Re: [milter-greylist] greylist.conf
2009-02-10 by Michael Mansour
Hi, ... I have: -rw------- 1 smmsp smmsp 1422638 Feb 10 11:46 /var/milter-greylist/greylist.db Regards, Michael.
Messages
Browse messages
Page 45 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-4.1.11 is available
2009-02-09 by manu@netbsd.org
... Yes, I plan to branch this week. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: [~Disarmed~] Re: [milter-greylist] greylist.conf
2009-02-09 by manu@netbsd.org
... I get this error: socket mode 755 is not allowed, Use either 666, 660, or 600 Does 600 instead of 755 work? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-4.1.11 is available
2009-02-09 by Bill Levering
I have to agree (4.1 should become the standard install), I upgraded to 4.1 because there are some very desirable features not available in 4.0. Bill
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-4.1.11 is available
2009-02-09 by Greg Troxel
Changes since 4.1.10: Evaluate list clases in forward order (Rudy Eschauzier) Fix crashes on regex substring matches (Rudy Eschauzier) Are there plans for
Re: [~Disarmed~] Re: [milter-greylist] greylist.conf
2009-02-09 by Eduardo Casarero
... Now? In the default greylist.conf is this line dumpfile /var/milter-greylist/greylist.db 755 line 10 is 755 correct? because when i start
Re: [milter-greylist] greylist.conf
2009-02-09 by manu@netbsd.org
... Please post in text/plain -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
greylist.conf
2009-02-09 by Eduardo Casarero
In the default greylist.conf is this line dumpfile /var/milter-greylist/greylist.db 755 line 10 is 755 correct? because when i start milter-greylist i
milter-greylist-4.1.12 is available
2009-02-09 by manu@netbsd.org
And here is milter-greylist-4.1.12, which is just 4.1.11 with a build fix http://ftp.espci.fr/pub/milter-greylist/milter-greylist-4.1.12.tgz MD5
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-4.1.11 is available
2009-02-08 by Bill Levering
Ok, the latest cvs compiles without a problem. Bill
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-4.1.11 is available
2009-02-08 by manu@netbsd.org
... Ok, let s roll back this one and go with TAILQ_*, as Rudy just proposed. Do you have more success now (with latest CVS)? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus
Re: milter-greylist-4.1.11 is available
2009-02-08 by reschauzier
A patch to change from stailq to tailq: http://files.eschauzier.org/milter-greylist/sqtail-4.1.11.patch
Re: milter-greylist-4.1.11 is available
2009-02-08 by reschauzier
... The queue.h file on my system looks like http://gel.sourceforge.net/examples/queue_8h-source.php stailq is the single-linked list version of tailq (double
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-4.1.11 is available
2009-02-08 by Bill Levering
hmmm... gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Iyes/include -DUSE_CURL -I/usr/local/include - DUSE_GEOIP -DUSE_SPAMD -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -DUSE_DNSRBL -D_BSD_SOURCE - I. -I. -c
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-4.1.11 is available
2009-02-08 by manu@netbsd.org
... Rudy introduced STAILQ_* macros, which seems to be a fairly new beast. I fixed it in CVS. Can you check out the latest code and check if it builds? You
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-4.1.11 is available
2009-02-08 by Bill Levering
hmmm... seems like there is a typo somewhere: ./configure --enable-spamassassin --enable-dnsrbl --with-libGeoIP=/usr/ local --w ith-libcurl [root@vps
milter-greylist-4.1.11 is available
2009-02-08 by manu@netbsd.org
http://ftp.espci.fr/pub/milter-greylist/milter-greylist-4.1.11.tgz MD5 (milter-greylist-4.1.11.tgz) = 642317c9e686293e676bb5cddd1d0def Changes since 4.1.10:
Re: Milter-greylist-4.1.10 segfaults on regular expressions
2009-02-08 by reschauzier
... My pleasure. Please use Rudy Eschauzier.
Re: [milter-greylist] Two patches for milter-greylist-4.1.10
2009-02-08 by manu@netbsd.org
... Will be in 4.1.11 before the end of the day ... I am considering branching a new stable release before importing this intrusive change. Anyone has an
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Milter-greylist-4.1.10 segfaults on regular expressions
2009-02-08 by manu@netbsd.org
... (many fixes) Thank you for all the fixes. I will roll out 4.1.11 with it soon. What name do you want to apear in the ChangeLog for your contribution, by
Two patches for milter-greylist-4.1.10
2009-02-08 by reschauzier
Summarizing the two patches that I have made available for milter-greylist-4.1.10 recently: 1)
Re: Milter-greylist-4.1.10 segfaults on regular expressions
2009-02-08 by reschauzier
Allright, I got to the bottom of it. Turns out there is a real problem with the way 4.1.10 (and before) handles parenthesized substring matches in regular
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Milter-greylist-4.1.10 segfaults on regular expressions
2009-02-06 by Greg Troxel
... It s deprecated: http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/functions/bzero.html and removed in 1003.1-2008:
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Milter-greylist-4.1.10 segfaults on regular expressions
2009-02-05 by Oliver Fromme
... bzero() is POSIX, so portability should not be a concern. Don t get me wrong, I m not saying the code should be changed. I was really just wondering. Best
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Milter-greylist-4.1.10 segfaults on regular expressions
2009-02-05 by Greg Troxel
I was just wondering because bzero() s purpose is specifically to fill an area of memory with zeros. It saves a few bytes in the binary and a few cycles during
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Milter-greylist-4.1.10 segfaults on regular expressions
2009-02-05 by Oliver Fromme
... Well, there s no strong technical reason, of course. memset() is not wrong. I was just wondering because bzero() s purpose is specifically to fill an area
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Milter-greylist-4.1.10 segfaults on regular expressions
2009-02-05 by manu@netbsd.org
... Why should I? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Re: Milter-greylist-4.1.10 segfaults on regular expressions
2009-02-05 by Oliver Fromme
... Why don t you use bzero(), BTW? Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister:
Re: Milter-greylist-4.1.10 segfaults on regular expressions
2009-02-05 by reschauzier
... Yes, you are right. And in fact the problem has come back after setting nmatch to zero. The problem is the seg fault does not seem to be very predictable.
