Emu XL-7 & MP-7 User's Group

I recieved an email from Emu, after asking quite a few questions 
directly to them.  The responses were "this has not been emplimented 
yet" etc.  not a promise, but a lead...

Just to clarify, again, i have few expectations, i am very happy with 
EMU.  I have been since I bought my first ORBIT...

--- In xl7@y..., erik_magrini@B... wrote:
> Thanx.
> 
> rEalm
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "Nick Rothwell" <nick@c...>
> 10/02/02 09:38 AM
> Please respond to xl7
> 
>  
>         To:     xl7@y...
>         cc: 
>         Subject:        Re: [xl7] rE:  EMU "supporting" their 
products
> 
> 
> > What bugs does everyone keep talking about?  I know Nick's Arp 
bug has 
> > been confirmed, but what other bugs is everyone so keen to see 
fixed?
> 
> There's a difference between confirmed, reproducible bugs and bugs
> which are subtle, debateable, not totally reproducible, or downright
> difficult to describe. My gut feeling is that there are a few 
lurkers
> of the latter kind, which I could track down with time (but I've 
been
> short of that lately).
> 
> Example: the sequencer timing is (for my purposes) sufficiently bad 
in
> some circumstances as to make it unusable. I can post millisecond
> timings, upload MP3's, whatever, but other people might not notice 
the
> timing problems, and this kind of performance problem is arguably 
not
> a functional bug anyway.
> 
> Example 2: in a recent live set, realtime control of the 
arpeggiation
> timing interval generated spurious notes. I consider this a bug, but
> it's going to be hard to track it down and describe the exact
> circumstances, which might well be due to race conditions. (I do 
have
> a recording of the set, so I will try to reproduce it.)
> 
> -- 
> 
>   nick rothwell -- composition, systems, performance -- 
http://www.cassiel.com
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> xl7-unsubscribe@y...
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/