its a personal subjective decision, computer vs.
hardware. IMO at this time there is not enought to make one shine so much over
the other in particular aspects to be able to predict or tell someone what is
better in that regard. I have both, but if pushed to choose, would ditch the
computer. But if forced to keep only a computer, would do fine . . .
.
----- Original Message -----From: Darren ESent: Friday, July 19, 2002 9:34 AMSubject: Re: [xl7] Re: Let's have some opinions!I haven't had many problems with mine other than the learning curve which is the same as any instrument I've bought.
As far as sound, even sounds from my instruments have needed to be enhanced with my software programs to make them sound better.
Nick Rothwell <nick@...> wrote:
> Yes, software is expensive but for the same amount as buying a Korg
> Triton, you could have a nice software sequencer with effects
> plugins, virtual instruments, and virtual samplers.
...but you might well face a battle getting it working properly,
you'll have latency issues, it doesn't (IMHO anyway) sound as nice as
dedicated hardware (yet, anyway) and you don't have a physical front
panel with knobs and sliders.
--
nick rothwell -- composition, systems, performance -- http://www.cassiel.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Darren E - Eb/No Studios
DJ Pro CD recordings
Audio Production & Mastering
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.