Actually the MicroQ and Q have the same technology inside each other... appart some other precisions. So your answer has some importance. Problem i wouldn't be able to keep both... but i would be happy of course like most of you would. =: ) Well i can actually but my money economies in bank would get very low. Ahhhhh i have to check this thing about Hartmann... It's important i think. Thanks Moreno >-----Original Message----- >From: Larry <heroesforghosts@...> >[mailto:heroesforghosts@...] >Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:07 AM >To: Andromeda_A6@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [Andromeda_A6] Re:Andromeda really good to get > > >I don't have a Q,but I do have the Micro Q and XT.The first thing I >noticed when comparing the Waldorf sound to the Andromeda is that >they share some common ground,both have great pads,as well as >strings,and basses. After a while,I began to notice the Waldorf pads >have a somewhat digital graininess to them,while the Andromeda's pads >were more smooth in texture. I like both,and there's a place in music >for all sounds. The Andromeda does better leads,period. The Waldorfs >leads,even the ones emulating analog,just don't sound as good. Both >machines have(Q and A6)their own good and bad points,but if you can >afford to have them both,you can cover a lot of sonic >territory.Weren't the Q and Andromeda both designed by Axel >Hartmann,maker of the new Neuron synth? > > >To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: >Andromeda_A6-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >
Message
RE: [Andromeda_A6] Re:Andromeda really good to get
2003-01-13 by RENGA Moreno
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.