Thats what i thought.. No global master volume on the pulse, so it would be a pain, but if i had too i would. Also its a bit dangerous as if something happened to jump right up in volume.. Maybe a special jack to jack that has attenuation in the plug do reduce the level is in order. That wouldnt be too hard to do. Cheers Gonz --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "steve_the_composer" <smw-mail@p...> wrote: > > Nope. The volume needs to be controlled from the external [incoming] > source. Too bad the waldorf doesn't have some sort of master or > global volume. It sounds like it would be a pain to have to edit > every patch. > > --Steve > > --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "gonzinigonz" <gonzini@f...> wrote: > > > > Is there a parameter somewhere that allows you to control the > volume > > of incomming audio that gets mixed back into the mains? (via the > sub > > ins) > > I found that it was far too hot to use. I tryed it with a waldorf > > pulse that doesnt have a master volume as its stored on a patch by > > patch basis. > > Volume was far too high when switching between un-edited patches :o > ( > > > > Cheers > > Gonz > > > > > > --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "steve_the_composer" <smw-mail@p...> > > wrote: > > > > > > You can also use the e-mu as a passive mixer for external > modules > > > using the return/send sub outs. The returned signals get added > to > > the > > > internal signal and come out the main outs. > > > > > > --Steve > > > > > > --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "malik" <malik_martin@h...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > NICE!! I''LL HAVE TO TRY THAT!! > > > > THANKS!
Message
Re: subouts?
2005-04-26 by gonzinigonz
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.