Emu XL-7 & MP-7 User's Group

AWRIGHT.
I CREATE MAINLY DNB/JUNGLE (DARK, JAZZY, TECHY)
I NEED A MACHINE THAT CAN MAKE ME DOZE PHAT BEEFY-ENRICHED SNARES AND 
DEEP HEAVY-BREATHING BASES THAT JUST CREEP AND BOUNCE NICE AND 
SMOOTHLY.  SOMETIMES SOME HARD HEAVY METTALIC BASS IS COOL TOO.  I'VE 
BEEN LOOKING FOR GOOD HARDWARE FOR THE PAST COUPLE OF MONTHS.  MY 
MIND IS ALMOST SET ON THE MP-7.  I'VE CHECKED OUT THE XL-7,AND PEEPS 
TOLD ME NOT TO GET IT FOR WHAT I LIKE MAKING SINCE IT IS MORE TRANCE 
ORIENTED.  ANY GOOD, HONEST SUGGESTIONS FROM PEOPLE WHO HAVE THESE 
TWO MACHINES? ANY DNB ARTISTS USING EITHER OF THESE MACHINE?  WHICH 
ONE WILL SUITE MY PURPOSES MORE?  JUST AFTER READING MANY THINGS 
LATELY BOUT THE MP-7 I'M STARTING TO THINK IT HAS MANY PROBLEMS---I 
DON'T LIKE TO SPEND TIME ON PROBLEMS WHEN I DONT HAVE TO.  I GOT 
ABOUT 1200 TO SPEND AND I'M NOT SURE IF I SHOULD GET AN MP OR XL-7 
WITH A NICE E5000 ULTRA SAMPLER(USED),A CHEAP BEHRINGER MIXER         
OR GET AN MC 909      OR RS7000 AND IS THE RS7000 OR MC 909 GOOD?
I'D REALLY APPRECIATE SOME ADVICE FROM YOU GUYS WHO REALLY KNOW BOUT 
THIS STUFF.  ANYTHING WOULD HELP.  MY HEAD HURTS FROM GOING BACK AND 
FOURTH ON MACHINES AND CHANGING MY MIND OVER AND OVER CAUSE OF GOOD 
OR BAD REVIEWS.  I'M SURE MOST OF YOU HAVE GONE THROUGH THIS AND YOU 
KNOW IT AINT FUN AND IS EXTREMELY FRUSTRATING.  I KNOW ITS PERSONAL 
PREFERENCE, BUT THE THING IS....I HAVEN'T HAD A CHANCE TO GET ADVICE 
FROM ANY DNB/JUNGLE ARTIST YET TO SEE WHAT THEY RECOMMEND DOR THIS 
TYPE OF MUSIC.  ALSO ONE THE COMMAND STATIONS, HOW CAN YOU SAVE YOUR 
MUSIC TO DISK IF YOU EVEN CAN????

I'm selling an Audity 2000, it has the dark sounds your after.  You should
really pick up something like this and fruityloops for your sequencer/sampler,
that way you get a kickass synthesizer with dark basses and crazy arpegiators
with the excellent sequencer and sampler in fruityloops.  I have been doing DNB
trip hop and darker stuff for a long time, and this might be up your alley.  Let
me know if your interested, US only though, it's crazy expensive to ship
overseas.

Andre

-----Original Message-----
From: dj4tfy [mailto:dj4tfy@...]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 2:25 AM
To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [xl7] AdV!Ce 0N Wh@T To GeT????