Re: [milter-greylist] Easier way to build whitelists?
2009-02-05 by manu@netbsd.org
... Exactly: Reschauzier is merging white and greylist. But your change will be smaller and likely to be less intrusive, so it would make sense to check it in
Re: [milter-greylist] Easier way to build whitelists?
2009-02-04 by Mark Walker
Or else maybe I misunderstood what you were saying. That we would be working on the same code base at the same time on different things? That s fine too.
Re: [milter-greylist] Easier way to build whitelists?
2009-02-04 by Mark Walker
I don t want to conflict with anybody. I ll take a look at sync.c and see what I can do, and post some code. If it conflicts or is redundant, it s no big
Re: [milter-greylist] Easier way to build whitelists?
2009-02-04 by manu@netbsd.org
... Look at sync.c:sync_server() You want to add a command here. Note that your work is likely to conflict with reschauzier s one. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Milter-greylist-4.1.10 segfaults on regular expressions
2009-02-04 by manu@netbsd.org
... I fear you have a problem with your compiler. The zero ing you did is three lines below this: memset(sr, 0, sizeof(*sr)); So the whole structure has
Re: [milter-greylist] Easier way to build whitelists?
2009-02-04 by Mark Walker
Sure, I d love to. I m not sure what the inter MX sync protocol is, but I m definitely looking into it. I need to get the latest source working and then I ll
Re: Milter-greylist-4.1.10 segfaults on regular expressions
2009-02-04 by reschauzier
... Yes, this indeed turned out to be the case. It is fixed by setting sr- sr_nmatch to zero in smtp_reply_init(). I have uploaded a fix for v4.1.10:
Milter-greylist-4.1.10 segfaults on regular expressions
2009-02-04 by reschauzier
Milter-greylist-4.1.10 seems to have a problem with handling (extended) regular expressions. From the log: Feb 4 08:53:49 sun milter-greylist: regex
Re: [milter-greylist] Easier way to build whitelists?
2009-02-04 by manu@netbsd.org
... I had such a beast working for years, now. My milter-greylist setup fetches per-user settings from a LDAP directory, and I have a web app for users to
Re: [milter-greylist] Easier way to build whitelists?
2009-02-04 by manu@netbsd.org
... The inter MX sync protocol could be easily enhanced to do that. Are you willing to work on it? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
Re: [milter-greylist] Easier way to build whitelists?
2009-02-04 by manu@netbsd.org
... We have a nice feature for catching wide-open SPF record: racl blacklist spf self will reject message if your own IP is in the SPF range for the domain of
Re: [milter-greylist] Easier way to build whitelists?
2009-02-04 by Dan Mahoney, System Admin
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Mark Walker wrote: Might I suggest doing something on the outbound or SMTP-authenticated mail, similar to anthony howe s milter-abook,
Re: [milter-greylist] Easier way to build whitelists?
2009-02-04 by Mark Walker
If I had my wish for a hook into mgl, I d want some sort of callback where I can implement a server to answer questions about whitelisting or denial. I
Re: [milter-greylist] Easier way to build whitelists?
2009-02-04 by Mark Walker
I think SPF would become very important for address and domain based whitelisting. For instance if people here whitelisted milter-greylist@yahoogroups.com,
Re: [milter-greylist] Easier way to build whitelists?
2009-02-04 by Michael Mansour
Hi, ... The easiest way would be to allow recipients to have access to a web page and add sender addresses themselves. The developer (Emmanuel) has a system in
Re: [milter-greylist] Easier way to build whitelists?
2009-02-04 by Bill Levering
JMHO, but I enabled spf about 2 months ago, and it appears that a much higher percentage of spammers are using SPF now. Yes, it alleviates the delay for valid
Easier way to build whitelists?
2009-02-04 by Mark Walker
I ve been requested by some people to have milter greylist automatically add address book names to its whitelist. Since I don t have access to client address
Re: [milter-greylist] S/MIME and PGP signed, crypted or both message whitelisting
2009-01-29 by Christian PELISSIER
... Sorry. The data stage I was speaking about was not the SMTP one and I should have to write the milter header stage . A few years ago (I hope it s always
Re: [milter-greylist] S/MIME and PGP signed, crypted or both message whitelisting
2009-01-29 by Michael Menge
... No, the milter header stage does not include the mail header. See http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2821.txt 3.3 So only IP, HELO/EHLO message, MAIL FROM and RCPT
Re: [milter-greylist] S/MIME and PGP signed, crypted or both message whitelisting
2009-01-29 by Kai Schaetzl
... A word of caution: as with any incoming headers these can easily be forged. e.g. if not greylisting signed messages by headers comes in wide- spread use
S/MIME and PGP signed, crypted or both message whitelisting
2009-01-29 by Christian PELISSIER
Is it possible for milter-greylist to skip greylisting for S/MIME or PGP signed, signed/crypted messages ? If not, implementation seems to be easy and could be