> All of this probably explains why music technology has advanced tremendously > but the music hasn't. i disagree... look at ppl like autechre, u-ziq, haujobb, boards of canada, aphex twin, etc... these people are really advancing electronic music IMO. and they're "only" pop musicians. but the thing is, most of them are using their computers to do it... most of the music hardware these days is doing one of two things, refining rompler/sampler tech or trying to achieve that "vintage" sound... i mean, we of all people shouldn't be talking about advancing music technology... heck, we're still using patchcords! *laugh* this may be heresy to say here, but the sound *we're* chasing has very little to do with advancements in music. i *love* my MOTM, and i can make some seriously "advanced" sounds with it... but if i wanted to make autechre/haujobb-level "advanced" music, only things like csound and max/msp would do... okay... sorry, this is getting way off topic. <flamesuit="on"> bleep. out.
Message
Re: [motm] Re: art of synthesis
2001-03-01 by Cap'n F.M. Bleep
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.