AWRIGHT.
I CREATE MAINLY DNB/JUNGLE (DARK, JAZZY, TECHY)
I NEED A MACHINE THAT CAN MAKE ME DOZE PHAT BEEFY-ENRICHED SNARES AND
DEEP HEAVY-BREATHING BASES THAT JUST CREEP AND BOUNCE NICE AND
SMOOTHLY.  SOMETIMES SOME HARD HEAVY METTALIC BASS IS COOL TOO.  I'VE
BEEN LOOKING FOR GOOD HARDWARE FOR THE PAST COUPLE OF MONTHS.  MY
MIND IS ALMOST SET ON THE MP-7.  I'VE CHECKED OUT THE XL-7,AND PEEPS
TOLD ME NOT TO GET IT FOR WHAT I LIKE MAKING SINCE IT IS MORE TRANCE
ORIENTED.  ANY GOOD, HONEST SUGGESTIONS FROM PEOPLE WHO HAVE THESE
TWO MACHINES? ANY DNB ARTISTS USING EITHER OF THESE MACHINE?  WHICH
ONE WILL SUITE MY PURPOSES MORE?  JUST AFTER READING MANY THINGS
LATELY BOUT THE MP-7 I'M STARTING TO THINK IT HAS MANY PROBLEMS---I
DON'T LIKE TO SPEND TIME ON PROBLEMS WHEN I DONT HAVE TO.  I GOT
ABOUT 1200 TO SPEND AND I'M NOT SURE IF I SHOULD GET AN MP OR XL-7
WITH A NICE E5000 ULTRA SAMPLER(USED),A CHEAP BEHRINGER MIXER
OR GET AN MC 909      OR RS7000 AND IS THE RS7000 OR MC 909 GOOD?
I'D REALLY APPRECIATE SOME ADVICE FROM YOU GUYS WHO REALLY KNOW BOUT
THIS STUFF.  ANYTHING WOULD HELP.  MY HEAD HURTS FROM GOING BACK AND
FOURTH ON MACHINES AND CHANGING MY MIND OVER AND OVER CAUSE OF GOOD
OR BAD REVIEWS.  I'M SURE MOST OF YOU HAVE GONE THROUGH THIS AND YOU
KNOW IT AINT FUN AND IS EXTREMELY FRUSTRATING.  I KNOW ITS PERSONAL
PREFERENCE, BUT THE THING IS....I HAVEN'T HAD A CHANCE TO GET ADVICE
FROM ANY DNB/JUNGLE ARTIST YET TO SEE WHAT THEY RECOMMEND DOR THIS
TYPE OF MUSIC.  ALSO ONE THE COMMAND STATIONS, HOW CAN YOU SAVE YOUR
MUSIC TO DISK IF YOU EVEN CAN????


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

wow dude what is up with the caps?

Ok well I use a XL-7 and a E5000 with a 10 gig drive and 128MB of 
ram.  I love this set up.  I have not spent alot of time with the MP 
but from the time that i did spend I think that you would be better 
off with the XL even though alot of the sounds are tech/trance'ish.

I truly dont think any synth is going to give you alot of the drum 
sounds that you are looking for.  Jungle is after all started off a 
sampler based music, like hip hop.  It's roots are in sampled drum 
loops and hits riped apart and reconstructed. As for heavy bass 
there is alot of it in the XL.  I feel that the bass sounds in the 
xl are truly one of its strong points.

As for the new 909 from what i have read it seems that it is still 
rely buggy.  I kinda wish that it where perfict becouse i get sick 
of setting up program changes and setting up all the controllers for 
my E5000.  But it seems that there is alot to work out with that box.

And for the rs7000 I think that the sequencer in that box is great.  
But the synth is very weak in comparison with the XL/MP's.  There ya 
go.  Hope that helps more than confuzes.

You can email me directly if you have more questions about my setup.
curiousproductions@...

Mike G.


