P3 sequencer
2003-10-27 by Paul Barker
Anywhere wher e I can hear some sounds of the P3 ? Paul _________________________________________________________________ Use MSN Messenger to send music and pics to your friends http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
Messages
Browse messages
Page 157 of 168 · 8362 messages matched
Re: [analogue-sequencer] P3 sequencer
2003-10-27 by Robert van der Kamp
On Monday 27 October 2003 14:50, Paul Barker wrote: > Anywhere wher e I can hear some sounds of the P3 ? Follow the pointers half way down Colin's P3 page: http://www.colinfraser.com/p3/p3.htm - Robert
Re: [analogue-sequencer] New directions
2003-10-27 by Robert van der Kamp
On Monday 27 October 2003 11:18, Colin f wrote: > > hi, any chance of a copy of the new OS? > > I'm only about half an hours effort away from finishing > the random direction modes, so I'll send you a copy when > I've done that, probably tonight or tomorrow. YO!!!! That's good ne
Re: [analogue-sequencer] New directions
2003-10-27 by Paul Maddox
Colin, > I'm only about half an hours effort away from finishing the random direction > modes, so I'll send you a copy when I've done that, probably tonight or > tomorrow. ok, no worries, I got enough to be doing right now :-) Paul
Re: [analogue-sequencer] New directions
2003-10-27 by Colin f
> hi, any chance of a copy of the new OS? I'm only about half an hours effort away from finishing the random direction modes, so I'll send you a copy when I've done that, probably tonight or tomorrow. Cheers, C ________________________________________________ Message sent using U
Re: [analogue-sequencer] New directions
2003-10-27 by Paul Maddox
Colin, hi, any chance of a copy of the new OS? Paul (back from holiday)
Ready-built P3
2003-10-22 by colinfraser_com
Folks, The first small run of ready-built P3s are now provisionally spoken for. I'll be using the funds from these to place an order for the second run of PCBs, so new PCB/CPU kits and further ready-built units will be available again soon - hopefully in time for Christmas. Cheer
RE: [analogue-sequencer] New beta
2003-10-20 by Colin f
> Good stuff man, very good. The UI really is far better than it has a > right to be. Does that make sense? It makes sense if you mean it's less trouble than the usual 16x2 LCD + buttons interface. I think it helps a lot that the 'basic' functionality doesn't rely on the LCD too
New beta
2003-10-20 by Paul Nagle
Colin, I really like the things you added (or subtly moved around) this time. The new directions are spot on - all of them, now I've twigged the differences. Tried lots of messing with last step, skip and changing directions during playback and seems pretty darn solid. Good stuff
Re: [analogue-sequencer] P3 v3.81 rev 1
2003-10-20 by Paul Nagle
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 23:43:58 -0000, "colinfraser_com" wrote: >Note that this mode interacts differently with gbar >than 'alternate', so unless you have chg=p, a penduluming pattern >with a length the same as gbar may not seem to pendulum. Mmmm, weirdness, love that! >I'm still th
P3 v3.81 rev 1
2003-10-19 by colinfraser_com
Folks, I've uploaded another beta firmware update. This extends the direction options a bit. The previous 'pendulum' behaviour has been renamed 'alternate'. The revised 'pendulum' mode now plays back and forth (or should that be forth and back ?) without repeating the end steps.
RE: [analogue-sequencer] No PLED trouble anymore
2003-10-17 by Colin f
> Think I solved the problem. And again I did something pretty stupid. > For lines 15 and 16 are not used using the PLED they were hanging > lose in my enclosure and I didn't like that, maybe it would make some > shortcut somwere. Pin 15 and 16 are the backlight supply for the LC
No PLED trouble anymore
2003-10-17 by roelp23
Hi, Think I solved the problem. And again I did something pretty stupid. For lines 15 and 16 are not used using the PLED they were hanging lose in my enclosure and I didn't like that, maybe it would make some shortcut somwere. So I putted some shrink cable around those lose ends.
