Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Thread

RE: [motm] MOTM-820 VC Lag - Preview

RE: [motm] MOTM-820 VC Lag - Preview

2000-04-04 by Dave Bradley

Why you, I oughtta...

Look bub, when we talked about this design the first time, YOU proposed a
bicolored led and all kinds of stuff. Paul said the kit price would to have
to be $189 to build all that, remember?

I'll take a red led and $149 anytime!

Moe
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> -----Original Message-----
> From: J. Larry Hendry [mailto:jlarryh@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 9:21 AM
> To: motm@egroups.com
> Subject: Re: [motm] MOTM-820 VC Lag - Preview
>
>
> > From: Dave Bradley <daveb@...>
> > At any rate, the nasty red led will come
> > on when it's bypassed, so it should
> > be pretty evident what state it's in.
>
> You should prefer a teal green or slate blue to nasty red?  Hum, big boy?
>
> Larry (feeling very stoogy today) Hendry
>

RE: [motm] MOTM-820 VC Lag - Preview

2000-04-04 by Tkacs, Ken

What did your daughter do? Is she complaining about the LED too?

:)
Show quoted textHide quoted text
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Paul Schreiber [mailto:synth1@...] 
Sent:	Tuesday, 04 April, 2000 10:42 AM
To:	motm@egroups.com
Subject:	Re: [motm] MOTM-820 VC Lag - Preview    


Paul S.
14yr old daughter makes me crazy

Re: [motm] MOTM-820 VC Lag - Preview

2000-04-04 by J. Larry Hendry

> From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@...>
> OK all you knuckle-heads, listen up!

Hey !!  I resemble that remark !!

> 2) I don't want a bi-color LED because it adds $15 to
> the cost, 5 parts,and consumes power when not 
> bypassed. I'm guessing 99.99% of the time
> the VC lag will be used.

Well neither did I.  However, it is cool on the 320.  Some other Stooge
just couldn't remember how that last "LED" conversation ended. <snicker>

> So, when I'm playing the keyboard, a tap on the
> switch kicks the lag in and out. Think of damper
> pedal on a piano. FYI, this is how the GLIDE
> functions on a Minimoog.

I know this is supposed to be simple, so I'll try to keep it that way.  If
I understand, the lag is bypassed when the switch contact is made up.  So,
if a guy wanted to have "LAG" only when remote switch is depressed, he
would wire to his switches N.O. contact.  Someone wanting to "tap on" and
"tap off" would need a push-on / push-off switch.  The bypass is only
bypassed when the tip is actually shorted to ground.  Do I have that right?
 And for those guys that want to "clap-on" and "clap-off", like other
stooges I know, they will have to design their own circuits.
 
> 4) The switch is for lazy Stooges who don't want to
> rig up a footswitch.

Not me.  A foot switch rules.  I be riggin'.  I use that function all the
time in my Kenton.

> Paul S.
> 14yr old daughter makes me crazy

Crazier than us?

Larry H

Re: [motm] MOTM-820 VC Lag - Preview

2000-04-04 by davevosh@aol.com

In a message dated 00-04-04 10:13:36 EDT, you write:

<< No matter, it looks like a great module!  >>



ken,
it does sound like a solid addition to the line. if paul has covered all the 
bases in terms of the units functionality and done so with  motm precision, 
then it should be a powerful addition to any system.
best,
dave v.

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.