Digital BW, The Print

I have gone through the archives and found your suggestion, Clayton, to set the alignment 
to a lower number, so I set it to #2 as you had. I am finding the dither pattern different, 
more horizontal now, but not really any better. 

any other suggestions? I'm losing my mind over this (not to mention ink/paper)!

Thank you,
Sarah

Hello Sarah,

>I have gone through the archives and found your suggestion, Clayton, 
>to set the alignment to a lower number, so I set it to #2 as you had. 
>I am finding the dither pattern different, more horizontal now, but 
>not really any better. 
>any other suggestions? I'm losing my mind over this (not to mention 
>ink/paper)!

I understand your frustration (been there, got the t-shirt and the
coffe mug).  I can't find any earlier posts in this topic, so I don't
know exactly what the problem is (there are two kinds of banding). 
Dither banding is very small banding that usually only shows up in
certain zones, ususlly dark ones around II or III.  I was never able
to totally get rid of this, but using the low alignment number
minimized it to where a glass was needed to see it.   Microbanding is
more noticeable and occurs everywhere regardless of zone.  This is
usually caused by a clogged nozzle.  Does your problem fit into either
of these?

Regards,
Clayton


Info on black and white digital printing at    
http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm

Hi Clayton..thanks for your reply.

I did a nozzle check and that doesn't appear to be the issue. What I'm seeing in the print is 
both a horizontal and vertical banding pattern in a large area of midtone, though I'm not 
seeing it in all areas.

I'm just stumped.


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones" <cj@...> wrote:

>
> Hello Sarah,
> 
> >I have gone through the archives and found your suggestion, Clayton, 
> >to set the alignment to a lower number, so I set it to #2 as you had. 
> >I am finding the dither pattern different, more horizontal now, but 
> >not really any better. 
> >any other suggestions? I'm losing my mind over this (not to mention 
> >ink/paper)!
> 
> I understand your frustration (been there, got the t-shirt and the
> coffe mug).  I can't find any earlier posts in this topic, so I don't
> know exactly what the problem is (there are two kinds of banding). 
> Dither banding is very small banding that usually only shows up in
> certain zones, ususlly dark ones around II or III.  I was never able
> to totally get rid of this, but using the low alignment number
> minimized it to where a glass was needed to see it.   Microbanding is
> more noticeable and occurs everywhere regardless of zone.  This is
> usually caused by a clogged nozzle.  Does your problem fit into either
> of these?
> 
> Regards,
> Clayton
> 
> 
> Info on black and white digital printing at    
> http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
>

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "sagaface" <sagaface@...> wrote:
>
> I did a nozzle check and that doesn't appear to be the issue. What I'm seeing in the print is 
> both a horizontal and vertical banding pattern in a large area of midtone, though I'm not 
> seeing it in all areas.

Sounds like the screen door effect from some odd resolution. What's the resolution of the 
image? Test by changing the resolution to 360 or 720 with resampling on.

Hi john...

...the resolution is 240. Do I use bicubic, smoother, or sharper to up-res?





--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "John Vitollo" <jvlist@...> wrote:
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "sagaface" <sagaface@> wrote:
> >
> > I did a nozzle check and that doesn't appear to be the issue. What I'm seeing in the 
print is 
> > both a horizontal and vertical banding pattern in a large area of midtone, though I'm 
not 
> > seeing it in all areas.
> 
> Sounds like the screen door effect from some odd resolution. What's the resolution of 
the 
> image? Test by changing the resolution to 360 or 720 with resampling on.
>

Sarah,

>I did a nozzle check and that doesn't appear to be the issue. What 
>I'm seeing in the print is both a horizontal and vertical banding 
>pattern in a large area of midtone, though I'm not seeing it in all 
>areas.

Hmmm...I've never seen or heard of such a thing.  It might be
something in the image that a res change might fix, as John suggested.
 Does it do it with other images?

Regards,
Clayton


Info on black and white digital printing at    
http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm

>  Does it do it with other images?

Well, there's the rub. Sometimes it does and sometimes it doesn't. I used to think it 
happened when I did too much post-processing (I tend to take normally exposed images 
and add a lot of contrast with curves), but I did very little to this image and it doesn't make 
sense to me that only part of the image shows this pattern (Half of a nude woman...the 
other half looks fine...same tones.).  A previous image was worked up much more and 
printed flawlessly in BO. So anyway, I'm trying the up-res right now and will let you know if 
it helps. Crossing my fingers.




