Yahoo Groups archive

Emu XL-7 & MP-7 User's Group

Index last updated: 2026-04-05 20:33 UTC

Thread

NEWBIE WITH A QUESTION BOUT THE MP-7

NEWBIE WITH A QUESTION BOUT THE MP-7

2003-07-08 by my nickname (tag name) is all you need t

I CURRENTLY HAVE A ROLAND VM-3100PRO MIXER(THE ROLAND STUDIO 
PACKAGED THAT USED TO BE ADVERTISED IN THE EQUIPMENT MAGS,)THAT'S 
CONNECTED TO A SOUND CARD IN THE BACK OF MY COMPUTER. I WAS WANTING 
TO KNOW WHAT WOULD BE THE BEST WAY FOR ME TO HOOK MY MP-7 TO MY 
MIXER. I'LL BE GETTIN THE AKAI MPC2000XL IN ABOUT 2 MONTHS AND I 
WANNA BE ABLE TO UTILIZE ALL THE SAMPLING FEATURES THAT THE MPC HAS 
TO OFFER AS WELL AS ALL THE SOUND FEATURES THE MP-7 HAS TO OFFER. 
THANKS FOR ALL THE HELP. HOLLA. ONE.

Re: NEWBIE WITH A QUESTION BOUT THE MP-7

2003-07-09 by sincultura13

I'm going to second the rack sampler advice... Even if you get an ESi 
you're going to have a better sampler than with the MPC. I don't get 
it, if you wanted the MPC you should have gotten the Mo phat Keys or 
the module. And, if you want the Mpc's sampler buy a fully expanded 
S2000 that costs 1/5 an Mpc... But, hey, its your money. 



--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "my nickname (tag name) is all you need 
to know" <trez260_2000@y...> wrote:
> your advise is greatfully appreciated. saving some money is one my 
> interested while completing my home studio. however, i've heard the 
> mpc2000xl and mp-7 combo together, and i simply love what both of 
> them combine put out. i've been following the mpc series for a 
> minute and based on the research i've done, as well as seeing the 
> expandability of it,and hearing it perform, the akai is my personal 
> preference. the sounds in the mp-7 is just what i want for original 
> instrumentation, however as far as samples are concerned, and 
drums. 
> the mpc also gives me the sound, and options to manipulate the 
> samples the way i intend to do so. i also like the facts that they 
> are both desktop units as opposed to rack mount. again these are 
> just my personal preferances. nothing right or wrong. i do 
> appreciate the advise and ideas that you have provided me. thank 
you.
> 
> --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "glennjamison" <glennjamison@h...> 
wrote:
> > I would personally find that combination a little redundant. That 
> is 
> > having both an MPC2000 and an MP-7. You can very easily add 
> sampling 
> > capabilities to the MP-7 at a fraction of the price of an AKAI 
MPC-
> > 2000.  I have an E-mu E6400 Ultra and use the triggers on the MP-
7 
> to 
> > trigger samples from the E6400.  You can get an E-5000 Ultra 
> nowadays 
> > for about $500 on e-bay and the e-mu samplers and the MP-7 merge 
> > together quite seamlessly.  I know this isn't the answer to the 
> > question that you asked but you may want to look into it.  It 
> would 
> > save you some serious cash.
> > 
> > Glenn
> > 
> > --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "my nickname (tag name) is all you 
> need 
> > to know" <trez260_2000@y...> wrote:
> > > I CURRENTLY HAVE A ROLAND VM-3100PRO MIXER(THE ROLAND STUDIO 
> > > PACKAGED THAT USED TO BE ADVERTISED IN THE EQUIPMENT MAGS,)
> THAT'S 
> > > CONNECTED TO A SOUND CARD IN THE BACK OF MY COMPUTER. I WAS 
> WANTING 
> > > TO KNOW WHAT WOULD BE THE BEST WAY FOR ME TO HOOK MY MP-7 TO MY 
> > > MIXER. I'LL BE GETTIN THE AKAI MPC2000XL IN ABOUT 2 MONTHS AND 
I 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > > WANNA BE ABLE TO UTILIZE ALL THE SAMPLING FEATURES THAT THE MPC 
> HAS 
> > > TO OFFER AS WELL AS ALL THE SOUND FEATURES THE MP-7 HAS TO 
> OFFER. 
> > > THANKS FOR ALL THE HELP. HOLLA. ONE.

