Yahoo Groups archive

Wiardgroup

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:41 UTC

Message

Re: Two questions about module layout

2008-06-02 by drmabuce

Hi Mark
   all of the 300 series modules have a 'stand-alone voice' but if i
place myself, arbitrarily, in the situation you describe, i'd be
inclined to isolate the Wogglebug.

(i'd also remount it in a lucite dome and bend it photoresistors but
that's another story altogether!)

tgim,
-doc


--- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, Mark Griffiths <mark@...> wrote:
>
> hi there,
>  
> I've been looking at the patch sheet on the Wiard site. It shows the
Classic VCO, next to the Sequantizer, which is next to Envelator, then
comes the Waveform City, Filter and Mixolator. I was suprised to see
the Sequantizer and Envelator between the two oscillators, does anyone
know why?
>  
>  
> Second question which might be redundant deping on the reply to the
above. I have the Wiard rack frame which will take 6 modules. I have
7. I have 2 Osc, 1 Borg, 1 Sequantizer, 1 envelator and 1 mixolator
configuration, plus I have a Wooglebug. I was thinking of leaving the
Wogglebug as a "free module" partly because it feels complete in
itself, partly because I'm also using it on the Blacet/Wiard/Banalogue
Frac  rack. But I guess you could give similar arguments about the
Sequantizer. What would you do?
>  
>  
> regards, Mark
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.