--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "dj4tfy" <dj4tfy@s...> wrote:
> AWRIGHT.
> I CREATE MAINLY DNB/JUNGLE (DARK, JAZZY, TECHY)
> I NEED A MACHINE THAT CAN MAKE ME DOZE PHAT BEEFY-ENRICHED SNARES 
AND 
> DEEP HEAVY-BREATHING BASES THAT JUST CREEP AND BOUNCE NICE AND 
> SMOOTHLY.  SOMETIMES SOME HARD HEAVY METTALIC BASS IS COOL TOO.  
I'VE 
> BEEN LOOKING FOR GOOD HARDWARE FOR THE PAST COUPLE OF MONTHS.  MY 
> MIND IS ALMOST SET ON THE MP-7.  I'VE CHECKED OUT THE XL-7,AND 
PEEPS 
> TOLD ME NOT TO GET IT FOR WHAT I LIKE MAKING SINCE IT IS MORE 
TRANCE 
> ORIENTED.  ANY GOOD, HONEST SUGGESTIONS FROM PEOPLE WHO HAVE THESE 
> TWO MACHINES? ANY DNB ARTISTS USING EITHER OF THESE MACHINE?  
WHICH 
> ONE WILL SUITE MY PURPOSES MORE?  JUST AFTER READING MANY THINGS 
> LATELY BOUT THE MP-7 I'M STARTING TO THINK IT HAS MANY PROBLEMS---
I 
> DON'T LIKE TO SPEND TIME ON PROBLEMS WHEN I DONT HAVE TO.  I GOT 
> ABOUT 1200 TO SPEND AND I'M NOT SURE IF I SHOULD GET AN MP OR XL-7 
> WITH A NICE E5000 ULTRA SAMPLER(USED),A CHEAP BEHRINGER 
MIXER         
> OR GET AN MC 909      OR RS7000 AND IS THE RS7000 OR MC 909 GOOD?
> I'D REALLY APPRECIATE SOME ADVICE FROM YOU GUYS WHO REALLY KNOW 
BOUT 
> THIS STUFF.  ANYTHING WOULD HELP.  MY HEAD HURTS FROM GOING BACK 
AND 
> FOURTH ON MACHINES AND CHANGING MY MIND OVER AND OVER CAUSE OF 
GOOD 
> OR BAD REVIEWS.  I'M SURE MOST OF YOU HAVE GONE THROUGH THIS AND 
YOU 
> KNOW IT AINT FUN AND IS EXTREMELY FRUSTRATING.  I KNOW ITS 
PERSONAL 
> PREFERENCE, BUT THE THING IS....I HAVEN'T HAD A CHANCE TO GET 
ADVICE 
> FROM ANY DNB/JUNGLE ARTIST YET TO SEE WHAT THEY RECOMMEND DOR THIS 
> TYPE OF MUSIC.  ALSO ONE THE COMMAND STATIONS, HOW CAN YOU SAVE 
YOUR 
> MUSIC TO DISK IF YOU EVEN CAN????

This is in fact interesting. I myself have just decided to buy the 
Audity 2000. I do a dark sort of trance and techno myself and have 
found the soundset and arpeggios on the Xl7 to lean more to the "pop" 
side. To my tastes, they just aren't heavy or have that "fuzzy" feel 
i'm after. I love the sequencer and effects and the fact that you can 
run an entire studio from it though.  Grrr... so I'd buy back my XP30 
in a heatbeat and want to buy maybe a triton or motif next after the 
audity.




