So far as Will and I are concerned, the smaller holes are just fine (assuming they'd be in the same spot as the larger holes)- we'll drill them out no prob. But I'll warrant that you, Scott, would probably be willing to drill them out for someone who needs the service for a few bucks, right? So it's not like someone really needs to have a drill-press and step-drill to have a usable panel with the larger holes... you could do it for anyone who would rather pay a couple extra for it than drill for themselves. A thought, tho - will our English step-drill neatly fit into metric holes to enlarge them? Hmmmm.... Bill (and Will) --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, Scott Deyo <contact@...> wrote: > > sure and sure. > > what is the diameter for those 16mm, anyway? if folks need bigger it > would be easy to drill them bigger, eh? > > the jacks... i think most people would beat you for that one.... > > Scott Deyo > The Bridechamber > contact@... > http://www.bridechamber.com > Jealous Edison Record Kompany > http://www.jealousedison.com > > > On Mar 16, 2009, at 4:34 PM, loopcycle wrote: > > > ok, looked quickly at the design and it looks badass. i would most > > likely pick up a panel. > > one criticism though--if you're going to do the electro music dot com > > graphic, make sure it reads > > > > electro-music.com > > > > (INCLUDE THE HYPHEN because electromusic.com would be wrong.) > > > > i would like to put in a request for this panel design though. can > > the pot mounting holes be punched for the smaller 16mm alpha pots > > instead of the larger bourns/spectrol pots? should we poll the group > > to see who's using smaller alphas VS larger pots like the bourns? > > > > > > ok, now here's a really stupid idea that i'd love: punch the jack > > mounting holes small to accommodate 3.5mm jacks. please dont beat me > > for suggesting it. (im doing more and more diy with mini jacks these > > days and scaling back my 1/4" collection.) > > > > hans > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Mon, 3/16/09, Paul Lord <plord@...> wrote: > >> From: Paul Lord <plord@...> > >> Subject: Re: [ModularSynthPanels] Klee and MFOS sequencer > >> To: ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com > >> Date: Monday, March 16, 2009, 1:48 PM > >> > >> > >> The Thomas White rotary design is in teh top level directory of the > >> Files section for this group, and yes, the FPE is almost 3x what > >> Scott > >> is proposing. That leaves a lot of dosh for 38 (?) super high end > >> switches. > >> > >> Paul > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Scott Deyo <contact@bridechambe > >> r.com> wrote: > >> > I'm thinking $80-$100. > >> > The FPE is nearly $300!!!!!!! There's a WTF for ya, huh? > >> > > >> > Scott Deyo > >> > The Bridechamber > >> > contact@bridechambe r.com > >> > http://www.bridecha mber.com > >> > Jealous Edison Record Kompany > >> > http://www.jealouse dison.com > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mar 16, 2009, at 3:37 PM, loopcycle wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> id like to see the final design too, and get a rough idea of the > >> cost of > >> >> the klee panel. i have a second kit sitting around and id prefer > >> to have a > >> >> nice panel for it. > >> >> > >> >> --- On Mon, 3/16/09, Scott Deyo <contact@bridechambe r.com> > >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > From: Scott Deyo <contact@bridechambe r.com> > >> >> > Subject: Re: [ModularSynthPanels ] Klee and MFOS sequencer > >> >> > To: ModularSynthPanels@ yahoogroups. com > >> >> > Date: Monday, March 16, 2009, 1:26 PM > >> >> > I'll be posting the design this week, hopefully. > >> >> > Panel parts shouldn't be bad. > >> >> > Wiring... lots of fun! > >> >> > > >> >> > Scott Deyo > >> >> > The Bridechamber > >> >> > contact@bridechambe r.com > >> >> > http://www.bridecha mber.com > >> >> > Jealous Edison Record Kompany > >> >> > http://www.jealouse dison.com > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Mar 16, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Ron Pool wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > > I might be in for two Klee panels if panel parts are > >> >> > easy to source. > >> >> > > Where can I see what Thomas White's Klee layout > >> >> > looks like? > >> >> > > > >> >> > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Jason Proctor > >> >> > <jason@redfish. net> wrote: > >> >> > > > i think you should relate what happened with the > >> >> > first one :-) > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >>I'm in for a Klee. > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>Yes, building a second one :) > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>Paul > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > -- > >> >> > > Ron Pool <amp1ron@gmail. com> > >> >> > > > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > > > > >
Message
Re: Klee and MFOS sequencer
2009-03-17 by wjhall11
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.