On 6 apr 2009, at 21:29, Chris Muir wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2009, at 11:15 AM, Scott Deyo wrote:
>
>> General discussion of the royalty is OK, too, but... Probably
>> everyone
>> will be more than happy to support E-M
>
>
> E-M deserves support, no doubt, but a 20% surcharge on a panel is a
> bit steep, IMO. Licensing fees are rarely this high in the "real
> world."
I agree. I'm all for supporting E-M but 20% seems a tad high. And
isn't the design done by Thomas White? Shouldn't he share in the
royalties too?
Anyway, if this is the deal, then I'm still in. Need panel.
Ben