Emu XL-7 & MP-7 User's Group

Thanks, I used the Protozoa as a reference since I know that sound 
well, but have only limited experience with the 2000.
I've seen Composer ROMs fopr sale but don't think I have ever seen 
the POP ROM for sale (unless it still inside a 2500).



--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "D. Clowers" <dclowerstx@y...> wrote:
>
> The piano sound on the Composer ROM is better for sure.  Most of the
> Proteus1 sounds on the Protozoa are pretty dated sounding, but the
> P2\Orchestral and P3\World sounds are good. Unless you need the
> Orchestral & World sounds, go with the Composer. Actually, look for
> the "Pop" ROM instead, it has the same sample set as the "Composer"
> but the presets are MUCH better. 
> 
> --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "bass_krazy" <bass_krazy@y...> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, new to this forum but have been peeking in from time to time.
> > I recently picked up a XL-7 (had a Mo'Phatt module) because I 
thought 
> > it would offer a very effective interface for tweaking the P2K 
engine.
> > I will say it really allws you to get into the P2K engine much 
better 
> > than the rack modules do.
> > I currently have the Phatt ROM in the XL as well and was going to 
add 
> > the Protozoa ROM which I am familiar with, but it looks like the 
> > Composer ROM is a better choice.
> > Any thoughts on wether the sound quality on the two ROMS is the 
same of 
> > does the Composer have a more polished sound (or maybe I should 
say 
> > modern) compared to the Protozoa?
> > Not actually thinking about the instruments themselves but just 
the 
> > elements of the instruments.
> > Example if I created a piano preset on the Composer and created a 
> > similar preset on the Protozoa would the ROMs have a different 
> > distinction to them or would it be pretty similar?
> > Again it's good to see a functional forum for the Commands, it's 
a 
> > pretty useful unit in many different ways.
> > 
> > :)
> >
>