Re: NEWBIE WITH A QUESTION BOUT THE MP-7

2003-07-09 by lostusomewhere2003

as far as bang for the buck is concerned...i agree that you can get a 
lot more sampler for the money going the rack mount route. i am 
planning on getting some type of rack sampler within 3 mnths. I'm 
a 'hobbyist' with a very limited budget as well.  Have been looking 
into software and such. but i keep coming back to my need to 'touch' 
hardware, and not deal with a mouse and keyboard too much. I guess i 
just don't like to be near my computer during musical conception, 
save for refining sequences, recording audio, or other more complex 
parts of making a song.  i love sequencing on the XL even though 
software is much more powerful.  Maybe that's because it think like a 
hobbyist and not a professional? you already have a desktop 
conroller..with pads no less, but for subjective reasons i presume, 
you are drawn towards the mpc. I know a guy who has one, been able to 
mess around with it, but not too indepth, in any case, i really don't 
like its interface, and overall "feeling" i get from it. I lean 
towards Tech House and Euro Trance (don't laugh), and dab into other 
styles to a lesser extent, and the mpc just doesn't "feel" right to 
me. If the mpc "feels" better to you than a rack sampler, then saving 
500 bucks or however much, really isn't a big factor i suppose. Go 
with whatever suits your creative flow i guess, if you can afford it. 

Sv

--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "sincultura13" <sincultura13@y...> wrote:
> I'm going to second the rack sampler advice... Even if you get an 
ESi 
> you're going to have a better sampler than with the MPC. I don't 
get 
> it, if you wanted the MPC you should have gotten the Mo phat Keys 
or 
> the module. And, if you want the Mpc's sampler buy a fully expanded 
> S2000 that costs 1/5 an Mpc... But, hey, its your money. 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "my nickname (tag name) is all you need 
> to know" <trez260_2000@y...> wrote:
> > your advise is greatfully appreciated. saving some money is one 
my 
> > interested while completing my home studio. however, i've heard 
the 
> > mpc2000xl and mp-7 combo together, and i simply love what both of 
> > them combine put out. i've been following the mpc series for a 
> > minute and based on the research i've done, as well as seeing the 
> > expandability of it,and hearing it perform, the akai is my 
personal 
> > preference. the sounds in the mp-7 is just what i want for 
original 
> > instrumentation, however as far as samples are concerned, and 
> drums. 
> > the mpc also gives me the sound, and options to manipulate the 
> > samples the way i intend to do so. i also like the facts that 
they 
> > are both desktop units as opposed to rack mount. again these are 
> > just my personal preferances. nothing right or wrong. i do 
> > appreciate the advise and ideas that you have provided me. thank 
> you.
> > 
> > --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "glennjamison" <glennjamison@h...> 
> wrote:
> > > I would personally find that combination a little redundant. 
That 
> > is 
> > > having both an MPC2000 and an MP-7. You can very easily add 
> > sampling 
> > > capabilities to the MP-7 at a fraction of the price of an AKAI 
> MPC-
> > > 2000.  I have an E-mu E6400 Ultra and use the triggers on the 
MP-
> 7 
> > to 
> > > trigger samples from the E6400.  You can get an E-5000 Ultra 
> > nowadays 
> > > for about $500 on e-bay and the e-mu samplers and the MP-7 
merge 
> > > together quite seamlessly.  I know this isn't the answer to the 
> > > question that you asked but you may want to look into it.  It 
> > would 
> > > save you some serious cash.
> > > 
> > > Glenn
> > > 
> > > --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "my nickname (tag name) is all you 
> > need 
> > > to know" <trez260_2000@y...> wrote:
> > > > I CURRENTLY HAVE A ROLAND VM-3100PRO MIXER(THE ROLAND STUDIO 
> > > > PACKAGED THAT USED TO BE ADVERTISED IN THE EQUIPMENT MAGS,)
> > THAT'S 
> > > > CONNECTED TO A SOUND CARD IN THE BACK OF MY COMPUTER. I WAS 
> > WANTING 
> > > > TO KNOW WHAT WOULD BE THE BEST WAY FOR ME TO HOOK MY MP-7 TO 
MY 
> > > > MIXER. I'LL BE GETTIN THE AKAI MPC2000XL IN ABOUT 2 MONTHS 
AND 
> I 
> > > > WANNA BE ABLE TO UTILIZE ALL THE SAMPLING FEATURES THAT THE 
MPC 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > HAS 
> > > > TO OFFER AS WELL AS ALL THE SOUND FEATURES THE MP-7 HAS TO 
> > OFFER. 
> > > > THANKS FOR ALL THE HELP. HOLLA. ONE.

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.