Yahoo Groups archive

Emu XL-7 & MP-7 User's Group

Index last updated: 2026-03-31 23:44 UTC

Thread

A REPLY TO AARON & OTHERS WHO BIT MY HEAD OFF : ).

A REPLY TO AARON & OTHERS WHO BIT MY HEAD OFF : ).

2002-02-05 by argomax2002

Firts of all, thanks for answering promptly.
As I said earlier, I hope I did not offend anyone.
I have copied/pasted  Aaron's reply and added my own in capital 
letters just to make them visible, so don't think I'm shouting :)
I promise this is my last post this long.

<<What less important functions would you like to see deferred 
to menus? What more would you like from the transport? >>
WELL, I'D LIKE TO HAVE SOME PATTERN/SONG EDIT 
FUNCTIONS OUTSIDE, UPFRONT. DEFINITELY. AND A 
VELOCITY BUTTON THAT  IMMEDIATELY ACCESSES THE 
SENSITIVITY OF THE PADS, EXPECIALLY FOR RHYTHM 
INPUTTING.

<<Once you've gotten in the habit of saving, revert acts just like 
undo. >> YES, ALMOST. BETTER THAN NOTHING, AT LEAST. 

<<Get 1.18 software, released a few months ago. >>
WELL, THIS IS AN ISSUE HERE. I DID, BUT HOW WAS I 
SUPPOSED TO KNOW I CANT DOWNLOAD IT FROM USB? 
THE SALES REP DIDN'T TELL US, THE MANUAL DIDN'T, THE 
WEBSITE DIDN'T, ONLY BY SKIPPING THRU USER GROUPS  
WAS I ABLE TO FIGURE THAT OUT. 
AND THANK GOD I SPEAK ENGLISH WELL, WHAT ABOUT WHO 
DOESN'T? 
AND BY THE WAY, I HAVENT UPGRADED YET; I'LL DO IT 
TONITE AT HOME BRINGING A MIDIMAN INTERFACE FROM 
THE STORE. I'LL LET YOU KNOW THE RESULTS.

<<You have 999 bars worth of 16 channels of linear sequencer 
to work with in song mode.>>
ARE YOU SURE? I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT YOU 
HAVE A SINGLE TRACK TO USE AS A THREAD TO LINK ALL 
PATTERNS WITH... BUT I'LL SEE WITH THE NEW OS.
  
<<Effects routing is a hardware limitation that we're not terribly 
happy with either.  For cost reasons, this is the route we've taken. 
>> OKAY. EXCUSED. HOPE I LEARN THEM BEFORE NEXT 
CHRISTMAS.

<<128 voices, 32 midi channels, 16 knobs, 13 velocity & poly 
aftertouch sensitive pads, 6 analog outs, S/PDIF out, rugged 
quality, in this price range? >> 
PLEASE, TAKE AWAY THE POLY AFTERTOUCH AND THE 
EXTRA 16 MIDI CHANNELS AND GIVE US A WIDER GRAPHIC 
DISPLAY INSTEAD. I'M SURE NO ONE WILL COMPLAIN.
  
<<USB drivers haven't been released yet. >> 
THAT'S AN ISSUE WITH A LOT OF MANUFACTURERS IN 
RECENT YEARS, THAT THEY RELEASE UNFINISHED 
PRODUCTS AND KEEP ON POSTING OS RELEASES ON THE 
WEB. THAT IS ALLRIGHT, BUT IT HAS BECOME A  BAD HABIT 
ON THEIR PART. I REALLY THINK A PRODUCT SHOULD BE 
TESTED MUCH LONGER PRIOR TO RELEASE. I MEAN, THESE 
TOYS COST SOME MONEY.
  
<< I don't think that there are any parameters in preset edit that 
are more than a couple button pushes away. >>
WELL, ITS MORE AN ISSUE OF CRYPTIC ABBREVIATIONS AND 
THE DAMN TWO-LINE DISPLAY; YOU HAVEN'T UPGRADED 
THAT SINCE PROTEUS 1, HAVE YOU? HOWEVER, I HAVE 
KEPT FAIRLY AWAY FROM THE SYNTH ENGINE UP TO NOW, 
I'LL LOOK INTO IT SOON.
  