--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones" <cj@...> wrote:

>
> Sarah,
> 
> >I did a nozzle check and that doesn't appear to be the issue. What 
> >I'm seeing in the print is both a horizontal and vertical banding 
> >pattern in a large area of midtone, though I'm not seeing it in all 
> >areas.
> 
> Hmmm...I've never seen or heard of such a thing.  It might be
> something in the image that a res change might fix, as John suggested.
>  Does it do it with other images?
> 
> Regards,
> Clayton
> 
> 
> Info on black and white digital printing at    
> http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
>

and it does indeed look like a screen door!




--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones" <cj@...> wrote:

>
> Sarah,
> 
> >I did a nozzle check and that doesn't appear to be the issue. What 
> >I'm seeing in the print is both a horizontal and vertical banding 
> >pattern in a large area of midtone, though I'm not seeing it in all 
> >areas.
> 
> Hmmm...I've never seen or heard of such a thing.  It might be
> something in the image that a res change might fix, as John suggested.
>  Does it do it with other images?
> 
> Regards,
> Clayton
> 
> 
> Info on black and white digital printing at    
> http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
>

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones" <cj@...> wrote:
>
> >I did a nozzle check and that doesn't appear to be the issue. What 
> >I'm seeing in the print is both a horizontal and vertical banding 
> >pattern in a large area of midtone, though I'm not seeing it in all 
> >areas.
> 
> Hmmm...I've never seen or heard of such a thing.  It might be
> something in the image that a res change might fix, as John suggested.
>  Does it do it with other images?
> Clayton

I've seen the horizontal and vertical banding with QTR but not with the Epson driver...but I 
have never printed Black Only so it might be a long shot. With QTR an image with a resolution 
of around 675+- will have that screening effect. Resample it to 720 image is fine. I think it's 
a bug in QTR.

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "sagaface" <sagaface@...> wrote:
>
> Hi john...
> 
> ...the resolution is 240. Do I use bicubic, smoother, or sharper to up-res?

Smoother!

okay...kindergaarten question:

I resampled to 720, and the image on my monitor took a jump. But in the print dialogue I 
assumed I would have to reduce the print size to fit the paper after that but nothing 
changed there. Am I missing something?


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@...m, "John Vitollo" <jvlist@...> wrote:
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones" <cj@> wrote:
> >
> > >I did a nozzle check and that doesn't appear to be the issue. What 
> > >I'm seeing in the print is both a horizontal and vertical banding 
> > >pattern in a large area of midtone, though I'm not seeing it in all 
> > >areas.
> > 
> > Hmmm...I've never seen or heard of such a thing.  It might be
> > something in the image that a res change might fix, as John suggested.
> >  Does it do it with other images?
> > Clayton
> 
> I've seen the horizontal and vertical banding with QTR but not with the Epson 
driver...but I 
> have never printed Black Only so it might be a long shot. With QTR an image with a 
resolution 
> of around 675+- will have that screening effect. Resample it to 720 image is fine. I 
think it's 
> a bug in QTR.
>

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "sagaface" <sagaface@...> wrote:
>
> okay...kindergaarten question:
> 
> I resampled to 720, and the image on my monitor took a jump. But in the print dialogue I 
> assumed I would have to reduce the print size to fit the paper after that but nothing 
> changed there. Am I missing something?

OK...since your image was 240 or so, go to 360...but make sure resample is on to keep same 
dimensions.

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "John Vitollo" <jvlist@...> wrote:
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "sagaface" <sagaface@> wrote:
> >
> > okay...kindergaarten question:
> > 
> > I resampled to 720, and the image on my monitor took a jump. But in the print dialogue 
I 
> > assumed I would have to reduce the print size to fit the paper after that but nothing 
> > changed there. Am I missing something?
> 
> OK...since your image was 240 or so, go to 360...but make sure resample is on to keep 
same 
> dimensions.


Sorry...getting sleepy....

OK again I see you did resample. When you resample only the resolution will change, not the 
physical dimension of the image.

I'm toasted. Been at this for hours. Will post tomorrow with results.

Thanks so much and goodnight!
Sarah




--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "John Vitollo" <jvlist@...> wrote:
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "sagaface" <sagaface@> wrote:
> >
> > okay...kindergaarten question:
> > 
> > I resampled to 720, and the image on my monitor took a jump. But in the print 
dialogue I 
> > assumed I would have to reduce the print size to fit the paper after that but nothing 
> > changed there. Am I missing something?
> 
> OK...since your image was 240 or so, go to 360...but make sure resample is on to keep 
same 
> dimensions.
>

side note: no banding with QTR and this image, but the blacks don't compare to BO, which 
is why I don't use QTR much. I ama huge BO printing fan and normally have no issues with 
it.

