r. I spoke to r

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: more module ideas to ponder

1999-10-31 by J. Larry Hendry

From: DAVEVOSH@aol.com john, could you resend your last modules to ponder posting - ? a twitchy finger caused me to accidently delete it unread!!!!!

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Thinking on Mixer

1999-10-31 by Elhardt@xxx.xxx

... pure engineering point of view, that is one of the best ways to hold down cost without compromising on the quality of parts. True, there are some

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Thinking on Mixer --> Fenix

1999-10-31 by Paul Schreiber

I had 1 day to examine the Fenix last fall, and here are my findings (*completely unbiased, of course*) 1) Uses 3-terminal 78xx/79xx voltage reulators. Sucks.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: more module ideas to ponder

1999-10-31 by J. Larry Hendry

... Me too, I apologize too for the abbr. Thanks to JB for beating me to getting you the information. Regarding the Synthfool site, spend some time looking

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Demographics

1999-10-31 by DAVEVOSH@xxx.xxx

In a message dated 99-10-30 23:51:30 EDT, you write: john, i may be the only analogist alive who has never even touched anything made by arp. just

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.