<<The XL-7 was not designed as a sampler.  However, you can 
buy flash ROMs that you can burn your own samples on to, and 
never have to load them from disk.  >>
YES, BUT I REALLY THINK YOU SHOULD HAVE IMPLEMENTED 
SAMPLING. EVERY GROOVE/REMIX/DANCE MACHINE 
SHOULD HAVE SAMPLING THESE DAYS. 
THE QUESTION THAT ALL MY CUSTOMERS HAVE ASKED 
ABOUT THOSE MACHINES IS "they certainly sample, don't 
they?", AND THEY ALL LEFT WITH PUZZLED EXPRESSIONS 
ON THEIR FACES. THE FLASH ROM BURNING OPTION IS 
LIMITED TO EMU SAMPLERS OWNERS, I SUPPOSE. SO MUCH 
FOR THAT.
  
<<The soundset is supposed to be different. >>
I KNOW, BUT I DO SOME CONTEMPORARY SOUND 
DESIGNING MYSELF (I helped program sounds for the 
Oberheim OB-12 virtual-analog),  I COLLABORATE WITH 
BRITISH  AND ITALIAN PRODUCERS, AND I THINK THAT 
SOUNDSET SIMPLY HAS TOO FEW "USABLE" SOUNDS, 
PLAYABLE ONES I MEAN, AND AN ABUNDANCE OF QUIRKY, 
VERY PARTICULAR AND ODD ONES. THAT'S ALL. ALSO, I'D 
HAVE EXPECTED A FRESH LOOK INTO THE NEW LOUNGE 
AND CHILL OUT SOUNDSCAPES THAT ARE TODAY'S TREND. 
IN MY OPINION, THE NATIVE MP7 SOUNDSET IS VERY 
PRINCE-Y, CIRCA 1992. 
  
<<The extensive synth programming functions interest no one 
here.>>
<<I'm surprised no one bit your head off for that comment!  =) >>
THEY DID, I DEFENDED MYSELF BY SPRAYING THEM WITH MY  
ARMPIT  CANNONS.

<<Those 16 quick-edit knobs and easy synth programming are 
two of the biggest features of the box! >> 
WELL, I DID SPEAK TOO BRASHLY THERE, MANY PEOPLE DO 
HAVE TIME TO FIDDLE AND TWIDDLE AFTER ALL. NOT ME...
 
<< I think the sequencer compares favorably to the gear I've 
played with. >> 
MMM...NO AARON, MAYBE IN THE FUTURE, BUT NOT JUST 
YET.  IT HAS GREAT POTENTIAL, BUT AS I SAID PREVIOUSLY, 
SEQUENCING GEAR I HAD TEN YEARS AGO HAD MORE 
EDITING FEATURES THAN THIS ONE. THAT INCLUDING THE 
FEATURES YOU DESCRIBED  IN OS 1.18.
YOU KNOW WHAT? THE SEQUENCER SEEMS LIKE AN 
AFTERTHOUGHT IN THIS MACHINE. LIKE IT WASN'T 
SUPPOSED TO BE THERE IN THE BEGINNING.  I MEAN, IT'S A 
GROOVEBOX, ISN'T IT? THE SEQUENCER SHOULD HAVE 
BEEN THE CORE AROUND WHICH WRAP THE OTHER 
LAYERS.  KUDOS FOR THE SYNTH ENGINE AND THE 
REALTIME CONTROLS AND THE CONSTRUCTION, BUT THE 
PROPORTION BETWEEN THOSE AND THE SEQUENCER IS 90 
TO 10.

I'll give you a bonus here. I told you I'm the premier dealer in 
music electronics in my country, right? Before that I worked at 
Manny's in NYC, you might know it. I feel I have a bit of the pulse 
of what goes and what doesn't.
If you could develop a line of genre-specific modules, with just 
the basic, quick editing functions (you know, cutoff, ADSR and 
just a few more), the few realtime knobs you have on the current 
line, only one layer per sound, FX and the rest already burned 
into the sample, maybe a 1-Rom loading capability, but a very 
specific palette of preset sounds, you'd have a winner. You'd 
have to carefully divide genres like Hardcore Techno, Trance, 
House, Lounge, Hip-Hop, Drum'n'Bass, Ambient, and such. 
They'd have to be simple, dedicated and not too programmable 
or expandable. Just reasonably priced. In your current line you 
have a couple products totally overlapping each other in my 
opinion (Audity/Orbit/XtremeLead, for instance ) and you could go 
more genre-specific even with your Roms (Beat 
Garden/Xtreme/Techno Constr. Yard also overlap each other).