--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "mikexl7" <curiousproductions@r...> wrote:
> wow dude what is up with the caps?
> 
> Ok well I use a XL-7 and a E5000 with a 10 gig drive and 128MB of 
> ram.  I love this set up.  I have not spent alot of time with the 
MP 
> but from the time that i did spend I think that you would be better 
> off with the XL even though alot of the sounds are tech/trance'ish.
> 
> I truly dont think any synth is going to give you alot of the drum 
> sounds that you are looking for.  Jungle is after all started off a 
> sampler based music, like hip hop.  It's roots are in sampled drum 
> loops and hits riped apart and reconstructed. As for heavy bass 
> there is alot of it in the XL.  I feel that the bass sounds in the 
> xl are truly one of its strong points.
> 
> As for the new 909 from what i have read it seems that it is still 
> rely buggy.  I kinda wish that it where perfict becouse i get sick 
> of setting up program changes and setting up all the controllers 
for 
> my E5000.  But it seems that there is alot to work out with that 
box.
> 
> And for the rs7000 I think that the sequencer in that box is 
great.  
> But the synth is very weak in comparison with the XL/MP's.  There 
ya 
> go.  Hope that helps more than confuzes.
> 
> You can email me directly if you have more questions about my setup.
> curiousproductions@r...
> 
> Mike G.
> 
> 
> --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "dj4tfy" <dj4tfy@s...> wrote:
> > AWRIGHT.
> > I CREATE MAINLY DNB/JUNGLE (DARK, JAZZY, TECHY)
> > I NEED A MACHINE THAT CAN MAKE ME DOZE PHAT BEEFY-ENRICHED SNARES 
> AND 
> > DEEP HEAVY-BREATHING BASES THAT JUST CREEP AND BOUNCE NICE AND 
> > SMOOTHLY.  SOMETIMES SOME HARD HEAVY METTALIC BASS IS COOL TOO.  
> I'VE 
> > BEEN LOOKING FOR GOOD HARDWARE FOR THE PAST COUPLE OF MONTHS.  MY 
> > MIND IS ALMOST SET ON THE MP-7.  I'VE CHECKED OUT THE XL-7,AND 
> PEEPS 
> > TOLD ME NOT TO GET IT FOR WHAT I LIKE MAKING SINCE IT IS MORE 
> TRANCE 
> > ORIENTED.  ANY GOOD, HONEST SUGGESTIONS FROM PEOPLE WHO HAVE 
THESE 
> > TWO MACHINES? ANY DNB ARTISTS USING EITHER OF THESE MACHINE?  
> WHICH 
> > ONE WILL SUITE MY PURPOSES MORE?  JUST AFTER READING MANY THINGS 
> > LATELY BOUT THE MP-7 I'M STARTING TO THINK IT HAS MANY PROBLEMS---
> I 
> > DON'T LIKE TO SPEND TIME ON PROBLEMS WHEN I DONT HAVE TO.  I GOT 
> > ABOUT 1200 TO SPEND AND I'M NOT SURE IF I SHOULD GET AN MP OR XL-
7 
> > WITH A NICE E5000 ULTRA SAMPLER(USED),A CHEAP BEHRINGER 
> MIXER         
> > OR GET AN MC 909      OR RS7000 AND IS THE RS7000 OR MC 909 GOOD?
> > I'D REALLY APPRECIATE SOME ADVICE FROM YOU GUYS WHO REALLY KNOW 
> BOUT 
> > THIS STUFF.  ANYTHING WOULD HELP.  MY HEAD HURTS FROM GOING BACK 
> AND 
> > FOURTH ON MACHINES AND CHANGING MY MIND OVER AND OVER CAUSE OF 
> GOOD 
> > OR BAD REVIEWS.  I'M SURE MOST OF YOU HAVE GONE THROUGH THIS AND 
> YOU 
> > KNOW IT AINT FUN AND IS EXTREMELY FRUSTRATING.  I KNOW ITS 
> PERSONAL 
> > PREFERENCE, BUT THE THING IS....I HAVEN'T HAD A CHANCE TO GET 
> ADVICE 
> > FROM ANY DNB/JUNGLE ARTIST YET TO SEE WHAT THEY RECOMMEND DOR 
THIS 

> > TYPE OF MUSIC.  ALSO ONE THE COMMAND STATIONS, HOW CAN YOU SAVE 
> YOUR 
> > MUSIC TO DISK IF YOU EVEN CAN????

> I myself have just decided to buy the 
> Audity 2000. I do a dark sort of trance and techno myself and have 
> found the soundset and arpeggios on the Xl7 to lean more to the "pop" 
> side.

But the Audity 2000 is almost a pure subset of the XL-7, so if you
don't like the XL-7 the Audity doesn't have much to recommend it,
except that (i) it's smaller and (ii) it's very cheap at the moment.

-- 

  nick rothwell -- composition, systems, performance -- http://www.cassiel.com

huh really? the demos I heard, I couldnt tell..



