I think it's a good Idea, I have used your long brackets for
mounting the Steiner and the Wave Multiplier boards, with little
problem at all. But something that would be taller would be even
better...
Howard
--- In
motmpanels@yahoogroups.com, Larry Hendry
<hendrysr@y...> wrote:
> I have one of Ken Stones PCBs and know of others how have
been
> recently building these into their MOTM / Oakley format
systems. I
> find that my PCB is long and skinny compared to the Oakly /
MOTM /
> Blacet formats.
>
> In fact, on the Wave Multiplier PCB I have, the 6 inch length, is
too
> long running up and down for even my wide 4 pot bracket.
>
> So, anyhow here is my question....
>
> I am thinking af making a new bracket. Todd has asked me to
make
> these available. It would be the same depth as my 3 pot and 4
pot
> short brackets. However, the back 2 1/2 inches of the bracket
would
> be at least 6 inches tall. This would go behind any pots,
switches,
> or jacks on the front of the panels leaving almost 2 inches of
space
> for mounting stuff in front of the bracket.
>
> Since Ken is not consistent with PCB hole placement, there
would be
> no PCB mouting holes. But, the bracket PCB mouting space
would be
> large enough for any of his PCBs (the bigger ones that do not
fit on
> my normal brackets). And, they would of course conform to the
normal
> MOTM statdards. This would be a 3 pot bracket.
>
> Any interest in these brackets?
> Larry Hendry
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
> http://search.yahoo.com