I vote for speed. -- James Holloway jimh54@... - email (972) 993-2023 x1188 - voicemail/fax ---- "Tony Karavidas" <tony@...> wrote: > One more issue I've been working on is the switch bounce. I have found > an > implementation that doens't penalize the response to the leading edge > of a > trigger, BUT it does limit the repetition rate of the GATE. > For example, if I use 5mS dead time on the rising and falling edge > of the > switch, the input GATE is limited to just under 100Hz. This isn't a > problem > when it comes to using the UEG as an envelope generator. It takes over > 60mS > just to complete all the stages so most likely your input gate repetition > would be slower than 60mS. If you try to input a faster gate, you simple > start to chop off the final stages. The issue is with GATED-STEP mode > (sequencer). Without any debouce code, I can take the UEG up to about > 450Hz > input, and it runs fine all day. > > So I need more feedback: Would you like a little debounce is exchange > for > some gate speed, or screw the debounce switch stuff (since you hardly > use > the switch) and keep the speed? > > Tony > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > __________________________________________________ FREE voicemail, email, and fax...all in one place. Sign Up Now! http://www.onebox.com
Message
RE: [motm] More UEG tweaks!
2001-02-22 by James Holloway
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.