--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, Nick Rothwell <nick@c...> wrote:
> > I myself have just decided to buy the 
> > Audity 2000. I do a dark sort of trance and techno myself and 
have 
> > found the soundset and arpeggios on the Xl7 to lean more to 
the "pop" 
> > side.
> 
> But the Audity 2000 is almost a pure subset of the XL-7, so if you
> don't like the XL-7 the Audity doesn't have much to recommend it,
> except that (i) it's smaller and (ii) it's very cheap at the moment.
> 
> -- 
> 
>   nick rothwell -- composition, systems, performance -- 
http://www.cassiel.com

Better to get an XL1 than an audity 2000

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Nick Rothwell 
  To: xl7@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 9:50 AM
  Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: AdV!Ce 0N Wh@T To GeT????


  > I myself have just decided to buy the 
  > Audity 2000. I do a dark sort of trance and techno myself and have 
  > found the soundset and arpeggios on the Xl7 to lean more to the "pop" 
  > side.

  But the Audity 2000 is almost a pure subset of the XL-7, so if you
  don't like the XL-7 the Audity doesn't have much to recommend it,
  except that (i) it's smaller and (ii) it's very cheap at the moment.

  -- 

    nick rothwell -- composition, systems, performance -- http://www.cassiel.com

        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
              ADVERTISEMENT
             
       
       

  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Even thought he Audity 2000 is a subset of the XL-1, the standard presets
for each do have very distinctive personalities. The Audity 2000 does have a
much edgier selection of presets. The group of preset programmers we used
for each project were different as well as given different design goals.
Technically you can put all of the Audity 2000 presets in to an XL-1 or
XL-7. There would be a about 2 minutes of re work required for each preset
ported over via sysex and you would need an A2K to grab the presets from.

sean at e-mu
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ravi Ivan Sharma" <noision1@...>
To: <xl7@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: AdV!Ce 0N Wh@T To GeT????


> Better to get an XL1 than an audity 2000
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Nick Rothwell
>   To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
>   Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 9:50 AM
>   Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: AdV!Ce 0N Wh@T To GeT????
>
>
>   > I myself have just decided to buy the
>   > Audity 2000. I do a dark sort of trance and techno myself and have
>   > found the soundset and arpeggios on the Xl7 to lean more to the "pop"
>   > side.
>
>   But the Audity 2000 is almost a pure subset of the XL-7, so if you
>   don't like the XL-7 the Audity doesn't have much to recommend it,
>   except that (i) it's smaller and (ii) it's very cheap at the moment.
>
>   --
>
>     nick rothwell -- composition, systems, performance --
http://www.cassiel.com

>
>         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>               ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>   xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

Ok, what do I have to do?  I have an Audity and an XL-7...

Andre

-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Wilhelmsen [mailto:seanw@...]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 10:38 AM
To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: AdV!Ce 0N Wh@T To GeT????


Even thought he Audity 2000 is a subset of the XL-1, the standard presets
for each do have very distinctive personalities. The Audity 2000 does have a
much edgier selection of presets. The group of preset programmers we used
for each project were different as well as given different design goals.
Technically you can put all of the Audity 2000 presets in to an XL-1 or
XL-7. There would be a about 2 minutes of re work required for each preset
ported over via sysex and you would need an A2K to grab the presets from.

sean at e-mu
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ravi Ivan Sharma" <noision1@...>
To: <xl7@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: AdV!Ce 0N Wh@T To GeT????


> Better to get an XL1 than an audity 2000
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Nick Rothwell
>   To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
>   Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 9:50 AM
>   Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: AdV!Ce 0N Wh@T To GeT????
>
>
>   > I myself have just decided to buy the
>   > Audity 2000. I do a dark sort of trance and techno myself and have
>   > found the soundset and arpeggios on the Xl7 to lean more to the "pop"
>   > side.
>
>   But the Audity 2000 is almost a pure subset of the XL-7, so if you
>   don't like the XL-7 the Audity doesn't have much to recommend it,
>   except that (i) it's smaller and (ii) it's very cheap at the moment.
>
>   --
>
>     nick rothwell -- composition, systems, performance --
http://www.cassiel.com
>
>         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>               ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>   xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Make sure you have any custom users presets backed up in your XL-7.