I'll keep you informed on what I think about OS 1.18. If I manage 
to load it, that is.

P.S., Aaron, are you gonna be in Frankfurt? I am the importer for 
Elektron (Swedish synth and drum machine company) and 
Doepfer (German analogs) and I'm gonna be there to snatch 
Clavia and Novation too from their current importers. I'll be glad 
to look at the new keys you guys are about to release. 

Max Ventura
www.Galassia303.it
Italy.

Re: A REPLY TO AARON & OTHERS WHO BIT MY HEAD OFF : ).

2002-02-06 by mikexl7

Again just a few words.
 
 I'D LIKE TO HAVE SOME PATTERN/SONG EDIT 
> FUNCTIONS OUTSIDE, UPFRONT. DEFINITELY. AND A 
> VELOCITY BUTTON THAT  IMMEDIATELY ACCESSES THE 
> SENSITIVITY OF THE PADS, EXPECIALLY FOR RHYTHM 
> INPUTTING.

There is one and it is Quick edit #9.
> 
> <<Once you've gotten in the habit of saving, revert acts just like 
> undo. >> YES, ALMOST. BETTER THAN NOTHING, AT LEAST. 

I have to agree here why not a simple undo?
> 
> WELL, THIS IS AN ISSUE HERE. I DID, BUT HOW WAS I 
> SUPPOSED TO KNOW I CANT DOWNLOAD IT FROM USB? 
> THE SALES REP DIDN'T TELL US, THE MANUAL DIDN'T, THE 
> WEBSITE DIDN'T, ONLY BY SKIPPING THRU USER GROUPS  
> WAS I ABLE TO FIGURE THAT OUT. 

The manual also don't say anything about the USB at all.  It's like 
its not there.  It would be good to give some explanation.

.
> 
> <<You have 999 bars worth of 16 channels of linear sequencer 
> to work with in song mode.>>
> ARE YOU SURE? I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT YOU 
> HAVE A SINGLE TRACK TO USE AS A THREAD TO LINK ALL 
> PATTERNS WITH... BUT I'LL SEE WITH THE NEW OS.

It is there in all OS's.


(topic fx sends)
 >> OKAY. EXCUSED. HOPE I LEARN THEM BEFORE NEXT 
> CHRISTMAS.

It only took me a couple of days to get my head around this simple 
setup. With the level of expearence you are boasting I am suprised 
that you would say that.
> 
> <<128 voices, 32 midi channels, 16 knobs, 13 velocity & poly 
> aftertouch sensitive pads, 6 analog outs, S/PDIF out, rugged 
> quality, in this price range? >> 
> PLEASE, TAKE AWAY THE POLY AFTERTOUCH AND THE 
> EXTRA 16 MIDI CHANNELS AND GIVE US A WIDER GRAPHIC 
> DISPLAY INSTEAD. I'M SURE NO ONE WILL COMPLAIN.

One of the main reasons i bought this box it the extra outs and the 
aftertouch pads.  I would complain big time.  And yes I would like a 
larger display but I would rather have power that takes a little 
time to get used to.  I will now totaly flame you for telling me 
what I wan't in my gear.  You sould rember that you are not evryone 
so please don't tell me how I work or what I want in my gear on this 
message borad again.
>   
> <<The XL-7 was not designed as a sampler.  However, you can 
> buy flash ROMs that you can burn your own samples on to, and 
> never have to load them from disk.  >>
> YES, BUT I REALLY THINK YOU SHOULD HAVE IMPLEMENTED 
> SAMPLING. EVERY GROOVE/REMIX/DANCE MACHINE 
> SHOULD HAVE SAMPLING THESE DAYS. 
> THE QUESTION THAT ALL MY CUSTOMERS HAVE ASKED 
> ABOUT THOSE MACHINES IS "they certainly sample, don't 
> they?", AND THEY ALL LEFT WITH PUZZLED EXPRESSIONS 
> ON THEIR FACES. THE FLASH ROM BURNING OPTION IS 
> LIMITED TO EMU SAMPLERS OWNERS, I SUPPOSE. SO MUCH 
> FOR THAT.
>   
>   
> <<The extensive synth programming functions interest no one 
> here.>>
> <<I'm surprised no one bit your head off for that comment!  =) >>
> THEY DID, I DEFENDED MYSELF BY SPRAYING THEM WITH MY  
> ARMPIT  CANNONS.

I did say sompthing!