PLED module problem
2003-10-17 by roelp23
Hi, I've just installed the new PLED module, and at first sight all seemed to work exept for the PLED module. After turning the 'brightness' trimpot the opposite side the characters showed up. I found that a little strange because I had to turn the trimpot to the opposite side th
clock device
2003-10-15 by roelp23
Hi Dave and others, Thanks for the replies on my 'debounce'problem. I thouht I should do something like that but I didn't knew what. No I have a start point, and I'm sure I'll find the right way to solve the problem. I'm not much of a technician and I don't understand anything of
Re: [analogue-sequencer] New Pictures Up
2003-10-15 by Andy Wilson
Hi Paul, > just reading my e-mail from Spain :-) :->) > > > Steve implemented all the changes he received, but I found that I > > still needed to hack 5mm of of the bottom of the keypad board > > because it was fouling the upper pot board. > > blast, I forgot about that.. > I mou
Re: [analogue-sequencer] New Pictures Up
2003-10-15 by Paul.Maddox@synth.Net
Andrew, > Back from your hols then? nope, just reading my e-mail from Spain :-) > Steve implemented all the changes he received, but I found that I > still needed to hack 5mm of of the bottom of the keypad board > because it was fouling the upper pot board. blast, I forgot about
RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: New directions
2003-10-14 by Colin f
> are you talking about lots of options for the direction settings or > lots of options in general? I'm talking about being able to store more settings that apply separately to every pattern. Each pattern has 16 steps * 4 bytes plus a single byte for timebase and length, and 4 by
Re: [analogue-sequencer] New Pictures Up
2003-10-14 by Paul Nagle
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 19:58:39 +0100, "Andy Wilson" wrote: >Nice layout though Paul, so thanks for that. I know Colin has >reservations about not having the function switches directly >underneath the display, but I don't find that a problem. I would, personally, but I'd also say th
Re: [analogue-sequencer] New Pictures Up
2003-10-14 by Andy Wilson
Hi Paul, Back from your hols then? > > How did it all go? > Any problems with the holes? I think I remembered to send Steve all the > changes needed. Steve implemented all the changes he received, but I found that I still needed to hack 5mm of of the bottom of the keypad board be
Re: New Pictures Up
2003-10-14 by ch.³l
> I would, personally, but I'd also say that the tempo knob should be > somewhere way away from the buttons cos my hands are permanently > resting on the buttons... my thoughts exactly. so i'm going to move it and plug the hole soon.
Re: New directions
2003-10-14 by ch.³l
hi Colin, > thought I didn't have much space to store the direction settings per > pattern, but now I've found plenty space so it's not a problem to > add lots of options, except if it makes the UI too complicated. are you talking about lots of options for the direction settings
Re: [analogue-sequencer] New Pictures Up
2003-10-14 by Paul.Maddox@synth.Net
Andy, > Just collected my Hammond case from Steve Thomas this > weekend. Spent Sunday shoe-horning all the boards in. Nice work! How did it all go? Any problems with the holes? I think I remembered to send Steve all the changes needed. Paul
Re: Cases (was: New Pictures Up)
2003-10-14 by cikira@redmoon-music.com
> Steve is not actually sourcing the cases, but if you provide it, he'll >do the drilling and engraving at a very reasonable rate. Case for sale here! Hammond sells (only) a cream box with wood sides, and a black and blue all-metal combination. I bit the bullet and bought two cas
Re: [analogue-sequencer] MOTM fron panel??
