YES YOU DECIPHERED COREECTLY - I am trying to find out how to change
parameters internally and I figured that looping it via midi track
rechannelization back into the track might have been the resolution
because the knob assignments only go so far ... and I thought that if
the data was changed and then rechannelized back onto the track again
it would allow for realtime adjustments that would keep adjusting the
parameters even though the knobs only go as far as they do ... so if
this is case is it possible to do this in realtime or is it possible
to do this all internally but not in realtime and how... ? btw thank
you so much for understanding like you do ! YOU ARE VERY SMART !
--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, Aaron Eppolito <synthesis77@y...> wrote:
>
> My only attempt at deciphering the original question is as
follows. I think he's asking if there's any way to internally loop
the MIDI output of a track back into the track, possibly with some
processing. From a parameter or audio point of view that sort of
makes sense (i.e. feeding back parameter changes can produce
interesting effects and feeding back audio can yield filters,
flangers, and the like). However, looping back MIDI isn't really
useful.
>
> Imagine a piano concert where the pianist asks the someone in
the audience to play every note he plays immediately after he plays
it, then asks that audience member to pick another audience member
to play every note the first one plays, and so on. -- The pianist
plays the first C#. Then an audience member comes up and plays it
again and nominates another member. They play it and nominate a
third and so on. Pretty soon, the whole audience is piled on top of
the piano, and we haven't even gotten past the first note in the
piece to be played...
>
> -Aaron
>
> Mibrilane <mibrilane@c...> wrote: A valiant attempt to figure out
what the heck he was asking, Steve. I
> didn't even try to answer because I have no idea what the question
> is. ;D
>
> On Jan 28, 2006, at 3:47 PM, steve_the_composer wrote:
>
> > I will dissect your message into parts that make sense to me and
> > parts that make no sense to me. I will also ask questions and
make
> > comments to try to figure out what you are trying to do with your
E-
> > Mu.
> >
> > Other ways to try to understand your questions(s) include:
> > (1) State specifically what you are trying to do.
> > (2) Restate your question(s) using different words.
> >
> > There are several people here who might be able to help you do
what
> > you want, but--at least to me--it is unclear what you are trying
to
> > do. I hope the following helps.
> >
> > --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "lifeistheformofenergy"
> >
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I am not using
> >> any external midi gear - I just want to stay in the XX7
> >
> > I understand the first part (above.)
> >
> >> and yet go
> >> beyond it's parameters
> >
> > I am not sure what this (above) means.
> >
> >> if so possible the thing is that there might
> >> be some code embedded in the XX7
> >
> > Yes, there is "code" in the E-Mu.
> >
> >> that actually prevents this sort of
> >> thing from happening
> >
> > This makes no sense to me. Prevents what sort of thing? If you
> > mean "prevents a user from going beyond the E-Mu's parameters,"
what
> > do you want to try to do that you cannot seem to do using the E-
Mu's
> > parameters?
> >
> >> which is also what I am asking - what exactly gets
> >> sent out
> >
> > This makes no sense to me since you are not sending anything out
of
> > your E-Mu--except for audio (and I assume you are getting audio
from
> > your E-Mu). Your question "what exactly gets sent out" would make
> > sense to me if you were sending midi data out to another device.
I
> > guess my question here is: Sent out from where TO where?
> >
> >> and if rerouted
> >
> > Are you talking about patch cords? If not, what?
> >
> >> what gets interpreted as actual effect
> >
> > Are you talking about the effects processor? If not what?
> >
> >> during imput
> >
> > Input FROM what INTO what?
> >
> > - if other gear is used for effects
> >
> > Wait a second--you said you are not using external gear. What is
> > your native language? Perhaps something is being lost in
translation?
> >
> >> - does it
> >
> > What is "it?" The E-Mu or external gear that you are not using?
> >
> >> correctly interpret the sysex
> >
> > Most synth gear (including E-Mus) correctly interpret sysex.
> >
> >> or will it
> >
> > Again, is "it" the E-Mu or external gear that you are not using?
> >
> >> leave it
> >
> > HUH??????? Leave the sysex data?????????
> >
> >> only as note on or off
> >
> > Note on and note off data are not system exclusive data. Are you
> > asking if sysex data will mess up note on/off data?
> >
> >> ... how can a rechannelized track be set up
> >
> > I understand the start of this question.
> >
> >> so that it acts as though it
> >
> > By "it" do you mean the rechannelized track? Does "it" in the
second
> > half of the above mean the same thing as "it" in the first half?
> >
> >> is continues
> >
> > Not sure what you mean by this (above).
> >
> >> or realtime
> >
> > Not sure what you mean by this (above) either.
> >
> >> and still keeps changing the effect information ...
> >
> > Are you talking about the effects processor? If not, what do you
> > mean by "effect information?"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---
> Mibrilane
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, &
more on new and used cars.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>