thanks for getting back to me Aaron.
I am not happy though. This for me is a massive problem. I can't
use this box for alot of the music I plan to make over the next few
months due to this fact. All my arp bass lines are the type of
thing you would hear in sompthing like Devine's track "Native
Love". or the bass line in Donna summers, "I Feel Love". And for
me the thing that makes them so strong is that tight pulsing. It is
the arp bass sounds that drive thoes tracks and when they open up as
the XL does it sounds like sompthing is going wrong. It is not
musical. I would be happy to wait a couple of seconds or what ever
it would take for the patterns to load slower so the cpu could
handle the load with out creating flaws in the synth.
After a long wait for the new OS and the total lack of cash (still
paying off the xl)I have to wait and see how i feel in a couple of
months. But my heart is kinda sinking in my chest. Will i have to
stop using the XL for sequencing? I have spent a lot of time
getting comfortable with it, i don't even want to think about it.
And frankly switch to what? I rely like the way that this box it
set up. And besides from what i have read it seems to me that the
Roland 909 would be even worse in this respect but i have not tried
it for long enough to know this first hand.
All in all I love this XL7 and i wont be selling it due to the
wonderfull synth and front pannel but I think i may have to use
sompthing elts to sequence it.
I would love to know what you think about this Aaron, if you have
any advice for me i would love to know what you are thinking.
Mike G.
curiousproductions@...
--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, Aaron Eppolito <synthesis77@y...> wrote:
> When you hit enter, the processor has to devote some time to
loading
> the next sequence. This can cause notes with *very* short
envelopes to
> be a few milliseconds longer than normal. It's been described
as "it
> opens up a little bit". Most people usually have some longer
masking
> notes so it's not usually noticeable. However, minmalist stuff
tends
> to focus as much on the silence between notes as it does on the
notes
> themseleves (otherwise it wouldn't be called "minamalist" right?
=) so
> it can be heard more easily.
>
> Unfortunately, this is one of those inevitable tradeoffs in systems
> without infinite CPU (which is *every* system). The tradeoff here
> would be pattern loading time. You would be just as unhappy if you
> selected a pattern and it didn't play in time. We did adjust this
in
> some of the later releases to devote more CPU to the synth, making
this
> problem a bit less, so if you don't have the latest OS (1.32), you
> should get it.
>
> -Aaron
>
> --- erik_magrini@B... wrote:
> > I am still getting sloppy things happening when i press enter to
> > select the next pattern.
> >
> > I fell that this is not sompthing that is being looked at any
more
> > by the emu folks. I am rely courious to know if any one elts is
> > still getting this problem. I cant be the only one making
minimal
> > techno with this thing. So I feel that I am probibly not the
only
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > one.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
> http://webhosting.yahoo.com