Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 84 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
2006-12-31 by manu@netbsd.org
... And the images are embedded in the mail and referenced with a cid: URL? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2006-12-31 by Fabien Tassin
... not usable for me. That matches at least a third of my business emails, including customers and suppliers. All seems to be company enforced sigs with logos
2006-12-30 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
Here is the latest snapshot: http://ftp.espci.fr/pub/milter-greylist/milter-greylist-3.1.3.tgz MD5 (milter-greylist-3.1.3.tgz) =
2006-12-29 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
Hello Here is a new developement snapshot: Developement snapshot (not for production!) milter-greylist-3.1.2.tgz. MD5 (milter-greylist-3.1.2.tgz) =
2006-12-26 by manu@netbsd.org
... I d like to use an OCR tool, but I m not tempted by spamassassin. My idea would be to have a stand-alone milter that scans the GIF and attach the scanned
2006-12-26 by manu@netbsd.org
... It can be interesting to mix that with other conditions in the ACL: accept big mail from some senders or to some addresses. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus
2006-12-26 by Joel Reicher
... No, not quite. What I have in mind is the effect of the following (but I wouldn t actually implement it this way) if (spf) foreach (i in spfRecord) if(i is
2006-12-25 by Fabien Tassin
... issue a warning (syslog) at compile time then swap and use like the previous one. ... not sure that this lines command is useful though as people often
2006-12-25 by manu@netbsd.org
... Update: http://ftp.Espci.fr/shadow/manu/dnsrbl2.diff -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2006-12-25 by manu@netbsd.org
... If I understand correctly your idea, you want to do this: if (spf) greylist (*, from, rcpt) else greylist (addr, from, rcpt) What happens if a spammert
2006-12-25 by Federico Giannici
... It looks at the direct and reverse DNS informations of the last relay. Here it is part of the documentation. I found very interesting and effective the
2006-12-25 by Joel Reicher
... OK, at least that addresses my concern for known mail farms, but the larger part of my concern is for *unknown* mail farms. When mail first arrives from
2006-12-25 by manu@netbsd.org
... The right way would be to use subnet matching. wildcard would become 0.0.0.0/0, and it would allow more complex setups. Can you test this patch (against
2006-12-25 by manu@netbsd.org
... How does it works? regexp paterns for dynamic hosts? DNSRBL? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2006-12-25 by manu@netbsd.org
... So you d want this, to whitelist example.net s mail farm: acl whitelist from /@example .net$/ spf -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
2006-12-25 by Federico Giannici
I find very limitative that the dnsrbl command require the EXACT IP to look for from the dnsrbl. If I want to make use of combined dnsrbl I m forced to use
2006-12-25 by Federico Giannici
I m new to this mailinglist so I don t know if this has already been proposed... Have you considered to implement the tests done by the BotNet plugin of
2006-12-24 by Joel Reicher
... Sorry, I must be missing something, because I really don t see the point of that. Why use SPF if you re going to enter the IP netblock by hand anyway? To
2006-12-24 by manu@netbsd.org
... Today, SPF whitelisting is global and apply to any message. If we include it in the ACL framework, you can use it in conjunction with other criterions,
2006-12-24 by Joel Reicher
... How would that be different from the current situation? I want to use SPF to deal with mail farms so that I don t have to enter them all by hand, but I
2006-12-24 by manu@netbsd.org
... The point about having SPF as an ACL clause is that you can use it with other clauses. You could decide to trust SPF for mail coming from a set of IP
2006-12-24 by Joel Reicher
... Sorry, I should have been making this point only with respect to SPF, so forget about the conf file syntax stuff I mentioned. I forgot about this obviously
2006-12-24 by Joel Reicher
... I m not sure if this has already been dealt with, but the mechanisms in 3.0 for dealing with mail farms by whitelisting them, be it based on IP or SPF,
2006-12-23 by manu@netbsd.org
... As of today you can do that by feeding a local DNSRBL and using it within milter-greylist. What s wrong withthis approach, and what would we win with
2006-12-23 by manu@netbsd.org
Here are the next planned features for the CVS version. Feel free to comment: 1) SMTP DATA stage ACL We now have (in CVS) dacl rules, for ACL evaluated after
2006-12-23 by reschauzier
... I have been giving autoblacklisting a lot of thought, so please allow me to give my ideas about this topic. Currently, I run a setup with a honeypot
2006-12-23 by manu@netbsd.org
... Is bad feedbacks a synonym for no time to implement it myself, but feel free to do it ? :-) ... Let s try to move forward on the autoblack idea: what
2006-12-23 by An.H.Nguyen
It looks like the final db dump was not executed after pkill milter-greylist. Is there a patch to fix this problem? Thanks, An Nguyen ... From: An.H.Nguyen To:
2006-12-22 by Fabien Tassin
... me too. look at the archives, I ve mentionned that some months ago, and even more. Look for autoblack. I ve received bad feedbacks from Manu so I planed to
2006-12-22 by Alan M. Evans
... I can respond to this, since it s a feature that I am very much interested in. In fact, this feature is the reason I subscribed to the group -- been
2006-12-22 by An.H.Nguyen
dumpfreq 28m actually to worked after the 2nd restart. Is there a way to dump db whenever greylist restarts so I don t have to adjust dumpfreq? Thanks, An
2006-12-22 by aNguyen
Right now I have to restart milter-greylist every 30 minutes so I set the dumpfreq to 29m. It works fine until greylist.db reached around 350 thousand records.
