previous by date | index | next by date |
previous in topic | topic list | next in topic |
On Jan 28, 2009, at 8:38 AM, David Moylan wrote:
> I like this idea but wouldn't 3 attenu-verters be more useful? Could
> probably be done with an MUUB.
>
> Dave
>
> Scott Deyo wrote:That could easily be done, but they'll have to wait
> a bit until the current run is finished and paid for.
>>
>> Good idea!
>>
>> I was also planning on making one for DotCom cabinets, a partial
>> width for all those MOTMers using DotCom cabs.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Scott Deyo
>> The Bridechamber
>> contact@...
>> http://www.bridechamber.com
>> Jealous Edison Record Kompany
>> http://www.jealousedison.com
>>
>>
>> On Jan 27, 2009, at 6:09 PM, Richard Brewster wrote:
>>
>>> I've realized that I could use some passive attenuators. Just 100K
>>> linear pots wired to jacks for in and out. Three could fit on a 1U
>>> MOTM-format panel in the same configuration as an Oakley Multi-Mix.
>>> I
>>> can easily make a FPE panel design for this, but wouldn't this be a
>>> nice
>>> addition to Bridechamber?
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> -Richard Brewster
>>> http://www.pugix.com
>>>
>
>
>