> (I'm thankful for the shallow depth of MOTM modules --- I like the > dimensions very much --- but I'm a little stumped as to why fitting the > system into an SKB portable case is the be-all end-all of modular > synthesizer packaging....? It seems to be a dire requirement, and I while > it's very cool that the modules can be packaged that way, I don't > see why it > was a life or death industrial design restriction.) Well, because I have one of these cases. That's the reason. I'm actually blackmailing Paul, forcing him to adhere to MY standards :) O.k., obviously I'm kidding. But seriously, given the range of requirements of users, I think Ken's idea (for the MOTM-905) is good, but I wonder why those who are building serious, permanent cases aren't customizing the power supply configuration anyway? Some of the early builders *had* to do this, or at least one of the Stooges did, and I can't help but think that's ideal--then you can put everything exactly where you want it. Just buy the PowerOne, the connectors, a distribution board from Paul, etc. And you won't have to pay for a panel you're not necessarily going to use. I know that if I were to build a case today, I would be mounting the PSU in the rear, and most of the panel would be covered anyway. Just a thought. David.
Message
RE: [motm] New Power Supply Discussion
2000-04-13 by David Bivins
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.