Sometimes this whole process is really discouraging. ~sigh~

on that pitiful note I'm off to sleep this round away.
Sarah


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "sagaface" <sagaface@...> wrote:
>
> I'm toasted. Been at this for hours. Will post tomorrow with results.
> 
> Thanks so much and goodnight!
> Sarah
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "John Vitollo" <jvlist@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "sagaface" <sagaface@> 
wrote:
> > >
> > > okay...kindergaarten question:
> > > 
> > > I resampled to 720, and the image on my monitor took a jump. But in the print 
> dialogue I 
> > > assumed I would have to reduce the print size to fit the paper after that but nothing 
> > > changed there. Am I missing something?
> > 
> > OK...since your image was 240 or so, go to 360...but make sure resample is on to 
keep 

> same 
> > dimensions.
> >
>

Well, no success with the up-res. I still can't correct that part of the image that has the 
"screen door effect". It is really puzzling and frustrating.

If anyone has any further suggestions I'd be much obliged. I hate to scrap this image 
becuase I can't print it satisfactorily.

Thank again,
Sarah




--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "sagaface" <sagaface@...> wrote:
>
> side note: no banding with QTR and this image, but the blacks don't compare to BO, 
which 
> is why I don't use QTR much. I ama huge BO printing fan and normally have no issues 
with 
> it.
> 
> Sometimes this whole process is really discouraging. ~sigh~
> 
> on that pitiful note I'm off to sleep this round away.
> Sarah
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "sagaface" <sagaface@> wrote:
> >
> > I'm toasted. Been at this for hours. Will post tomorrow with results.
> > 
> > Thanks so much and goodnight!
> > Sarah
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "John Vitollo" <jvlist@> 
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "sagaface" <sagaface@> 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > okay...kindergaarten question:
> > > > 
> > > > I resampled to 720, and the image on my monitor took a jump. But in the print 
> > dialogue I 
> > > > assumed I would have to reduce the print size to fit the paper after that but 
nothing 

> > > > changed there. Am I missing something?
> > > 
> > > OK...since your image was 240 or so, go to 360...but make sure resample is on to 
> keep 
> > same 
> > > dimensions.
> > >
> >
>

Sarah - is the "screen door" effect something you can see in the image on
the monitor if you look closely, or only something that shows up in the
print?

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Stephen Petegorsky 
<petegorsky@...> wrote:
>
> Sarah - is the "screen door" effect something you can see in the image on
> the monitor if you look closely, or only something that shows up in the
> print?

I'm wondering if it could be a working space issue? 

What working space are you using? CONVERT to a different one to see if it helps.

Sorry running out of ideas!

John - The reason I asked about whether or not she could see it on the
monitor is because from time to time, I have found a similar pattern that
looks like an larger "screen door" effect in the dark tones when using
certain sensors at higher ISO ratings.  Just a thought...

Sarah
This may be a silly suggestion but have you tried printing on different  
paper?  I noticed this myself a little while ago....  I know it probably  
*shouldn't* make the slightest difference - but it's easy to try and it  
eliminates one variable!
Good luck anyway - hope you got some rest!
Andy

Another silly question;

I haven't seen anyone ask the most obvious one, maybe I just missed it 
back there: are you printing Uni or Bidirectional? Even if you've been 
able to print bidiretional for most images, this one may be setting up 
an interference type pattern because of a previously un-noticeable 
amount of mis-registration between the outgoing and returning 
headsweeps. So if you haven't done so already, turn it off and see if 
that helps

Steven Karafyllakis

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, andy <andy@...> 
wrote:
>
> Sarah
> This may be a silly suggestion but have you tried printing on 
different  
> paper?  I noticed this myself a little while ago....  I know it 
probably  
> *shouldn't* make the slightest difference - but it's easy to try and 
it  

> eliminates one variable!
> Good luck anyway - hope you got some rest!
> Andy
>

Hi All...and thank you so much for your suggestions. I don't know what I would do w/o 
this forum.

