I'm jumping in a little late and half-cocked here, but... I'd think I'd like to see it shortened to 5 segments (I.E., loose segments 5, 6, and 7) and have a "trigger out to next EG" added to put another in series. I think that the graphic should stay, definately. LEDs are pretty. Making the whole thing 3 or 4U wide is better than squashing the knobs vertically. I like fat knobs. (Or is that phat knobs?) Loops are excellent-- although I don't know much of the loop functionality is compromised by removing segments-- perhaps more segments could be kept if they would fit in a very wide (4U) panel. Most likely, making the knobs accessable to someone with heavy / large fingers is most important-- that's part of the MOTM attraction to me. Because the current MOTM form factor gives us 4 knobs vertically w/ room for jacks and whatnot below... perhaps you could have a 4U panel with the first 4 time / level knobs in the first 2U, and the latter 4 time / level knobs in the second 2U. I don't know where the switches would end up... Thanks for letting me blurt my random 2 cents! --PBr > -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Karavidas [SMTP:tony@...] > Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 9:26 PM > To: motm@egroups.com > Subject: RE: [motm] MOTM compatible module > > Ok, here's a slightly modified version: > > (Same name, link provided for convenience) > > http://www.encoreelectronics.com/motm/ENVGEN2.JPG > > > The numbers around the knobs are gone, the stages have indicators above > the > LEDs and the graphic is a little larger. (The name changed a bit too.) > > > Better...or worse? > > Tony > > > > > > >
Message
RE: [motm] MOTM compatible module
2000-08-22 by Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.