--- In
ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, "dwv1957" <dragonslair@...> wrote:
>
> Yo Tom, are you buying any of Paul's modules? if not, then do us all a favor, and shut your trap!!
> The only thing Paul did wrong, was to tell everyone that the guy who orders 10 modules will get priority over the guy who orders 1 module.
> What Paul should have done, was not to say anything, then tell the guy who ordered the 1 module "sorry, but we are sold out" , then we wouldn't have you spamming this site with your verbal diarrhea!
>
> My 2c worth
>
> Dave
>
>
> --- In
ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, Tom Farrand <mbedtom@> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:22 PM, krisp audio <krisp14u@> wrote:
> > >
> > >> -------SNIP-------
> > >> >
> > >> > Disclaimer some boards are in short supply (like 2-3) and will be given
> > >> > priority to bigger orders
> > >> >
> > >> > Is this fair No but then most of you are over 10 years old and will have
> > >> > worked out that life isn't fair and cash is king
> > >> >
> > >> -------SNIP-------
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> All,
> > >>
> > >> " ... life isn't fair and cash is king."
> > >>
> > >> So, this is a "sale" to the the highest bidder? I see.
> > >
> > > No bidding this isn't EBay the price is fixed
> > >
> > >> Life being unfair is not a consequence ... it is a choice. I am over
> > >> 10 years of age and I see that rather clearly. Integrity was sold for
> > >> a few quid. Sad.
> > >
> > > Yes it is SAD that you posted this
> > >
> > > If my Integrity is sold for a few quid then God help me Im just trying to
> > > feed my family in hard times
> > >
> > > Do you get people having a go at you when you're doing your job?
> > >
> > > Or are you one of the guys who think making money out of synth is a crime
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > If you have anything else to share please do
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Paul (Apparently the guy to have a go at for trying to make a living)Darlow
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Paul,
> >
> > You and I are at the grocery store. I wanted two heads of lettuce but
> > there was only one. No matter, I'll have cabbage instead. (The
> > distance I travel to the grocery store causes me to stock up because I
> > won't be back for some time. Motor car fuel is so expensive.)
> >
> > We get to the checkout. Oh! My grocery cart is a higher cost than is
> > yours. So, I will have your lettuce. And you have some lunch meat.
> > I'll have that too. After all, the one spending the most money gets
> > the preferential treatment. Cash is king! And don't blame the
> > grocer. After all, the grocer is just trying to feed his family.
> > Yeah, me too.
> >
> > The ultimate test of fairness is equitability. If the roles were
> > reversed would the participants still be content with the outcome? My
> > grocery store example is precisely the same logic. If I took food out
> > of your cart because I am spending more money, that seems rather a bit
> > unfair. What is wrong with first come – first served? Without that
> > basic premise, the person who merely wants to buy a loaf of bread and
> > a bottle of milk would never make it through the cashier. Everybody
> > else will almost always have a fuller cart. Should the buyer of only
> > bread and milk be denied his purchase? I guess so.
> >
> >
> > How you run your business is entirely up to you. By response volume,
> > it appears that I am in the small minority. The jury of public
> > opinion has spoken. All the same, I stand by my words.
> >
> >
> > To I-K Ahmad: In the case of the five or six 50" TVs for $200 each …
> > you made my point for me. In exactly the example you cited, it was
> > first come - first served. Yes? It was not how much you bought that
> > mattered, only that the first five or six people in the queue got the
> > deal. In your example and mine, the queue mattered most. I agree!
> >
> > Soapbox time remaining: 0.0
> > Tom Farrand
> >
>