Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Multiple MX questions
2005-12-11 by manu@netbsd.org
... You can patch the milter to replace tempfail by success... -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Publicité subliminale: achetez ce livre!
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 110 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
2005-12-11 by manu@netbsd.org
... You can patch the milter to replace tempfail by success... -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Publicité subliminale: achetez ce livre!
2005-12-11 by Ugo Bellavance
... Sorry, I found it: firewall issue. server2 was blocking incoming connexions with iptables rules. But my question about the config file is still
2005-12-11 by Ugo Bellavance
Hi, I just implemented the multiple mx feature of milter-greylist on 4 servers, but I have a few questions: 1- Do I have to put all 4 mx servers in
2005-12-11 by Ugo Bellavance
... SpamAssassin (I use ... Got all that... In fact, I m surprised that you dont recall me from the MailScanner list ;). Thanks a lot for your help, I m using
2005-12-11 by Kai Schaetzl
Here s the diff against rc-suse.sh.in. From a short glimpse at milter-greylist.c and conf.c/h it looks like it should override. Maybe my deduction was wrong.
2005-12-11 by Kai Schaetzl
... I made my changes only to the deployed files not to the source. I should be able to provide a diff against the original or a changed init SuSE init script.
2005-12-10 by manu@netbsd.org
... Can you provide the patch for that? ... Probably. :-) ... It should. Do you contribute the fix? (that s an easy one) -- Emmanuel Dreyfus
2005-12-10 by Kai Schaetzl
I can answer question 1 and 5 myself. 1. I assumed the milter was really getting started since the start script says so. Actually, after a restart it is dead.
2005-12-09 by Matt Kettler
... ... After-thought: The last 6 of those stats assume you re using SpamAssassin (I use it via mailscanner, but it should work via spamd too)
2005-12-09 by Kai Schaetzl
I installed milter-greylist about a week or so ago on a low-volume production machine (SuSE 9.0) for testing and am very satisfied overall. It just looks like
2005-12-09 by Matt Kettler
... The time distribution I did using a direct grep on the logs. grep X-Greylist: Delayed for /var/log/maillog | cut -d -f 12- | sort -n -k 3 The rest is
2005-12-09 by Bill Levering
smtp auth is working, but yes, I didn t add the internal address. I ve asked to get a list of to/from addresses from customers. Another thing we do know of as
2005-12-09 by Dennis Willson
Looks like you haven t setup smtp auth for your users or you didn t include your internal addresses in the whitelist, or both.
2005-12-08 by Bill Levering
I ve encountered this problem... but with only one domain. Recently I set up milter on a moderately busy server, and customers are complaining about the
2005-12-08 by Ugo Bellavance
... so my ... to collect ... ungreylisted ... info comes ... mail, so ... Would you mind sharing the script you re using to get those stats? I am using
2005-12-08 by Ugo Bellavance
... Ok. I ll try do something, but I just discovered that there is indeed a part on RC scripts. Thanks for the mini-howto
2005-12-08 by manu@netbsd.org
... cp README README.orig edit README diff -U2 README.orig README patch And send the patch file. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Le cahier de l admin BSD 2eme ed. est
2005-12-08 by Matt Kettler
... Right.. However most legitimate messages retry in 15 mins. Also, I don t greylist all my mail. I default to white, and selectively greylist, so my average
2005-12-08 by Matthias Scheler
... No, they wont. In my experience retry times are usually between 15 minutes and 1 hours. But there are servers which longer retry delays. Kind regards --
2005-12-08 by Ugo Bellavance
... I d gladly help, but I don t know how to write a patch...
2005-12-08 by manu@netbsd.org
... Can you propose a patch against README? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
2005-12-08 by manu@netbsd.org
... That s a desirable feature, but how to implement it? You see an outgoing mail (IP 192.0.2.1, from toto@example.net, titi@example.com) which matches the
2005-12-08 by Ugo Bellavance
... Spammers that send to you while its in learn mode. ... spammers that are ... same source ... same touple, ... Exactly. Or, at worse, they will be allowed
2005-12-07 by Matt Kettler
... True, but unless you re using lazyaw this would only apply to spammers that are using the same touple as previously seen. Such repeated use of the same
2005-12-07 by Dennis Willson
This would seem to also allow it to learn and allow all the Spammers that send to you while its in learn mode.