>  
> << I think the sequencer compares favorably to the gear I've 
> played with. >> 
> MMM...NO AARON, MAYBE IN THE FUTURE, BUT NOT JUST 
> YET.  IT HAS GREAT POTENTIAL, BUT AS I SAID PREVIOUSLY, 
> SEQUENCING GEAR I HAD TEN YEARS AGO HAD MORE 
> EDITING FEATURES THAN THIS ONE. THAT INCLUDING THE 
> FEATURES YOU DESCRIBED  IN OS 1.18.
> YOU KNOW WHAT? THE SEQUENCER SEEMS LIKE AN 
> AFTERTHOUGHT IN THIS MACHINE. LIKE IT WASN'T 
> SUPPOSED TO BE THERE IN THE BEGINNING.  I MEAN, IT'S A 
> GROOVEBOX, ISN'T IT? THE SEQUENCER SHOULD HAVE 
> BEEN THE CORE AROUND WHICH WRAP THE OTHER 
> LAYERS.  KUDOS FOR THE SYNTH ENGINE AND THE 
> REALTIME CONTROLS AND THE CONSTRUCTION, BUT THE 
> PROPORTION BETWEEN THOSE AND THE SEQUENCER IS 90 
> TO 10.

You just said a few lines back that you could take out 16 midi 
chanels and go with a bigger dysplay.  Is that not a part of the 
sequencer?  the edit features are a little light but the platform is 
there to have this thing blow all others away.  And as you say the 
synth is huge, in your opinion way to big to ever be used.  so there 
is a future for the box is this a bad thing?

Well thats enuf for me

later

mike

Re: [xl7] Re: A REPLY TO AARON & OTHERS WHO BIT MY HEAD OFF : ).

2002-02-06 by Jeff

On Wed, 06 Feb 2002 00:25:42 -0000, mikexl7 wrote,

> Again just a few words.
>  
>  I'D LIKE TO HAVE SOME PATTERN/SONG EDIT 
> > FUNCTIONS OUTSIDE, UPFRONT. DEFINITELY. AND A 
> > VELOCITY BUTTON THAT  IMMEDIATELY ACCESSES THE 
> > SENSITIVITY OF THE PADS, EXPECIALLY FOR RHYTHM 
> > INPUTTING.
> 
> There is one and it is Quick edit #9.

Quick edit controls modify the currently selected preset.

> ...
> > <<You have 999 bars worth of 16 channels of linear sequencer 
> > to work with in song mode.>>
> > ARE YOU SURE? I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT YOU 
> > HAVE A SINGLE TRACK TO USE AS A THREAD TO LINK ALL 
> > PATTERNS WITH... BUT I'LL SEE WITH THE NEW OS.
> 
> It is there in all OS's.

Song mode has one "pattern track", and another track that holds 16 channels
of MIDI data.  Pattern mode is limited to 32 bars.

> (topic fx sends)
>  >> OKAY. EXCUSED. HOPE I LEARN THEM BEFORE NEXT 
> > CHRISTMAS.
> 
> It only took me a couple of days to get my head around this simple 
> setup. With the level of expearence you are boasting I am suprised 
> that you would say that.

I find the limited effect send patching as frustrating as it is in the
Morpheus.

> > <<128 voices, 32 midi channels, 16 knobs, 13 velocity & poly 
> > aftertouch sensitive pads, 6 analog outs, S/PDIF out, rugged 
> > quality, in this price range? >> 
> > PLEASE, TAKE AWAY THE POLY AFTERTOUCH AND THE 
> > EXTRA 16 MIDI CHANNELS AND GIVE US A WIDER GRAPHIC 
> > DISPLAY INSTEAD. I'M SURE NO ONE WILL COMPLAIN.
> 
> One of the main reasons i bought this box it the extra outs and the 
> aftertouch pads.  I would complain big time.  And yes I would like a 
> larger display but I would rather have power that takes a little 
> time to get used to.  I will now totaly flame you for telling me 
> what I wan't in my gear.  You sould rember that you are not evryone 
> so please don't tell me how I work or what I want in my gear on this 
> message borad again.

