RE: PaulBr's multiples
2000-01-26 by Dave Bradley
... Sure, I need more than 4 sometimes. Jack 2 4 wides together temporarily, and you ve got a 6 wide. Dave Bradley Principal Software Engineer Engineering
Messages
Browse messages
Page 626 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
RE: MOTM-300 Question
2000-01-26 by Tkacs, Ken
Amen, brother. ... From: thomas white [mailto:djthomaswhite@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 1:59 AM To: motm@onelist.com Subject: Re: [motm]
Sine Shape w/o Scope
2000-01-26 by Tkacs, Ken
I haven t needed to do this, but for those of you without an oscilloscope, you might consider this agonizing way of calibrating your sine shape. Once you have
Re: speculative modules
2000-01-26 by DAVEVOSH@aol.com
In a message dated 00-01-23 20:25:25 EST, you write:
Re: Off to the frozen North I go!
2000-01-26 by DAVEVOSH@aol.com
In a message dated 00-01-23 17:44:12 EST, you write: paul, sorry, my cat sat on my mouse and set mail unfinished. to continue :
Re: Off to the frozen North I go!
2000-01-26 by DAVEVOSH@aol.com
In a message dated 00-01-23 17:44:12 EST, you write:
The most MOTM and the HI-20 club.
2000-01-26 by J. Larry Hendry
Good to hear your thoughts Thomas. I wish some of the quiet people on this list would speak up more. The reward would be less of my idle Stooge Chat...
Re: MOTM-300 Question
2000-01-26 by thomas white
I would also like to chime in on the LED issue. I am all for spending the extra dollars to make my new unit all blinky on stage and it helps you to remember
Re: MOTM-300 Question
2000-01-26 by thomas white
Hi Nate! The 300 VCO is only slightly more complicated than the 320 LFO. I am still new to the list and MOTM but I just finished building a 300 VCO, 320 LFO,
Re: MOTM-300 Question
2000-01-26 by J. Larry Hendry
If you built a 320, you will do fine with a 300 in my opinion. The tracking takes a while to adjust. No scope required for that. A good ear to hear beating,
Re: MOTM-300 Question
2000-01-26 by JWBarlow@aol.com
... I believe Paul rated this his most difficult module to date more due to the parts count (something like 100 resistors) and the time it takes to assemble
MOTM-300 Question
2000-01-26 by Nathan Hunsicker
Hello all, just a few questions about the 300 VCO. Exactly how difficult is this module? I worked for 2 years in robotics R&D so I know a good amount. Is the
Re: UNofficial future MOTM list
2000-01-26 by J. Larry Hendry
The original sequencer of Paul s dreams was called MOAS for Mother Of All Sequencers. I remember Paul said that MOAS might never become a reality since it
Re: PaulBr's multiples
2000-01-26 by J. Larry Hendry
... I have three of those standard 12 connector power blocks (like I guess comes on the 940). I mounted them in small plastic project boxes without lids
Re: UNofficial future MOTM list
2000-01-26 by Nathan Hunsicker
Since I an somewhat new to MOTM, I have to ask... What is DOMOAS? Does it stand for something? Is this sequencer going to be anything like a Moog 960, or am I
Re: files/attachments/onelist
2000-01-26 by JWBarlow@aol.com
... Well Larry, better you and me than Bradley! Sheesh! Again with the sequencer! Give it a rest man! JB
RE: PaulBr's multiples
2000-01-26 by JWBarlow@aol.com
... I really think using the bracket to hold a power supply bus is not a good idea. I don t think the bracket is designed to take the kind of force from
Re: PaulBr's multiples
2000-01-25 by J. Larry Hendry
Damn it !! I hate it when you are THAT right. I thought the 6 unit correctly space mult in the middle would catch a fancy. But, I guess 6 would rarely be
Re: PaulBr's multiples
2000-01-25 by Roy Tate
... I occasionally use 5 or 6 jacks in a patch when I have 2 or 3 VCOs, and 2 filters. An example would be using 2 of the 420 filters, one in low-pass, one in
RE: PaulBr's multiples
2000-01-25 by Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)
In my expirience with the Clavia Nord Modular, I at most chain 4 connections (I.E., 1 source and 3 destinations), so a 4-unit multi is sufficient for me. And
Re: 2 Modding the 800 up to 800b specs
2000-01-25 by J. Larry Hendry
... little ... wire ... Looks like Dave and I had our Karma in sync with the tie wrap thing. Great Stooges think alike Larry H.
Re: Modding the 800 up to 800b specs
2000-01-25 by J. Larry Hendry
Thanks Roy. This is very complete and easy to follow. Tacking the diode across R 6 will be easy. I have a suggestion that will take care of that mechanical
RE: PaulBr's multiples
2000-01-25 by Dave Bradley
Well, it s your choice, Stooge brother. You can avoid 15 minutes of work and stare at those unevenly spaced rows of jacks for the rest of your synthesizing
Re: Modding the 800 up to 800b specs
2000-01-25 by Roy Tate
... I like Dave s Idea of using RTV or a similar rubber/plastic-like gunk. I guess I ll have to get some soon. My last tube dried up after only three years!!!
