In that case I have an SDE with loads of extra features if anyone's interested. ;-) Susie http://www.myspace.com/susangardener --- In Simmons_Drums@yahoogroups.com, jesper <jesper@...> wrote: > > Susie skrev: > > Mine's 1046. Does that mean it's one of the first batch? Is that good or > > bad? Still working fine though! (Better than my sds1000 which is now on > > it's 4th major fault with the hi tom now gone awol) > > Susie > > http://www.myspace.com/susangardener > > 1289 here if I recall correct. I _think_ they started below 1000, but > I'm not positive. Wolfgang knows best I guess. :) > > The net is filled with info about synthesizer production runs and most > of them are wrong IMHO. Many companies started at 1000, some made > different versions with new serials, other missed marking some etc. > > Regarding the SDS-1000: You must start seeing it as a "feature" and not > a flaw! ;) > > -- > electronically yours, jesper > > - -- --- ---- ----- ---- --- -- - > www.electronic-obsession.se >
Message
Re: Dave Stewart and a modded SDS-V
2010-07-03 by Susie
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.