Heh.  I could suggest that "power" and "tedium" do not necessarily have to go
hand in hand... but I won't.  ;^)

> > <<The XL-7 was not designed as a sampler.\ufffd However, you can 
> > buy flash ROMs that you can burn your own samples on to, and 
> > never have to load them from disk.\ufffd >>
> > YES, BUT I REALLY THINK YOU SHOULD HAVE IMPLEMENTED 
> > SAMPLING. EVERY GROOVE/REMIX/DANCE MACHINE 
> > SHOULD HAVE SAMPLING THESE DAYS. 
> > THE QUESTION THAT ALL MY CUSTOMERS HAVE ASKED 
> > ABOUT THOSE MACHINES IS "they certainly sample, don't 
> > they?", AND THEY ALL LEFT WITH PUZZLED EXPRESSIONS 
> > ON THEIR FACES. THE FLASH ROM BURNING OPTION IS 
> > LIMITED TO EMU SAMPLERS OWNERS, I SUPPOSE. SO MUCH 
> > FOR THAT.

I know that look.  ;)

> > <<The extensive synth programming functions interest no one 
> > here.>>
> > <<I'm surprised no one bit your head off for that comment!\ufffd =)\ufffd>>
> > THEY DID, I DEFENDED MYSELF BY SPRAYING THEM WITH MY  
> > ARMPIT  CANNONS.
> 
> I did say sompthing!

One could suggest that presets could be extensively usable, without surgery,
out of the box.  I surely would not miss the operating room (he said looking
at a rack that includes 5 other E-MU synths).

There's no doubt that it's a darn good sample playback module, but the design
of the sequencer does seem restricted by the basic architecture of the P2K.

Jeff

REPLY TO MIKEXL7

2002-02-06 by argomax2002

Mikexl7 said:

<< It only took me a couple of days to get my head around this 
simple setup. With the level of expearence you are boasting I am 
suprised  that you would say that.> > 
My level of experience goes proportionally inverse with my level 
of time available, dude.

<<One of the main reasons i bought this box it the extra outs and 
the aftertouch pads. >>
Fine; I honestly couldn't find a single application for them. Let's 
run a poll: aftertouch pads or graphic display?

<<I will now totaly flame you for telling me what I wan't in my 
gear. >>
You shouldn't be flaming nobody. Period. I said I didn't want to 
offend anybody.
 
<< synth is huge, in your opinion way to big to ever be used.  so 
there is a future for the box is this a bad thing?>>
Ok, I'll tell you my ideas about that.
Extensive ADSR and Filter/LFO features are great for simulating 
playing techniques in classic or acoustic type of sounds.
For electronic/classic synth type of sounds, I think a 
virtual-analog machine is much better. A PCM type of engine 
cannot give you that sound/smoothness/expression, no matter 
how good the waveforms or how extensive the mod matrix & 
filters. For me, it is the same as graphically comparing a random 
wave with a sine. From a distance, they might seem similar, but 
in detail, the sine is smooth, the other is rough.
For drum type of sounds, a mod matrix is overkill. None of those 
samples has the time to develop over time. 
For pop/rock/bread'n'butter type of sounds the main editing 
shortcuts (cutoff/rez, ADSR, LFO rate & wave) are usually plenty. 
Obviously I am not here to tell you you shouldn't filter a piano and 
morph it in any way you like, tremoloing with a distortion applied 
to the tail end of the filter release or whatever. 
I just meant that, for the typical average user of this kind of 
machines, this programming features are a trifle too much when 
compared to the skimpy features of the sequencer. I appreciate 
them in the P-2000, but in this machine the sequencer should 
be king. And a sampler, too.

One thing I did not mention yesterday, comparing this box with 
the competition, is that it lacks a realtime arrangement feature 
called transpose pattern; am I wrong?
And anyway, my biggest issue is that I still can't download the 
new OS into it.

Peace

Max

Re: REPLY TO MIKEXL7 > from mikexl7

2002-02-06 by mikexl7

I will start by saying that I am sorry if I rubbed you the wrong 
way.  I think I have just heard to much complaining in here about 
this box.  I know it is all for the best and is the way to get a 
more complete box.  And I will also say that I have done my fair 
share of complaining as well.  So that being said I will reply.


> << It only took me a couple of days to get my head around this 
> simple setup. With the level of expearence you are boasting I am 
> suprised  that you would say that.> > 
> My level of experience goes proportionally inverse with my level 
> of time available, dude.

