So if I want a studio with a broad range of realistic and synth type sound, is it good to get both types of synths? I am really concerned with having the sound tdo the job than having too much equipment, as well as being able to completely express myself. My buddy has the MC-909, I plan on getting it as a part of the production studio, just because the variphrase sampler is awesome. However my expression also involves great reproduction of real instruments as well. So if anyone has anymore opinions of the sounds, I would greatly appreciate it. BTW, I thought Roland = Electronic and E-mu= real instruments... (8o) Mark --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, erik_magrini@B... wrote: > Emu - Electronic. > Roland - real instruments. > > Just my opinion of course, and that certainly does not mean they both > can't do it all well. > > rEalm > > > > > > "studio_6512 <studio6512@c...>" <studio6512 > 01/28/2003 11:38 AM > Please respond to xl7 > > > To: xl7@yahoogroups.com > cc: > Subject: [xl7] Roland vs. E-mu Sounds > > > Which one is better for real instrument sound reproduction, and which > one is better for electronic sounds? I am thinking of getting both to > accomplish both sides of the production house. thanks... > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: Roland vs. E-mu Sounds
2003-01-28 by studio_6512 <studio6512@cinense.org>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.