200e

Hi,

I have been a lurker here for quite some time, and having read the  
first part of the SOS review I feel the need to write.

The "biased opinions" in an article are one thing, and although I  
expect a reviewer to get rid of these or at least mark them as such,  
people are entitled to them.

But "technical inaccuracies" are another thing, and I think it would  
really help all of us around here if you pointed out and corrected  
the article's technical inaccuracies that are directly related to the  
200e here for us.

Thanks in advance,
Jan-Hinnerk
+++


On 28.11.2005, at 22:54, � wrote:

> the SOS 200e review is filled with so many technical inaccuracies  
> and biased opinions that I would hardly base a purchase on what it  
> has to say.
>
> you would think a large publication like Sound on Sound would  
> employ people to check their facts prior to print.  it appears not  
> to be the case however, as far as the 200e review is concerned
>
> shame, I was looking forward to it.
> -r