Yeah, a real bummer for sure. I was actually thinking of getting one when they were first announced so that I could use it live (I need sampling for this). But with no megamix (yet, maybe Jim's up to something) and only 64 poly still, it's not worth it. I was banging my head against the wall many times cursing the mc505's 64 poly, and that was with only mono waveforms! The polyphony is the biggest let down IMO. rEalm I agree with you that is sucks that they removed megamix. What were they thinking, removing the major function that set the mc505 apart from everyone else?! And it is too expensive yet. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [xl7] MC-909 lowdown
2002-11-20 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.