2003-10-14 by Colin f
> Someone on this list recently mentioned a MOTM-style front > panel for the P3. Since I'm building a modest MOTM system > here, you'll understand I'm interested, to say the least. I've got a Schaeffer file for an MOTM/Oakley form factor version of the rack panel, but that won't
RE: [analogue-sequencer] New Pictures Up
2003-10-14 by Andy Wilson
Hi Paul, > > I know I keep asking the same question but last time I promise: > > What was the TOTAL cost of this sequencer including EVERYTHING apart from > labour? Well, I suppose persistance pays off. I reckon the whole lot cost approx £225. ( But don't tell the wife :->0) This
RE: [analogue-sequencer] New Pictures Up
2003-10-14 by Paul Hartfree
Yes Andy - looks very cool. I know I keep asking the same question but last time I promise: What was the TOTAL cost of this sequencer including EVERYTHING apart from labour? thx for sharing the pics Paul London > > Just collected my Hammond case from Steve Thomas this > > weekend
MOTM fron panel??
2003-10-14 by Robert van der Kamp
Someone on this list recently mentioned a MOTM-style front panel for the P3. Since I'm building a modest MOTM system here, you'll understand I'm interested, to say the least. ;) I'd like to know some more details, like: How does it look? Where was it made? How did you do the dril
Re: [analogue-sequencer] New directions
2003-10-14 by Robert van der Kamp
On Tuesday 14 October 2003 11:58, Colin f wrote: > A jump of 2 steps might be possible - depends on the > probabilities. It could be there's a 30% chance of going > one step forward, 30% chance of one step back, 30% chance > of staying put, and 5% chances of 2 steps forward or >
Re: [analogue-sequencer] New directions
2003-10-14 by Colin f
> Any known dates for the ready-build units and/or > the prepopulated boards? I should have 4 ready-built units finished in a few of weeks. Steve T is going to do the cases for me, which are the same desktop style as Paul Nagle's unit. Anyone wanting one of these might like to dr
Re: [analogue-sequencer] New directions
2003-10-14 by Robert van der Kamp
On Tuesday 14 October 2003 10:49, Colin f wrote: > I've found that picking and packing the complete set of > components for a sequencer is more effort than just > stuffing the boards and assembling the final unit, so > it's not really worthwhile my selling a complete kit of > par
Re: [analogue-sequencer] New directions
2003-10-14 by Colin f
> Will upgrading to a newer OS using these new pattern options > invalidate currently stored patterns? No. The existing 'length' setting on each step has a range of 1 to 12, so only the lower 4 bits of the length bytes are used. I've used the upper nybble of the length bytes for
Re: [analogue-sequencer] New directions
2003-10-14 by Robert van der Kamp
On Tuesday 14 October 2003 09:57, Colin f wrote: > I thought I didn't have > much space to store the direction settings per pattern, > but now I've found plenty space so it's not a problem to > add lots of options, except if it makes the UI too > complicated. Will upgrading to a
Re: [analogue-sequencer] New directions
2003-10-14 by Colin f
> Why not support both? Many arpeggatiors have both options. > Pendulum- and Pendulum+? I most probably will. I was thinking of changing the current mode to the non-repeating mode, since GBar can be used to keep the length sensible. I thought I didn't have much space to store the
Re: [analogue-sequencer] New directions
2003-10-14 by Robert van der Kamp
On Tuesday 14 October 2003 00:32, colinfraser_com wrote: > Pendulum plays > alternately forward, then reverse. A modified version of > this might not play the first and last steps twice - I > did it this way so that the pattern length is doubled, > rather than being an odd number
Re: [analogue-sequencer] Cases (was: New Pictures Up)
2003-10-13 by Andy Wilson
Hi Mark, Steve is not actually sourcing the cases, but if you provide it, he'll do the drilling and engraving at a very reasonable rate. Check out: http://monopole.ph.qmul.ac.uk/~thomas/synthdiy/cnc.htm for contact details. If you look back through the archives, Paul Maddox gave
Cases (was: New Pictures Up)
2003-10-13 by Mark Pulver
