Synth-DIY Yahoo! Groups Archives

Thread

circuit bending a CS

2011-03-30 by James Ulibarri

this is nothing I would do considering the gibberish unusable sounds that bending renders. (to my ears)
maybe if you're doing glitch or noisecore stuff i guess it would have it's place. but i have to hand it to this guy for the enormous nuts he displayed by doing this to a CS. kinda cool that he put the switches in the sides that remove.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKIDokPVqvc

i gotta give him props for coloring out of the lines and being different with the command station

Re: [xl7] circuit bending a CS

2011-03-30 by Atom Smasher

On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, James Ulibarri wrote:

> this is nothing I would do considering the gibberish unusable sounds 
> that bending renders.  (to my ears) maybe if you're doing glitch or 
> noisecore stuff i guess it would have it's place.  but i have to hand it 
> to this guy for the enormous nuts he displayed by doing this to a CS. 
> kinda cool that he put the switches in the sides that remove.
=================

for a tiny fraction of a second that seemed like a good idea: then i 
remembered that i know how to program sounds using the provided interface 
and using the provided controllers ;)

everything he's doing with his CS, i could do without drilling any holes.


-- 
         ...atom

  ________________________
  http://atom.smasher.org/
  762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
  -------------------------------------------------

 	"We really haven't done everything we could to protect our
 	 customers... Our products just aren't engineered for security"
 		-- Brian Valentine,
 		Senior Vice President of Microsoft, Windows Division

Re: [xl7] circuit bending a CS

2011-03-31 by James Ulibarri

"everything he's doing with his CS, i could do without drilling any holes."

ha! nice, dude.

me too.. :)

illformed.org/plugins/glitch/

anyone running a CS with MAX/MSP? that would be kinda sick

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Atom Smasher <atom@...> wrote:

On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, James Ulibarri wrote:

> this is nothing I would do considering the gibberish unusable sounds
> that bending renders. (to my ears) maybe if you're doing glitch or
> noisecore stuff i guess it would have it's place. but i have to hand it
> to this guy for the enormous nuts he displayed by doing this to a CS.
> kinda cool that he put the switches in the sides that remove.
=================

for a tiny fraction of a second that seemed like a good idea: then i
remembered that i know how to program sounds using the provided interface
and using the provided controllers ;)

everything he's doing with his CS, i could do without drilling any holes.

--
...atom

________________________
http://atom.smasher.org/
762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
-------------------------------------------------

"We really haven't done everything we could to protect our
customers... Our products just aren't engineered for security"
-- Brian Valentine,
Senior Vice President of Microsoft, Windows Division

Re: [xl7] circuit bending a CS

2011-03-31 by Scott Solmonson

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:10 PM, James Ulibarri <jamesulibarri@...> wrote:

anyone running a CS with MAX/MSP? that would be kinda sick

For algorithmic or generational stuff I run everything with Max/MSP, or Puredata depending on my mood/OS.

For live interaction, no.

--
NUNQUAM NON PARATUS

Re: [xl7] circuit bending a CS

2011-03-31 by James Ulibarri

oh wow. i want to learn pure data so bad for audio reactive visuals.

such as..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0Mvj024I-0&feature=related

you're way ahead of the game than 97.9% of people on here..

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Scott Solmonson <scosol@...> wrote:

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:10 PM, James Ulibarri <jamesulibarri@...> wrote:

anyone running a CS with MAX/MSP? that would be kinda sick

For algorithmic or generational stuff I run everything with Max/MSP, or Puredata depending on my mood/OS.

For live interaction, no.

--
NUNQUAM NON PARATUS

Re: [xl7] circuit bending a CS

2011-03-31 by Scott Solmonson

They're essentially the same, and if your mind is already wired to understand the mechanics of programing subtractive, additive, and FM synthesis it's pretty easy to learn.

My own experience is that when you move to that kind of software, the control/command structures expand greatly, but nobody wants to tweak little bits of the math in the FFT section of the PD audio realm (at least I certainly don't).

So- my use is more on the control side, which means I need a very capable sound-renderer, which is why I'm on this list :)

Re visuals, PD isn't well suited for anything beyond "basics"- I've created art installations in Max/MSP and then redid them in PD because I thought it would be "cleaner", but it's not. Every kind of visual programming environment like that seems to suffer from a "difficulty of recursion problem", and Jitter (companion to Max/MSP is very capable) (but Mac-only)- by comparison the PD visual packages (Framestein and GEM) are immature.

http://cycling74.com/products/maxmspjitter/

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:14 PM, James Ulibarri <jamesulibarri@...> wrote:

oh wow. i want to learn pure data so bad for audio reactive visuals.

such as..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0Mvj024I-0&feature=related

you're way ahead of the game than 97.9% of people on here..

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Scott Solmonson <scosol@...> wrote:

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:10 PM, James Ulibarri <jamesulibarri@...> wrote:

anyone running a CS with MAX/MSP? that would be kinda sick

For algorithmic or generational stuff I run everything with Max/MSP, or Puredata depending on my mood/OS.

For live interaction, no.

--
NUNQUAM NON PARATUS

--
NUNQUAM NON PARATUS

Re: [xl7] circuit bending a CS

2011-03-31 by Bruno

2011/3/31 Scott Solmonson <scosol@...>
> Re visuals, PD isn't well suited for anything beyond "basics"- I've created art installations in Max/MSP and then redid them in PD because I thought it would be "cleaner", but it's not. Every kind of visual programming environment like that seems to suffer from a "difficulty of recursion problem", and Jitter (companion to Max/MSP is very capable) (but Mac-only)- by comparison the PD visual packages (Framestein and GEM) are immature.

What about Impromptu? As long as someone doesn't mind programming in Scheme...

http://impromptu.moso.com.au/