Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

RE: [motm] MOTM compatible module

2000-08-22 by Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)

I'm jumping in a little late and half-cocked here, but...

I'd think I'd like to see it shortened to 5 segments (I.E., loose segments
5, 6, and 7) and have a "trigger out to next EG" added to put another in
series.

I think that the graphic should stay, definately.

LEDs are pretty.

Making the whole thing 3 or 4U wide is better than squashing the knobs
vertically.  I like fat knobs.  (Or is that phat knobs?)

Loops are excellent-- although I don't know much of the loop functionality
is compromised by removing segments-- perhaps more segments could be kept if
they would fit in a very wide (4U) panel.  Most likely, making the knobs
accessable to someone with heavy / large fingers is most important-- that's
part of the MOTM attraction to me.

Because the current MOTM form factor gives us 4 knobs vertically w/ room for
jacks and whatnot below... perhaps you could have a 4U panel with the first
4 time / level knobs in the first 2U, and the latter 4 time / level knobs in
the second 2U.  I don't know where the switches would end up...

Thanks for letting me blurt my random 2 cents!

--PBr

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Tony Karavidas [SMTP:tony@...]
> Sent:	Monday, August 21, 2000 9:26 PM
> To:	motm@egroups.com
> Subject:	RE: [motm] MOTM compatible module 
> 
> Ok, here's a slightly modified version:
> 
> (Same name, link provided for convenience)
> 
> http://www.encoreelectronics.com/motm/ENVGEN2.JPG
> 
> 
> The numbers around the knobs are gone, the stages have indicators above
> the
> LEDs and the graphic is a little larger. (The name changed a bit too.)
> 
> 
> Better...or worse?
> 
> Tony
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.