I seemed to have solved the problem, but I wish to heck I knew what did it. I did try 
another paper...same result. I also checked to see if there was evidence in the on-screen 
image...none. I did put a new Eboni cartidge in, though that was before the different paper 
and there was identical banding on that paper too. The other cartridge was brand new as 
well, so I don't know if maybe it wasn't sitting right or what. Or even if that what's did it. I 
also changed back to my usual wworking space, but I had been in that space when this 
was happening before, so not sure that had anything to do with it. I also reprocessed the 
raw image in a slightly different manner, but frankly, I doubt that was it. But who knows.

So your guess is as good as mine. I wish there had been a clear-cut resolution, becuase I 
have a feeling it will happen again. It has in the past. Just not this bad.

Thanks once again!
Sarah


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Steven Karafyllakis" 
<stevekphoto@...> wrote:

>
> Another silly question;
> 
> I haven't seen anyone ask the most obvious one, maybe I just missed it 
> back there: are you printing Uni or Bidirectional? Even if you've been 
> able to print bidiretional for most images, this one may be setting up 
> an interference type pattern because of a previously un-noticeable 
> amount of mis-registration between the outgoing and returning 
> headsweeps. So if you haven't done so already, turn it off and see if 
> that helps
> 
> Steven Karafyllakis
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, andy <andy@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Sarah
> > This may be a silly suggestion but have you tried printing on 
> different  
> > paper?  I noticed this myself a little while ago....  I know it 
> probably  
> > *shouldn't* make the slightest difference - but it's easy to try and 
> it  
> > eliminates one variable!
> > Good luck anyway - hope you got some rest!
> > Andy
> >
>

Hi!

Just thought I'd let you all know that I got three images in the August
issue of Black and White Photography Magazine. That's the British one, not
the american photography collector magazine. The front page of the magazine
and the three selected images are shown on my web-site:

http://daniel.staver.no

Although it's just a little entry in the reader section it's still the first
time any of my work is published, so I'm really excited about this!

I sent them twelve prints made with the 2100 and UT7 inkset, Paul Roark's
carbon curve on PremierArt Hotpress paper. After they selected three of the
images I sent them grayscale TIFF files. Seems like color management worked
very well as the magazine print match both what I see on my screen and on my
own prints very well.

--
Daniel Staver
http://daniel.staver.no

Congratulations.  I'll definitely buy a copy.

 

Paul

www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.paulroark.com/>  

 

 

  _____  

From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Daniel
Staver
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 7:18 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Images published in Black and White Photography
Magazine

 

Hi!

Just thought I'd let you all know that I got three images in the August
issue of Black and White Photography Magazine. That's the British one, not
the american photography collector magazine. The front page of the magazine
and the three selected images are shown on my web-site:

http://daniel. <http://daniel.staver.no> staver.no

Although it's just a little entry in the reader section it's still the first
time any of my work is published, so I'm really excited about this!

I sent them twelve prints made with the 2100 and UT7 inkset, Paul Roark's
carbon curve on PremierArt Hotpress paper. After they selected three of the
images I sent them grayscale TIFF files. Seems like color management worked
very well as the magazine print match both what I see on my screen and on my
own prints very well.

--
Daniel Staver
http://daniel. <http://daniel.staver.no> staver.no

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Great to hear about getting published!!

I thought the web pages a bit slow.

gar

  -----Original Message-----
  From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Daniel
Staver
  Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 8:18 AM
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Digital BW] Images published in Black and White Photography
Magazine


  Hi!

  Just thought I'd let you all know that I got three images in the August
  issue of Black and White Photography Magazine. That's the British one, not
  the american photography collector magazine. The front page of the
magazine
  and the three selected images are shown on my web-site:

  http://daniel.staver.no

  Although it's just a little entry in the reader section it's still the
first
  time any of my work is published, so I'm really excited about this!

  I sent them twelve prints made with the 2100 and UT7 inkset, Paul Roark's
  carbon curve on PremierArt Hotpress paper. After they selected three of
the
  images I sent them grayscale TIFF files. Seems like color management
worked
  very well as the magazine print match both what I see on my screen and on
my
  own prints very well.

  --
  Daniel Staver
  http://daniel.staver.no



  


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Daniel:
 
Great stuff!! congrats on being published, I remember that feeling. I could
not get your web site to bring up the images full, very slow so maybe you
are getting a ton of hits.

-------Original Message-------
 
From: Gary W. Weaver
Date: 7/25/2006 10:25:22 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Images published in Black and White Photography
Magazine
 
Great to hear about getting published!!

I thought the web pages a bit slow.

gar

-----Original Message-----
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Daniel
Staver
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 8:18 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Images published in Black and White Photography
Magazine

Hi!

