Modular Synth Panels

Andrew - for the record... no disrespect taken at all - and yes, we
are crazy.  <LOL>

As the originators of the perverse 5U version, we freely acknowledge
the advantage of Scott J's original 3U version... real estate!  And
the 3U version also presents the four - what - "channels"? in a way
that may be slightly more intuitive for some users.  With my
human-engineering hat on, I see the benefit in both designs.

In our case (due to our self-avowed insanity <G>) real-estate is not
an issue.

Just a note - lest we forget - that the true, distinct benefit of the
5U design (a fringe benefit, in a way, from trying to make a strictly
MOTM compatible design) is that the 5U version has the space for the
four outputs Scott says he left out of the 3U design - the SINE jacks.
 So for those that want those outputs, the 5U version is probably the
way to go.  But otherwise... hey...

Clearly, it's great that Scott Deyo will manufacture the 3U version
this run.  

Again - no offense taken - ever - and further, we agree... the 3U
version is great... we'll put it up on the DragonflyAlley.com site
along with the 5U version.

Bill and Will





--- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, "andrewlistmayer"
<andrewlistmayer@...> wrote:
>
> --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, Scott Juskiw <scott@> wrote:
> >
> > and the 3U wide version of the TLN-712 Doomsday Machine
> 
> 
> YES!!!
> 
> No disrespect, but when I look at the 5U version, all I can think is
> "are you guys crazy?" ;)
>