As a realtime sequencer, the RM1X has a couple of advantages over a
command station:
- first and foremost, "groove grid" editing (individually shift
time/gate/velocity for any of 16 beats, in realtime);
- easy switching between variations withing a pattern (in yamaha-
speak, that would be "patterns within a style");
- can have phrases of different lengths and time signatures playing
simultaneously;
- can replace a phrase on a given track while playing (this is what X-
Mix does on command stations, but it's even easier on Rm1x)
- Undo! ('nuff said)
What I don't like about RM1X's sequencer is that it must be stopped
to start/stop recording, and even to turn the metronome on/off.
Now the second part of this mini-review: sound. Command stations are
very well-specified synthesizers, Rm1X - anything but. As a synth,
Rm1X a is a complete toy, and doesn't stand a bit of competition with
a command station (I can elaborate, if anyone's interested). This is
a cold fact, you don't even need to hear either machine - just
compare the specs. Subjectively speaking, I think the Command
Stations sound awesome, and Rm1x sounds like shit.
That came out a bit harsh, but you get the drift :-)
Hope this helps,
Boris.
--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "lifeistheformofenergy"
<lifeistheformofenergy@y...> wrote:
>
> Hey everyone - upon doing a lot of reveiws and reading a lot of
other
> people's posts - there has been a lot of referrence to the Rm1x, I
am
> wondering what are everyones personal or particular consensus about
> the positives and negatives the Rm1x might have over the emu
command
> stations (if this is deemed so) and or vise versa ....
>
> Yamaha Rm1x : http://www.markarber.freeserve.co.uk/rmormc.htmMessage
Re: Emu and Yamaha
2005-02-06 by gutman75
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.