I guess we're kind of different. Personally I'll never use computers again, somehow I feel that working with hardware sequencers is more inspiering (that is for me) - but whatever works for you you should use =) //Nifflas --- In xl7@y..., "Jonathan El-Bizri" <sserendipity@n...> wrote: > > > >Of course a single XL-7 is not far as good as Reason, since Reason is > >a whole "virtual" hardware rack. > > > > This is neither here nor there. A toy is a toy is a toy. It's not like I'm > comparing it to a fender strat. They are both 'all in one' sequencizers. > > >But real synths like the XL-7 together with other synthesizers, > >samplers, mixers and effect proceesors in a real hardware rack is far > >better than Reason imho. That's why I prefer the XL-7. It's just a > >bit more expencive. > > A bit? Yes. But I've already got a 25 spaces of gear, 4 pedalboards and the > obligatiory bunch of miscellaneous crap in my 'stripped down' live rig :/ > > Besides, for me, the real strong point of Reason is it's more complete level > of interactivity, not the tones. From something that you control with a > mouse, no less :/ When I can figure out a way to control it from the XL-7, > or vice versa, that isn't too clunky, I think I'll be in heaven. > > >Also, real synths is more fun to bring to stage. > > Loads more fun. The last gig I did, the guys ahead of me took an hour and a > half to set up for sound check, for a 45 minutes set. Fortunately, I take 10 > minutes to bring my gear in, set up and sound check, or I wouldn't have been > able to play at all; they weren't halfway through breaking down when I > started :> > > bIz
Message
Re: Reason is the future.
2002-05-02 by nifflas
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.