Federico Giannici <giannici@...> wrote:
> I find very limitative that the "dnsrbl" command require the EXACT IP to
> look for from the dnsrbl. If I want to make use of combined dnsrbl I'm
> forced to use multiple commands.
>
> I patched to source to simply act if ANY IP is returned, but it would be
> much better to implement a real syntax for this. Maybe we could simply
> allow an asterisk ("*") or no IP at all to mean "every IP"?
The right way would be to use subnet matching. wildcard would become
0.0.0.0/0, and it would allow more complex setups.
Can you test this patch (against CVS)? It should do that.
http://ftp.Espci.fr/shadow/manu/dnsrbl.diff
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu@...Message
Re: [milter-greylist] IP wildcard for dnsrbl
2006-12-25 by manu@netbsd.org