I think the command station and one of these should do the trick: http://www.8thstreet.com/product.asp?ProductCode=6242&Category=Synthesizers I'd rather keep my 505 and divy up for the variphrase by itself. Especially since they dropped a bit of the functionality from the 909. I'm not worried about the 909 soundset, I allready have it on other gear. Andre -----Original Message----- From: Aaron Eppolito [mailto:synthesis77@...] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:21 PM To: xl7@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: Roland vs. E-mu Sounds --- Ravi Ivan Sharma <noision1@...> wrote: > On the roland you may have to apply a slicing procedure to a sample, Ahh. Got it. I did manage to get it to do that (but then it spewed the sample over 16 notes of the drummap, but there's probably a way around that). It was automatic (sort of) in that you set a transient threshold, above which it would slice the sample. Worked fine for a drumloop, not so great for instruments or vocals. For anyone who's wondering, it was almost exactly like the Motif's "audio sequencing". Kinda seems like the guys who design the variphrase stuff and the guys who design the groovebox stuff don't talk that much to each other... Guess we'll have to wait for the MC-13013 for the full time/pitch/formant variphrase stuff! -Aaron __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
RE: [xl7] Re: Roland vs. E-mu Sounds
2003-01-29 by Andre Lewis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.