--- Jonathan El-Bizri <sserendipity@...> wrote: > Am I the only person who can't stand Roland's D/A converters? Every > Roland product I've ever heard has exactly the same Roland 'bedroom > tone'. >LOL. Are you sure it's the DACs and not that "32MB when converted to >16-bit linear" crap? I don't know what their proprietary wave data >format is, but it's something less than 16 bit data. I think they use >some sort of companding with like 12 bit samples or something, and then >"emphasize" it after the fact. > >All of their synths do this (as is evidenced by the disclamer on ALL of >their wave data sizes) so that might be what you're hearing. A good >test would be to listen to one of their samplers that really do 16-bit >linear (like the sampling section of the 909, not the synth voices). Well the VG-8 guitar modellers do it too. Maybe worse than anything else they've made; it's easier to tell than on a Rompler (when I first heard a 303, I thought it was the source material). So do the V-Drums, though it's not as bad - again, probably because of the nature of the samples - all percussion, and less tone. As far as I could tell (which wasn't very much, considering the audio quality), I could even hear it on the V-Synth demo posted at H-C. Still looks like a damn nice synth, though. I think the only piece of Roland gear I've used that I couldn't conclusively hear it on was the SP-808. It doesn't do any pitch manipulation - it's just sample playback. bIz
Message
Re: [xl7] Roland vs. E-mu Sounds
2003-01-29 by Jonathan El-Bizri
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.