2006-12-22 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... No, this is not supported yet. This is a desirable feature, though. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
2006-12-22 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Update to the man page are welcome... ... Is milter-greylist of any interst for that? Just forward mail sent to the honneypot address to a program that
2006-12-22 by Fabien Tassin
... it cannot. 1 refers to the pattern matched (so to a ), not to the pattern to match (not to [^0-9] so neither K nor _ could match). e.g. with perl:
2006-12-22 by Matt Kettler
... Sorry, you re right. because of the back-reference, the non-digits must all be the same. That said, they can be _anything_ that isn t a digit, and then
2006-12-22 by reschauzier
... I must be missing something here; how does [0-9]+([^0-9])[0-9]+ 1[0-9]+ 1[0-9]+ pick up 1a4443K23_1 ? (See also http://www.fileformat.info/tool/regex.htm:
2006-12-22 by reschauzier
... sure ... Let s clarify with an example. 123456 is a valid hex number. From the looks of it, however, there is no way to tell whether this is just a 6 digit
2006-12-22 by Matt Kettler
... True, the back reference will also pick up: 1a4443K23_1 Which may or may not be desirable. IMHO, the extra overhead of using the back-references isn t
2006-12-22 by Techwolf
Is this a valid/working config option? # Give this a try if you enabled DNSRBL dnsrbl SORBS DUN dnsbl.sorbs.net 127.0.0.10 # And here is the access list acl
2006-12-22 by c.r.p.
... Which is why I m interested in a man page that spells out that blacklist does not do DISCARDing , and that it does not populate a table so that
2006-12-22 by Oliver Fromme
... Is it? $ host web307045.mail.mud.yahoo.com Host web307045.mail.mud.yahoo.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) I m also not too worried about greylisting Yahoo, but
2006-12-22 by reschauzier
... Good point, thank you! ... Unfortunately, it will also match web307045.mail.mud.yahoo.com, which is a very valid mailer. In order to reliably detect hex
2006-12-22 by robert_schmidli
... Duh. I didn t have extendedregex on. I have got these regexes now: /[0-9]+([^0-9])[0-9]+ 1[0-9]+ 1[0-9]+/
2006-12-22 by reschauzier
... Make sure you put the extendedregex line _before_ the lines defining the regular expressions. It turns out the extendedregex keyword is location sensitive,
2006-12-22 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
... That might be something to do with the local regexp library, since I am sure you did not forget the switch on the extendedregex option. Bests, Attila
2006-12-22 by Oliver Fromme
... I think the correct question to ask would be: What OS are you running? :-) Milter-greylist uses the regex functions from the libc of the OS. So if those
2006-12-22 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... regex code has not changed since 2.0 beta3: 21 months ago. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
2006-12-22 by robert_schmidli
... I m running 3.0 on gentoo linux.
2006-12-22 by reschauzier
... -, so it ... involving more ... will match ... The reason for the backreferences is names like 123x45x67x89, which do occur. At the same time, I don t want