Andy Wilson (01:32 pm 10/13/2003) wrote: >Hi All, > >Just collected my Hammond case from Steve Thomas this >weekend. Spent Sunday shoe-horning all the boards in. Looking great Andy! Okay... It sounds like it's time for me to finally get into building mine! It's been sitting here
RE: [analogue-sequencer] New Pictures Up
2003-10-13 by Colin f
> Just collected my Hammond case from Steve Thomas this > weekend. Spent Sunday shoe-horning all the boards in. > > Here's the results. Pretty damn cool. > > http://www.techman.synth.net/techman_website2_000033.htm Looking good, Andy. I like the idea of a single rectangular hole
New directions
2003-10-13 by colinfraser_com
I've posted P3 v3.81 beta in the files section. This adds an early implementation of 'direction', which you'll find in place of 'shift' in pattern edit. Shift has moved to a new page after cut/copy/paste. The options so far are forward, reverse, and pendulum. Forward is what it i
New Pictures Up
2003-10-13 by Andy Wilson
Hi All, Just collected my Hammond case from Steve Thomas this weekend. Spent Sunday shoe-horning all the boards in. Here's the results. Pretty damn cool. http://www.techman.synth.net/techman_website2_000033.htm All the best Andy -- Andy Wilson http://www.techman.synth.net mailto:
Re: [analogue-sequencer] sysex and more
2003-10-12 by Dave Magnuson
At 12:24 PM 10/11/03 -0000, you wrote: >Third, also for the clock-thing: I'm looking for a good start/stop >cirquit. Now I use a common push to make switch for stopping and >starting the machine, but the switch doesn't work right. For when I >start the machine, it runs, but mostl
RE: [analogue-sequencer] sysex and more
2003-10-11 by Colin f
> That thing with a black upper row and a clear lower row in the > display, sounds a little familiar with me. The LCD display has a CPU of it's own. The P3 CPU communicates with it over a simple 8 bit wide bus, which has data lines, read/write, enable and a register select. The s
sysex and more
2003-10-11 by roelp23
Hi, That thing with a black upper row and a clear lower row in the display, sounds a little familiar with me. That happened sometimes wih my P3, but not when I was ramming the buttons too fast, but when I did something unlogical with a midi-master device, like pulling the din plu
Re: P3 v3.8 beta
2003-10-11 by ch.³l
hi Colin, > When I was testing the hold code, I found it confusing that a restart > didn't clear it. > I guess I could add a 'keep hold on restart' option for those of a > different opinion... not really necessary for me. the way it works at the moment is pretty logical and i can
P3 v3.8
2003-10-10 by Colin f
Folks, I've uploaded firmware v3.8 rev 2 to Yahoo files, with the 'hold' setting retained during change of tbase in pattern edit. And since I've now been using this version for a week without finding any other bugs (obviously not looking as hard as Chiel:), I've made it the curre
RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: P3 v3.8 beta
2003-10-10 by Colin f
> got some minor weirdness going on..i'm not quite sure if it's new to > OSv3.8 or if it's been there all along, but it's getting noticeable > now that my fingers are developing button-shaped indents..;) > when in play mode (of course..) i go to playlist-edit, push > the 'hold' s
Re: P3 v3.8 beta
2003-10-10 by ch.³l
hi Colin, got some minor weirdness going on..i'm not quite sure if it's new to OSv3.8 or if it's been there all along, but it's getting noticeable now that my fingers are developing button-shaped indents..;) when in play mode (of course..) i go to playlist-edit, push the 'hold' s
Re: About Oberkorn sequencer
2003-10-10 by ch.³l
--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, "madebygaybird" wrote: > Anybody had use Analogue Solution's Oberkorn. I just buy one. But I > pwer it up and try to use the Internal clock to control the > sequencer . The machines just not Run! I had reset all the button and > try . It
About Oberkorn sequencer
2003-10-10 by madebygaybird
Anybody had use Analogue Solution's Oberkorn. I just buy one. But I pwer it up and try to use the Internal clock to control the sequencer . The machines just not Run! I had reset all the button and try . It just not Run.Anybody can help me? Bird
RE: [analogue-sequencer] Re: Pled module
2003-10-08 by Colin f
> damn that looks good.. > Next question, > Where from?????? Farnell part no. 4141921, price 32.99 including VAT. C