2005-12-07 by Ugo Bellavance
... particular sending ... auto-whitelists based ... systems with that ... Here is a message that is explaining the concept:
2005-12-07 by Matt Kettler
... Care to elaborate what exactly that does Ugo? Unless delays are introduced, there s no way of knowing if a particular sending IP ever retries, so there s
2005-12-07 by Ugo Bellavance
Hi, I know some implementations of greylisting allows for a learning mode , in which no delays are caused, and the database is populating itself as it sees
2005-12-06 by fredrik.pettai@vattenfall.com
Hi, This has just a little bit with milter-greylist to do, since it compiles fine by it self. I was thinking of testing/adding SPF to milter-greylist by
2005-12-02 by c.r.p.
ok, problem half solved. At issue was the line in sendmail.mc of define(`confINPUT_MAIL_FILTERS , `clamav-milter ) I changed it to
2005-12-02 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Look at the code and remove the test for the source address being , and you ll have that for any mail. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
2005-12-02 by fredrik.pettai@vattenfall.com
... Sorry, but i ve seemed to have missed this. How is this done (the patch thing)? Thanks, /P
2005-12-01 by Ken Serrine
... ah. well, one last attempt at the simple syntax possibility... I m not sure how picky the milter is about spaces and tabs in the conf file, so just to make
2005-12-01 by c.r.p.
... uncommented lines. ... sorry for the confusion, I was masking our IP. It came from: xx.yy.101.1/26 so you can change the maillog to read net
2005-12-01 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Wow, you started using it 15 months before I wrote version 1.0! (snip) ... You can delay milter-greylist decision until the DATA stage, which is not
2005-12-01 by Ken Serrine
In one of your previous posts, you showed the access list dump had: Nov 29 23:23:43 net milter-greylist: acl whitelist addr ... Where did the 10.49.201 come
2005-12-01 by c.r.p.
... hmm, I don t see anything amiss. Here are the uncommented lines: acl whitelist addr 127.0.0.0/8 acl whitelist addr xx.yy.101.1/26 acl whitelist rcpt
2005-12-01 by c.r.p.
... completely ... and make ... Just the one: /var/log]# locate greylist.conf /home/tngo/milter-greylist-2.0.2/greylist.conf
2005-12-01 by Steve Ladendorf
I have been using Milter-Greylist for about 3 years now and have never had a problem - until today that is.. We noticed recently that some of the FBI phishing
2005-12-01 by Ken Serrine
Also, check your greylist.conf carefully for syntax errors. Nothing will be read past a syntax error. For example, if you had a line like acl whilelist rcpt
2005-12-01 by Matt Kettler
... From the looks of that, it looks like milter-greylist is reading a completely different conf file than the one you re quoting above. Check around and make
2005-12-01 by c.r.p.
... INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clamav-milter ,`S=local:/var/clamav/clamav-milter.sock, ... here is what the maillog has for milter-greylist: Nov 29 23:23:43 net
2005-12-01 by Romain Kang
The new patch seems to be fine on my server. I made an adjustment to conf.h and added some more description to the README. Thanks, Romain ... +++ conf.h Wed
2005-11-30 by c.r.p.
... always ... Well , which one is it? They are not exactly saying the same thing:-) Anyway - ARGH! Where is the FAQ? Here is how I setup the sendmail.mc
2005-11-30 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Right, I overlooked that. Here is an updated patch with the documentation. If it s okay, I ll release the newer version with it. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus
2005-11-30 by Romain Kang
... The reference to drac is made through the .cf file, rather than the sendmail program itself. The .mc says something like this: LOCAL_CONFIG # dynamic
2005-11-30 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Could you grep sendmail source for DRAC usage? Just to be sure we are to open the file forever with a shared lock... -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
2005-11-30 by Romain Kang
... The only writer of the file is rpc.dracd. AFAIK, sendmail is the only other reader of dracd.db, though it seems likely that DB btree files are used for
2005-11-30 by BERTRAND Joël
... Are you sure your smtp auth is working ? I have the same configuration (with sendmail), and authentification was configured but it didn t work. Can you see
2005-11-30 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Do we have another software using DRAC? I d like to be sure that it s the right way. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org