> What bugs does everyone keep talking about? I know Nick's Arp bug has > been confirmed, but what other bugs is everyone so keen to see fixed? There's a difference between confirmed, reproducible bugs and bugs which are subtle, debateable, not totally reproducible, or downright difficult to describe. My gut feeling is that there are a few lurkers of the latter kind, which I could track down with time (but I've been short of that lately). Example: the sequencer timing is (for my purposes) sufficiently bad in some circumstances as to make it unusable. I can post millisecond timings, upload MP3's, whatever, but other people might not notice the timing problems, and this kind of performance problem is arguably not a functional bug anyway. Example 2: in a recent live set, realtime control of the arpeggiation timing interval generated spurious notes. I consider this a bug, but it's going to be hard to track it down and describe the exact circumstances, which might well be due to race conditions. (I do have a recording of the set, so I will try to reproduce it.) -- nick rothwell -- composition, systems, performance -- http://www.cassiel.com
Message
Re: [xl7] rE: EMU "supporting" their products
2002-10-02 by Nick Rothwell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.