Yahoo Groups archive

Emu XL-7 & MP-7 User's Group

Index last updated: 2026-04-14 00:15 UTC

Message

Re: [xl7] Why Command?

2003-06-14 by Bruddah Max

aeon wrote:

>> YMMV, but I found the arps sectin on the emu series to be thoroughly useless,
>> unless you are interested in living through other people's musical ideas.
>> They
>> are more on the lines of melodies and solos in loop format than usable
>> arpegiations.
>> 
>> Programming your own is too time consuming to make it worth it.
> 
> On the first point, it is true that if you want "regular" arps, then you
> need to use something other than pattern mode.
> 
> As to the second, I agree if you are programming from the front panel.
> Editing the arps on my XL-1 with SoundDiver works OK, but it is still work.
> 
> According to the SD developers, E-mu has not given them the information
> needed to create a proper Command Station editor, which is a damn shame.

aw, poot, that's what Michael Hadyn and folks have always said about modules
that are long in coming. they still haven't done a Motif editor either - if
they can make an EX5 editor, they can make one for the Motif.

anyhoo back on subject my SoundDiver shows a rack module for the XL-7 and
will download the patches and arps, but nothing else. hmmm.

what i'm wondering is if MOTU Unisyn 2.0's XL-7 editor is up to snuff. i use
Digital Performer 3.x these days, and Unisyn now supports all of my synths,
at least on paper. the integration between DP and Unisyn is sublime,
Logic/SoundDiver can only dream of approaching it. so - anyone have any
experience using the XL-7 or similar editor in Unisyn?

-- 
Bruddah Max
Lord of the Dance

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.