Yahoo Groups archive

Emu XL-7 & MP-7 User's Group

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:09 UTC

Message

Re: Roland vs. E-mu Sounds

2003-01-28 by studio_6512 <studio6512@cinense.org>

So if I want a studio with a broad range of realistic and synth type
sound, is it good to get both types of synths?  I am really concerned
with having the sound tdo the job than having too much equipment, as
well as being able to completely express myself.  My buddy has the
MC-909, I plan on getting it as a part of the production studio, just
because the variphrase sampler is awesome.  However my expression also
involves great reproduction of real instruments as well.  So if anyone
has anymore opinions of the sounds, I would greatly appreciate it.

BTW, I thought Roland = Electronic and E-mu= real instruments...

(8o)

Mark

--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, erik_magrini@B... wrote:
> Emu - Electronic.
> Roland - real instruments.
> 
> Just my opinion of course, and that certainly does not mean they
both 
> can't do it all well.
> 
> rEalm
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "studio_6512 <studio6512@c...>" <studio6512
> 01/28/2003 11:38 AM
> Please respond to xl7
> 
>  
>         To:     xl7@yahoogroups.com
>         cc: 
>         Subject:        [xl7] Roland vs. E-mu Sounds
> 
> 
> Which one is better for real instrument sound reproduction, and
which
> one is better for electronic sounds?  I am thinking of getting both
to
> accomplish both sides of the production house.  thanks...
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.