> From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@...> > OK all you knuckle-heads, listen up! Hey !! I resemble that remark !! > 2) I don't want a bi-color LED because it adds $15 to > the cost, 5 parts,and consumes power when not > bypassed. I'm guessing 99.99% of the time > the VC lag will be used. Well neither did I. However, it is cool on the 320. Some other Stooge just couldn't remember how that last "LED" conversation ended. <snicker> > So, when I'm playing the keyboard, a tap on the > switch kicks the lag in and out. Think of damper > pedal on a piano. FYI, this is how the GLIDE > functions on a Minimoog. I know this is supposed to be simple, so I'll try to keep it that way. If I understand, the lag is bypassed when the switch contact is made up. So, if a guy wanted to have "LAG" only when remote switch is depressed, he would wire to his switches N.O. contact. Someone wanting to "tap on" and "tap off" would need a push-on / push-off switch. The bypass is only bypassed when the tip is actually shorted to ground. Do I have that right? And for those guys that want to "clap-on" and "clap-off", like other stooges I know, they will have to design their own circuits. > 4) The switch is for lazy Stooges who don't want to > rig up a footswitch. Not me. A foot switch rules. I be riggin'. I use that function all the time in my Kenton. > Paul S. > 14yr old daughter makes me crazy Crazier than us? Larry H
Message
Re: [motm] MOTM-820 VC Lag - Preview
2000-04-04 by J. Larry Hendry
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.