Ha! Touche! Bravo! But there's only one 16-year-old of us to run those patches - and yes, he's on his school's fencing team so he's got all that leg-strength to boot. Me - I'm just his crazy old man and I generally acquiesce to his unquestionable greater 16-year-old wisdom <LOL>. So how will you fit all this stuff on a 2U? THIS I gotta see <G>. Bill (Will has finally gone to bed after testing out a killer burger recipe) --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, "andrewlistmayer" <andrewlistmayer@...> wrote: > > Ahh, now I see why no concern over real estate. There are 2 of you! > That's twice as many hands to build cabinets. Also, when one of you is > about to pass out while running from one side of the modular to the > other to make a patch you can pass the baton, er, patch cord ;) > > Speaking of crazy, now I'm leaning towards cramming Scott's version > plus maybe a couple of your sine waves on 2U :O > > I started building standard MOTM modules, but I'm probably going to > end up with the Mattson Mini Modular. > > > --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, "wjhall11" <wjhall@> wrote: > > > > Andrew - for the record... no disrespect taken at all - and yes, we > > are crazy. <LOL> > > > > As the originators of the perverse 5U version, we freely acknowledge > > the advantage of Scott J's original 3U version... real estate! And > > the 3U version also presents the four - what - "channels"? in a way > > that may be slightly more intuitive for some users. With my > > human-engineering hat on, I see the benefit in both designs. > > > > In our case (due to our self-avowed insanity <G>) real-estate is not > > an issue. > > > > Just a note - lest we forget - that the true, distinct benefit of the > > 5U design (a fringe benefit, in a way, from trying to make a strictly > > MOTM compatible design) is that the 5U version has the space for the > > four outputs Scott says he left out of the 3U design - the SINE jacks. > > So for those that want those outputs, the 5U version is probably the > > way to go. But otherwise... hey... > > > > Clearly, it's great that Scott Deyo will manufacture the 3U version > > this run. > > > > Again - no offense taken - ever - and further, we agree... the 3U > > version is great... we'll put it up on the DragonflyAlley.com site > > along with the 5U version. > > > > Bill and Will > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, "andrewlistmayer" > > <andrewlistmayer@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, Scott Juskiw <scott@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > and the 3U wide version of the TLN-712 Doomsday Machine > > > > > > > > > YES!!! > > > > > > No disrespect, but when I look at the 5U version, all I can think is > > > "are you guys crazy?" ;) > > > > > >
Message
Re: Next Panel Run Part One
2008-07-02 by wjhall11
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.