Huh? You mean in order to fade in a megamixed placed new part on say track 16, I have to fade down the volume on the currently playing part on track 16 (no problem) then execute a megamix to bring in a new part onto track 16, and *at the split second after* I execute the megamix, cram down the volume on track 16 (hoping no one heard the loud blip of the track before I got to it) and then fade in? I would have hope, most reasonably and logically, that the current volume, mute, etc of track 16 in the currently playing pattern would be maintained upon the insertion via megamix of a new part into track 16. The MC505 was pretty solid in doing this and allowed for seamless and controlled fade ins and fade outs, etc.
I hope I am wrong about this. But still welcome the new features nonetheless. I hope to hear about what limitations made such a feature impossible to implement, or what BENEFIT not having this feature will be available, hence the design choice.
Ravi
----- Original Message -----
From: erik_magrini@...
To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: [xl7] The FAQ
>>I think all mutes are disregarded when selecting new tracks in X-MIX. If
the source or destination track is muted it doesn't matter. I don't think
you can do what you want, you'd need to rely on the volume pots as you
say. <<<
rEalm
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [xl7] The FAQ
2003-04-01 by Ravi Ivan Sharma