Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Thread

New Power Supply Discussion

New Power Supply Discussion

2000-04-13 by Tkacs, Ken

Ideally, two different power supplies could be offered, going forward---the
current MOTM-900 designed to fit the SKB case dimensions, and perhaps a
MOTM-905 or something that caters to cabinet/console systems. For me, that
one would be best with a 1u panel for the power switch and some wire that
lets you mount the actual PS somewhere inside the cabinet. To the inner left
wall or whatever (I doubt anyone would put the power switch module in the
middle of their modules, but I guess you never know).

For ME, ideally, the power cord connector would be on a separate little
bezel that could be screwed to the back of the cabinet. Or perhaps on an
L-shaped panel so that it could be screwed to the bottom board. That way
those that don't put backs on still have it secured, and those that do need
only notch out a bit of the back to let it show through.

I really like the idea of a PS with the power cord in the rear---this is
much better for me---but I'd hate top see any MOTM module "retired."

(I'm thankful for the shallow depth of MOTM modules --- I like the
dimensions very much --- but I'm a little stumped as to why fitting the
system into an SKB portable case is the be-all end-all of modular
synthesizer packaging....? It seems to be a dire requirement, and I while
it's very cool that the modules can be packaged that way, I don't see why it
was a life or death industrial design restriction.)

RE: [motm] New Power Supply Discussion

2000-04-13 by David Bivins

> (I'm thankful for the shallow depth of MOTM modules --- I like the
> dimensions very much --- but I'm a little stumped as to why fitting the
> system into an SKB portable case is the be-all end-all of modular
> synthesizer packaging....? It seems to be a dire requirement, and I while
> it's very cool that the modules can be packaged that way, I don't
> see why it
> was a life or death industrial design restriction.)

Well, because I have one of these cases. That's the reason. I'm actually
blackmailing Paul, forcing him to adhere to MY standards :)

O.k., obviously I'm kidding.

But seriously, given the range of requirements of users, I think Ken's idea
(for the MOTM-905) is good, but I wonder why those who are building serious,
permanent cases aren't customizing the power supply configuration anyway?
Some of the early builders *had* to do this, or at least one of the Stooges
did, and I can't help but think that's ideal--then you can put everything
exactly where you want it. Just buy the PowerOne, the connectors, a
distribution board from Paul, etc. And you won't have to pay for a panel
you're not necessarily going to use. I know that if I were to build a case
today, I would be mounting the PSU in the rear, and most of the panel would
be covered anyway.

Just a thought.

David.

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.