There is a lot of similarities between the Q and MicroQ, but attention that there are some substancial differences, not only in synthesis power (namely at the filters and their combinations, but also, very clearly in my opinion in the smoothness of the sound, the micro seems even more agressive and is never capable to achieve the Q smoothness (I don't know if this has to do with sonic quality of the converters or on the algorithms side, I guess its the later)...the Q has more than twice the DSP power and a lot less voices...this must mean something... About leads...I have to confess that it really depends, because while for the more smooth wistling leads, like the "old" mono moogs, than the A6 is way better but I have, and there are on the net, some Q leads that are fantastic...one of them, I do not recall names, its one of my favourites of all time, much like some I could get with the old roland SH1 , quite "hip-hop/rap" leads from the 80's. Paulo > Actually the MicroQ and Q have the same technology inside each other... > appart some other precisions. So your answer has some importance. Problem > i wouldn't be able to keep both... but i would be happy of course like > most of you would. =: ) Well i can actually but my money economies in bank > would get very low. > > Ahhhhh i have to check this thing about Hartmann... > It's important i think. > Thanks > > Moreno > Paulo Abreu ------------------- peabreu@...
Message
RE: [Andromeda_A6] Re:Andromeda really good to get
2003-01-16 by Paulo Abreu
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.