Just thought I'd let you all know that I got three images in the August
issue of Black and White Photography Magazine. That's the British one, not
the american photography collector magazine. The front page of the
magazine
and the three selected images are shown on my web-site:

http://daniel.staver.no

Although it's just a little entry in the reader section it's still the
first
time any of my work is published, so I'm really excited about this!

I sent them twelve prints made with the 2100 and UT7 inkset, Paul Roark's
carbon curve on PremierArt Hotpress paper. After they selected three of
the
images I sent them grayscale TIFF files. Seems like color management
worked
very well as the magazine print match both what I see on my screen and on
my
own prints very well.

--
Daniel Staver
http://daniel.staver.no

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 
 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Thanks everyone!

I just made some adjustments to the site, it should run much faster now.

--
Daniel Staver
http://daniel.staver.no

Congratulations Daniel, 

Way to go.  Our local Barnes & Noble carries it so I'll have a look.

Regards,
Clayton


Info on black and white digital printing at    
http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm

It (your site) did run faster. But it takes the thumbs longer to load than
does the main image.

The clicked images do come-up on dial-up quickly.

gar

  -----Original Message-----
  From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Daniel
Staver
  Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 10:55 AM
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Images published in Black and White Photography
Magazine


  Thanks everyone!

  I just made some adjustments to the site, it should run much faster now.

  --
  Daniel Staver
  http://daniel.staver.no



  


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Daniel Staver" <daniel@...> 
wrote:
>
Congradulations Daniel!!! The first of many I'm sure after seeing your work. I especially 
love the clock!!! :-)

> Hi!
> 
> Just thought I'd let you all know that I got three images in the August
> issue of Black and White Photography Magazine. That's the British one, not
> the american photography collector magazine. The front page of the magazine
> and the three selected images are shown on my web-site:
> 
> http://daniel.staver.no
> 
> Although it's just a little entry in the reader section it's still the first
> time any of my work is published, so I'm really excited about this!
> 
> I sent them twelve prints made with the 2100 and UT7 inkset, Paul Roark's
> carbon curve on PremierArt Hotpress paper. After they selected three of the
> images I sent them grayscale TIFF files. Seems like color management worked
> very well as the magazine print match both what I see on my screen and on my
> own prints very well.
> 
> --
> Daniel Staver
> http://daniel.staver.no
>

Congratulations!
Mike J.

-----Original Message-----
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Daniel
Staver
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 9:18 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Images published in Black and White Photography
Magazine

Hi!

Just thought I'd let you all know that I got three images in the August
issue of Black and White Photography Magazine. That's the British one, not
the american photography collector magazine. The front page of the magazine
and the three selected images are shown on my web-site:

http://daniel.staver.no <http://daniel.staver.no>

Although it's just a little entry in the reader section it's still the first
time any of my work is published, so I'm really excited about this!

I sent them twelve prints made with the 2100 and UT7 inkset, Paul Roark's
carbon curve on PremierArt Hotpress paper. After they selected three of the
images I sent them grayscale TIFF files. Seems like color management worked
very well as the magazine print match both what I see on my screen and on my
own prints very well.

--
Daniel Staver
http://daniel.staver.no <http://daniel.staver.no>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Congratulations Daniel!!! I still love your print that I have 
hanging on my wall. Keep up the good work. I am probably going to 
make the complete switch away from the darkroom this fall. Things 
are going very well with my digital printing with the R2400 and 
EPSG....

Scott

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Daniel Staver" 
<daniel@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks everyone!
> 
> I just made some adjustments to the site, it should run much 
faster now.

> 
> --
> Daniel Staver
> http://daniel.staver.no
>

Daniel

Really exciting stuff man. Most sincere congratulations

Woody Spedden

----- Original Message ----
From: Mike Johnston <wpajohnson@...>
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 8:53:22 PM
Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Images published in Black and White Photography Magazine

                           Congratulations!
 Mike J.
 
 -----Original Message-----
 From: DigitalBlackandWhit eThePrint@ yahoogroups. com
 [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhit eThePrint@ yahoogroups. com]On Behalf Of Daniel
 Staver
 Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 9:18 AM
 To: DigitalBlackandWhit eThePrint@ yahoogroups. com
 Subject: [Digital BW] Images published in Black and White Photography
 Magazine
 
 Hi!
 