step 1: Dump any preset or whole banks from your Audity 2000's user
locations into the XL-7 via sysex. MIDI out of A2K to MIDI in of XL-7 and
then initiate a dump with the A2K. The banks or preset numbers will line up.

step 2: Once the preset is in the XL-7, you will have to reassign the
instruments for each layer and the Arp pattern. Basically anything that
points to the ROM. You will probably have to refer back to the Audity 2000
for assistance in referencing patterns and instruments.

step 3: Save your new preset. Keep in mind these new presets will be using
the Audity 2000 knob layout.

sean at e-mu
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andre Lewis" <andrel@...>
To: <xl7@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 2:53 PM
Subject: RE: [xl7] Re: AdV!Ce 0N Wh@T To GeT????


> Ok, what do I have to do?  I have an Audity and an XL-7...
>
> Andre
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Wilhelmsen [mailto:seanw@...]
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 10:38 AM
> To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: AdV!Ce 0N Wh@T To GeT????
>
>
> Even thought he Audity 2000 is a subset of the XL-1, the standard presets
> for each do have very distinctive personalities. The Audity 2000 does have
a
> much edgier selection of presets. The group of preset programmers we used
> for each project were different as well as given different design goals.
> Technically you can put all of the Audity 2000 presets in to an XL-1 or
> XL-7. There would be a about 2 minutes of re work required for each preset
> ported over via sysex and you would need an A2K to grab the presets from.
>
> sean at e-mu
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ravi Ivan Sharma" <noision1@...>
> To: <xl7@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 10:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: AdV!Ce 0N Wh@T To GeT????
>
>
> > Better to get an XL1 than an audity 2000
> >   ----- Original Message -----
> >   From: Nick Rothwell
> >   To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
> >   Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 9:50 AM
> >   Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: AdV!Ce 0N Wh@T To GeT????
> >
> >
> >   > I myself have just decided to buy the
> >   > Audity 2000. I do a dark sort of trance and techno myself and have
> >   > found the soundset and arpeggios on the Xl7 to lean more to the
"pop"
> >   > side.
> >
> >   But the Audity 2000 is almost a pure subset of the XL-7, so if you
> >   don't like the XL-7 the Audity doesn't have much to recommend it,
> >   except that (i) it's smaller and (ii) it's very cheap at the moment.
> >
> >   --
> >
> >     nick rothwell -- composition, systems, performance --
> http://www.cassiel.com
> >
> >         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> >               ADVERTISEMENT
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >   xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> >   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

This could be scripted, along with the conversion of the planet phatt 
module presets. I'm sure that there is someone on this list with the 
perl skills to do a mass conversion - all that we would need would be 
the sysex documents for both modules. Has anyone seen these? 

On a very slightly related note - is there a cc number for voice 
soloing the presets? I've found that the majority of the presets are 
too rich for my purposes, but sound really great if I turn off one or 
two voices. 

If this can't be done via cc numbers, a quick search and replace of 
the patch sysexs would instantly make these accessible.

Is emu planning on releasing a librarian for the P2k engine? A simple 
conversion of the p2k module for sound diver would be a godsend.

(Though the death of emagic pc platform might mean no new modules for 
us pc'ers :/)

bIz

----- Original Message -----
From: Andre Lewis
To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 2:53 PM
Subject: RE: [xl7] Re: AdV!Ce 0N Wh@T To GeT????


Ok, what do I have to do?  I have an Audity and an XL-7...

Andre

-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Wilhelmsen [mailto:seanw@...]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 10:38 AM
To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: AdV!Ce 0N Wh@T To GeT????


