aeon wrote: >> YMMV, but I found the arps sectin on the emu series to be thoroughly useless, >> unless you are interested in living through other people's musical ideas. >> They >> are more on the lines of melodies and solos in loop format than usable >> arpegiations. >> >> Programming your own is too time consuming to make it worth it. > > On the first point, it is true that if you want "regular" arps, then you > need to use something other than pattern mode. > > As to the second, I agree if you are programming from the front panel. > Editing the arps on my XL-1 with SoundDiver works OK, but it is still work. > > According to the SD developers, E-mu has not given them the information > needed to create a proper Command Station editor, which is a damn shame. aw, poot, that's what Michael Hadyn and folks have always said about modules that are long in coming. they still haven't done a Motif editor either - if they can make an EX5 editor, they can make one for the Motif. anyhoo back on subject my SoundDiver shows a rack module for the XL-7 and will download the patches and arps, but nothing else. hmmm. what i'm wondering is if MOTU Unisyn 2.0's XL-7 editor is up to snuff. i use Digital Performer 3.x these days, and Unisyn now supports all of my synths, at least on paper. the integration between DP and Unisyn is sublime, Logic/SoundDiver can only dream of approaching it. so - anyone have any experience using the XL-7 or similar editor in Unisyn? -- Bruddah Max Lord of the Dance
Message
Re: [xl7] Why Command?
2003-06-14 by Bruddah Max
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.