 Just thought I'd let you all know that I got three images in the August
 issue of Black and White Photography Magazine. That's the British one, not
 the american photography collector magazine. The front page of the magazine
 and the three selected images are shown on my web-site:
 
 http://daniel. staver.no <http://daniel. staver.no>
 
 Although it's just a little entry in the reader section it's still the first
 time any of my work is published, so I'm really excited about this!
 
 I sent them twelve prints made with the 2100 and UT7 inkset, Paul Roark's
 carbon curve on PremierArt Hotpress paper. After they selected three of the
 images I sent them grayscale TIFF files. Seems like color management worked
 very well as the magazine print match both what I see on my screen and on my
 own prints very well.
 
 --
 Daniel Staver
 http://daniel. staver.no <http://daniel. staver.no>
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
     
                       




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Powerful and beautiful Work!  Do more...
Michael Vendrell

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com

Great work Daniel. Couldn't have happened to a nicer guy and nice to 
see that someone who gives so much to the B&W community gets something 
nice happening back to him.

Let's try and hook up NEXT time I'm in Oslo, OK? All the best to Teo 
and Song.

David

Thanks so much everyone! I really appreciate all the good comments, both on
and off list. 

I'm encouraged by this and want to get my work shown in more places. I'm
preparing a portfolio for Lenswork, and I noticed there was a competition in
Black and White Photography that I could participate in. I'm also going to
hold a small exhibition in a local coffeeshop in october, which I really
look forward to. I'd like to try more magazines, but we just don't get that
many here in Norway, so I don't really know any others.

Any other things I could try?

--
Daniel Staver
http://daniel.staver.no

You might want to try Black and White Photography in the UK.

http://tinyurl.com/raxgo

They have a mix of traditional and digital.

Kent

--- Daniel Staver <daniel@...> wrote:

> Thanks so much everyone! I really appreciate all the good comments,
> both on
> and off list. 
> 
> I'm encouraged by this and want to get my work shown in more places.
> I'm
> preparing a portfolio for Lenswork, and I noticed there was a
> competition in
> Black and White Photography that I could participate in. I'm also
> going to
> hold a small exhibition in a local coffeeshop in october, which I
> really
> look forward to. I'd like to try more magazines, but we just don't
> get that
> many here in Norway, so I don't really know any others.
> 
> Any other things I could try?
> 
> --
> Daniel Staver
> http://daniel.staver.no
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other
> resources as they are often being updated.
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish
> to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting
> this same page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to
> keep them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
> flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed
> from the membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital
> B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be
> removed from the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group
> Owner and Moderators. See \ufffdGroup Topic, Rules and Guidelines\ufffd in the
> Files section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> 
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
> PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE
> \ufffdOWNER\ufffd AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL
> NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,
> CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
> DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE
> LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  \ufffdOWNER\ufffd AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE
> PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
> DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE
> DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR
> ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT
> OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv)
> ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com

Daniel,
Congratulations!  FYI - I was lucky[?] enough to have 2 of my pictures
chosen - from 72 submitted - for a Merit Award in the B&W Special Portfolio
issue.  Of course, I submitted 6 portfolios each with 12 images, so imagine
the thrill!  To the point, the single issue submissions were over by May so
the next opportunity will be in the portfolio contest. Try to keep your
portfolios quite narrow in scope with very similar style and subject matter
as my submissions were grouped by very general criteria.  The ones that were
chosen [pages 113-114] were of manequins in store windows in NYC and the
rest of the portfolio was other NYC images. I  was so excited by my being
published that I started a website - http://www.omages.com, to try to
capitalize on my newfound "success".
I also submitted a portfolio to Lenswork via their bonus gallery program on
Lenswork Extended [the CD version of the magazine with many extras -  a
fabulous vehicle for learning about and viewing content from Lenswork] and
am awaiting some response.  The editor of Lenswork - Brooks Jensen - waxes
poetically regarding making photographic art available to the masses, and he
has done that in many ways through his magazine and the Extended CD.  In
fact, he asked readers to participate in what he called "The Experiment",
where he allowed us to download some of his images, then shake them up in
Photoshop or other editing programs, and return them to the magazine.  They
were shown in the Extended issue for Lenswork 64, and again I was gratefully
surprised to have mine included in these submissions.
Next, I want to submit images to Camera Arts, and maybe Focus magazine,
though I think they want you to advertise in their mags along with
submissions, but I may be wrong about that.  I'm sure other members of this
group have more information.
Anyway, good luck!  I'm sure that your talent and persistence will reward
you in many ways.

Alan
http://www.omages.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]