Use the best of both worlds i reckon.. I dont personally find a mouse and qwerty keyboard too interactive for making music. i still like hardware sequncers with big pads to bash and the like.. I also find that all the flash graphics a bit distracting and the monitor in my face a bit to much. Dont get me wrong though, you cant beat a graphical representation of midi data in a track. It is much easier that way to get right in there quickly. Also when the MPC is pumping, i havant heard a PC keep time like that yet.. Ive always had hardware, so thats why i guess. If your just starting out the PC route is proberly your cheapest option power vs cost. Just my 2 cents Gonz --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, Aaron Eppolito <synthesis77@y...> wrote: > LOL. This is sorta like posting "Ford Rules" on a Corvette mailing > list... > > --- Joey Morales <trackmuzik@y...> wrote: > > personally I'd stay away from the hardward sequencer. Would you like > > to strain while looking at a small usually colorless screen or a > > computer monitor??? > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Message
Re: Hola Folks
2004-07-07 by gonzinigonz
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.