Wiardgroup

Hi Mark
   all of the 300 series modules have a 'stand-alone voice' but if i
place myself, arbitrarily, in the situation you describe, i'd be
inclined to isolate the Wogglebug.

(i'd also remount it in a lucite dome and bend it photoresistors but
that's another story altogether!)

tgim,
-doc


--- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, Mark Griffiths <mark@...> wrote:
>
> hi there,
>  
> I've been looking at the patch sheet on the Wiard site. It shows the
Classic VCO, next to the Sequantizer, which is next to Envelator, then
comes the Waveform City, Filter and Mixolator. I was suprised to see
the Sequantizer and Envelator between the two oscillators, does anyone
know why?
>  
>  
> Second question which might be redundant deping on the reply to the
above. I have the Wiard rack frame which will take 6 modules. I have
7. I have 2 Osc, 1 Borg, 1 Sequantizer, 1 envelator and 1 mixolator
configuration, plus I have a Wooglebug. I was thinking of leaving the
Wogglebug as a "free module" partly because it feels complete in
itself, partly because I'm also using it on the Blacet/Wiard/Banalogue
Frac  rack. But I guess you could give similar arguments about the
Sequantizer. What would you do?

>  
>  
> regards, Mark
>

If you use the Classic VCO in low mode as a clock source, then all the waveforms from the 
Classic VCO, Sequantizer and Envelators will be in phase and make musical sense.

The timing of the pulse is taken from the sawtooth so only the back edge modulates with 
PWM, this makes sense musically. The random output from the Classic VCO updates on 
the raising edge of the pulse output, like a sample and hold module would.


--- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, Mark Griffiths <mark@...> wrote:
>
> hi there,
>  
> I've been looking at the patch sheet on the Wiard site. It shows the Classic VCO, next to 
the Sequantizer, which is next to Envelator, then comes the Waveform City, Filter and 
Mixolator. I was suprised to see the Sequantizer and Envelator between the two oscillators, 
does anyone know why?
>  
>  
> Second question which might be redundant deping on the reply to the above. I have the 
Wiard rack frame which will take 6 modules. I have 7. I have 2 Osc, 1 Borg, 1 Sequantizer, 
1 envelator and 1 mixolator configuration, plus I have a Wooglebug. I was thinking of 
leaving the Wogglebug as a "free module" partly because it feels complete in itself, partly 
because I'm also using it on the Blacet/Wiard/Banalogue Frac  rack. But I guess you could 
give similar arguments about the Sequantizer. What would you do?

>  
>  
> regards, Mark
>