Even thought he Audity 2000 is a subset of the XL-1, the standard 
presets
for each do have very distinctive personalities. The Audity 2000 does 
have a
much edgier selection of presets. The group of preset programmers we 
used
for each project were different as well as given different design 
goals.
Technically you can put all of the Audity 2000 presets in to an XL-1 
or
XL-7. There would be a about 2 minutes of re work required for each 
preset
ported over via sysex and you would need an A2K to grab the presets 
from.

sean at e-mu
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ravi Ivan Sharma" <noision1@...>
To: <xl7@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: AdV!Ce 0N Wh@T To GeT????


> Better to get an XL1 than an audity 2000
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Nick Rothwell
>   To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
>   Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 9:50 AM
>   Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: AdV!Ce 0N Wh@T To GeT????
>
>
>   > I myself have just decided to buy the
>   > Audity 2000. I do a dark sort of trance and techno myself and 
have
>   > found the soundset and arpeggios on the Xl7 to lean more to 
the "pop"
>   > side.
>
>   But the Audity 2000 is almost a pure subset of the XL-7, so if you
>   don't like the XL-7 the Audity doesn't have much to recommend it,
>   except that (i) it's smaller and (ii) it's very cheap at the 
moment.
>
>   --
>
>     nick rothwell -- composition, systems, performance --
http://www.cassiel.com
>
>         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>               ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>   xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of 
Service.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/






Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

All the samples have the same name, but the rom ID is different for each one
right?  If I had a hex editor what would I have to do for each preset if I dump
it into say Sonar?

Andre

-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Wilhelmsen [mailto:seanw@...]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 3:39 PM
To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: AdV!Ce 0N Wh@T To GeT????


Make sure you have any custom users presets backed up in your XL-7.

step 1: Dump any preset or whole banks from your Audity 2000's user
locations into the XL-7 via sysex. MIDI out of A2K to MIDI in of XL-7 and
then initiate a dump with the A2K. The banks or preset numbers will line up.

step 2: Once the preset is in the XL-7, you will have to reassign the
instruments for each layer and the Arp pattern. Basically anything that
points to the ROM. You will probably have to refer back to the Audity 2000
for assistance in referencing patterns and instruments.

step 3: Save your new preset. Keep in mind these new presets will be using
the Audity 2000 knob layout.

sean at e-mu
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andre Lewis" <andrel@...>
To: <xl7@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 2:53 PM
Subject: RE: [xl7] Re: AdV!Ce 0N Wh@T To GeT????


> Ok, what do I have to do?  I have an Audity and an XL-7...
>
> Andre
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Wilhelmsen [mailto:seanw@...]
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 10:38 AM
> To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: AdV!Ce 0N Wh@T To GeT????
>
>
> Even thought he Audity 2000 is a subset of the XL-1, the standard presets
> for each do have very distinctive personalities. The Audity 2000 does have
a
> much edgier selection of presets. The group of preset programmers we used
> for each project were different as well as given different design goals.
> Technically you can put all of the Audity 2000 presets in to an XL-1 or
> XL-7. There would be a about 2 minutes of re work required for each preset
> ported over via sysex and you would need an A2K to grab the presets from.
>
> sean at e-mu
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ravi Ivan Sharma" <noision1@...>
> To: <xl7@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 10:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: AdV!Ce 0N Wh@T To GeT????
>
>
> > Better to get an XL1 than an audity 2000
> >   ----- Original Message -----
> >   From: Nick Rothwell
> >   To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
> >   Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 9:50 AM
> >   Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: AdV!Ce 0N Wh@T To GeT????
> >
> >
> >   > I myself have just decided to buy the
> >   > Audity 2000. I do a dark sort of trance and techno myself and have
> >   > found the soundset and arpeggios on the Xl7 to lean more to the
"pop"
> >   > side.
> >
> >   But the Audity 2000 is almost a pure subset of the XL-7, so if you
> >   don't like the XL-7 the Audity doesn't have much to recommend it,
> >   except that (i) it's smaller and (ii) it's very cheap at the moment.
> >
> >   --
> >
> >     nick rothwell -- composition, systems, performance --
> http://www.cassiel.com
> >
> >         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> >               ADVERTISEMENT
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >   xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> >   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/