Joel Reicher <joel@...> wrote: > > racl whitelist spf > > I'm not sure if this has already been dealt with, but the mechanisms > in 3.0 for dealing with mail farms by whitelisting them, be it based > on IP or SPF, seems a misfeature to me. There's no guarantee that just > because mail comes from a farm that it is not spam, and in fact > there's a good chance that an SPF-compliant source is not well-behaved... The point about having SPF as an ACL clause is that you can use it with other clauses. You could decide to trust SPF for mail coming from a set of IP netblocks, for instance. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@...
Message
Re: Handling mail farms (was Re: [milter-greylist] planned features, call for volunteers)
2006-12-24 by manu@netbsd.org