RE: Modding the 800 up to 800b specs
2000-01-25 by Dave Bradley
... If you are a stickler for details or move your MOTM a lot, can use a little blob of silicon RTV on R3 to hold the 1K in place, and secure the loose wire by
Re: PaulBr's multiples
2000-01-25 by J. Larry Hendry
... the ... Only if you bent them inward and that would end up looking like crap. ... Oh sure, that would work Dave. Geesh, that sure is a hell of a lot of
Re: files/attachments/onelist
2000-01-25 by J. Larry Hendry
Mark and others, Paul sent out a note yesterday I think that he wanted to be certain that the list was not circulated outside the confines of
Modding the 800 up to 800b specs
2000-01-25 by Roy Tate
... Sorry to convert private e-mail to public, but this is of interest to all, and several requested the info. First - full credit for the mod should go to
files/attachments/onelist
2000-01-25 by mark scetta
while we re talking about the mailing list itself, may i suggest that significant attachments, like this MS Word doc that i still have not seen, be placed in
RE: PaulBr's multiples
2000-01-25 by Dave Bradley
Could the bracket legs be narrowed to fit between the jacks and maintain the correct front panel spacing? If that doesn t work, how about cutting off one or
RE: MOTM Numbering Rationale
2000-01-25 by Tentochi
I have always maintained a personal list of what is available (price list), what is coming up and what the numbers mean. One addition: 000 - Things you can t
run to failure testing
2000-01-25 by J. Larry Hendry
... while ... OK, let s get this straight Stooge Curly. Someone had to do the field torque-to-failure tests on this gear. I admit, the toggle switches were
Re: PaulBr's multiples
2000-01-25 by J. Larry Hendry
... OK, I just finished the math and fitting exercise. Here is the scoop: If you stay 100% with Paul s jack spacing (which the astute will notice is a
Re: 940 question (again!)
2000-01-25 by JWBarlow@aol.com
... Many thanks Roy -- and good to hear from you again! Do you have two 900s or did you mount a power block somewhere in your system? ... Agreed (though
Re: 940 question (again!)
2000-01-25 by Paul Schreiber
NO, it doesn t have any power jacks. I plan to make a 1U wide reversing attenuator with 9 more MTA-156s. Paul S. in Charlottesville, VA ... From: Brousseau,
Re: 940 question (again!)
2000-01-25 by J. Larry Hendry
... I agree Paul. If there ain t a 1/4 phone jack, then I guess you just cannot connect it to anything. BTW, I did end up purchasing some of those Neutrik
Re: 940 question (again!)
2000-01-25 by Roy Tate
... I have a MOTM-940. I didn t know I was part of such a select group! The 940 is strictly a panel and some jacks, no power connector bus in sight. I
PaulBr's multiples
2000-01-25 by JWBarlow@aol.com
... Not much chance of that given Larry s penchant for building his muscles while assembling MOTM modules (look it up in the archives ). Although I m
RE: 940 question (again!)
2000-01-25 by Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)
Personally, I don t own or plan to own a 940... mostly cause of those other funny-lookin jacks. I figure they can t be worth much if I can t stick a 1/4
940 question (again!)
2000-01-25 by JWBarlow@aol.com
After getting NO responses from my question yesterday, I thought it must be due to the fact that either no one has a 940, or no one understood my question: ...
Re: MOTM modules
2000-01-25 by J. Larry Hendry
... OK, all those wanting a text version of the recently distributed MS word file, speak up. I will send it to you privately. Some of the formatting I used
Re: UNofficial future MOTM list
2000-01-24 by J. Larry Hendry
... Absolutely ... Since I am choosing to keep this unofficial list for use only by those on motm@onelist, I will make every attempt to update release
Re: AGAIN UNofficial future MOTM list
2000-01-24 by J. Larry Hendry
Oh, one more thing (OK, maybe two or three): If someone believes one of the modules belongs in a different category, just let me know. Otherwise, I will
Re: UNofficial future MOTM list
2000-01-24 by J. Larry Hendry
... Thanks Dave. Yes, or for the sake of ease to update, I could just keep the most current version here on my harddrive and mail it out to anyone asking.
Re: MOTM Numbering Rationale
2000-01-24 by The Old Crow
... For the 400-filter series, the numbers make a bit of sense: 410 -- PS3[10]0 420 -- MS[20] 440 -- SSM20[40] --Crow /**/
RE: MOTM Numbering Rationale
2000-01-24 by Dave Bradley
I haven t heard anything official from Paul, but what you have observed pretty much hits the mark. For instance, I believe we ve heard that the new NS/SH
MOTM modules
2000-01-24 by velure
one suggestion about the list. not everyone out there is dealing in the land of M$ no matter what the justice dept. thinks. maybe it should be a simple text
MOTM Numbering Rationale
2000-01-24 by Tkacs, Ken
I have a question about the numbering of MOTM modules. Obviously there s some method behind the madness, but I m wondering what the official designations-if
RE: UNofficial future MOTM list
2000-01-24 by Tkacs, Ken
Hey, that Word document was a great idea-thanks! You re right: Go search the archives is the kind of lazy, irritating answer to questions on lists like this
Re: UNofficial future MOTM list
2000-01-24 by Paul Schreiber
Please note that I do not want this list circulated about, except within the confines of this listserv (onelist.com) Don t forget, this is a *business* and I