Dude it is simple I am not shur why people have a hard time with it. 
Anyone who has ever used a mixer with four FX sends can just look at 
it the same way.  Look at the 16 tracks as the same thing as a 16 
chan. mixer.  you have four fx sends with a set about of mix on set 
up for A and B in the global menue and once you have things set up 
the way you like you just set fx buss in the pattern menue.  Hope 
that helps.
> 
> <<One of the main reasons i bought this box it the extra outs and 
> the aftertouch pads. >>
> Fine; I honestly couldn't find a single application for them. 
Let's  run a poll: aftertouch pads or graphic display?

Shur a poll would be find but it is done now.  I plan on using the 
pads for live use so i dont have to lug a controller keyboard 
around.  so having the aftertouch is handy and as for the second 
midi outs I find em good for a couple of things i like having my 
Roland drum head hooked up to em with my external FX to keep the 
timing as tight as I can for layering drum sounds.
> 
> <<I will now totaly flame you for telling me what I wan't in my 
> gear. >>
> You shouldn't be flaming nobody. Period. I said I didn't want to 
> offend anybody.

I hear ya there but I think it is my place to tell you when I 
dissagree with you when you take the time to tell me what I wan't 
and don't want.  You may not have wanted to offend anyone you did.
>  
> << synth is huge, in your opinion way to big to ever be used.  so 
> there is a future for the box is this a bad thing?>>
> Ok, I'll tell you my ideas about that.
> Extensive ADSR and Filter/LFO features are great for simulating 
> playing techniques in classic or acoustic type of sounds.
> For electronic/classic synth type of sounds, I think a 
> virtual-analog machine is much better. A PCM type of engine 
> cannot give you that sound/smoothness/expression, no matter 
> how good the waveforms or how extensive the mod matrix & 
> filters. For me, it is the same as graphically comparing a random 
> wave with a sine. From a distance, they might seem similar, but 
> in detail, the sine is smooth, the other is rough.
> For drum type of sounds, a mod matrix is overkill. None of those 
> samples has the time to develop over time. 

I see what you are getting at but is very good to have things like 
the LFO's for triggering/retriggering drum sounds.  As well I do use 
the filter ADSR for filtering even the shortest sounds.  It is nice 
to be able to use a filter to make a sound short rather than just 
using the amp decay.  The effect is different, soubtle but different.
I am not flaming here I am just talking about the way I do use the 
chords on the kits.  Once you get familier with the chords and the 
setup of the preset edit layers it is not a long process to get what 
you are after, as long as you know what you want.  It is easy to get 
distracted in there.

> For pop/rock/bread'n'butter type of sounds the main editing 
> shortcuts (cutoff/rez, ADSR, LFO rate & wave) are usually plenty. 
> Obviously I am not here to tell you you shouldn't filter a piano  
> and morph it in any way you like, tremoloing with a distortion    
> applied to the tail end of the filter release or whatever. 
> I just meant that, for the typical average user of this kind of 
> machines, this programming features are a trifle too much when 
> compared to the skimpy features of the sequencer. I appreciate 
> them in the P-2000, but in this machine the sequencer should 
> be king. And a sampler, too.
> 
> One thing I did not mention yesterday, comparing this box with 
> the competition, is that it lacks a realtime arrangement feature 
> called transpose pattern; am I wrong?

Nope it aint there, that would be kinda cool to have.

> And anyway, my biggest issue is that I still can't download the 
> new OS into it.

I wish I could help you out there but I know nothing about MAC's.  
That is totaly frustrating, I had some trouble with it the first 
time and it drove me nutts.  Good luck, but i dont think you will 
need luck if you have Aaron helping you.
> 
Peac 

Mike

Re: [xl7] REPLY TO MIKEXL7

2002-02-06 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com




Fine; I honestly couldn't find a single application for them. Let's
run a poll: aftertouch pads or graphic display?

>>>Display, not that it matters now anyway. <<<

One thing I did not mention yesterday, comparing this box with
the competition, is that it lacks a realtime arrangement feature
called transpose pattern; am I wrong?

>>>No, it doesn't have that feature.<<<

rEalm

Re: A REPLY TO.. and theres hope for an happy end!

2002-02-06 by heinrich22001

Sorry, long posting!

I second most of what Argomax said here.

1. Sequencer matters.  Otherwise I could easily go with the mophatt 
and save a lot of money. 
2. New ROM Cards please! The MP-7 has an overwhelming soundset in 
some areas (Drums, basses), but whats the deal with so many sampled 
cords in fifths (and not a single pianowave)? Unusable! These samples 
are outworn in a years time, the whole set is quite narrow. Then you 
call for new ROM Cards. Is there any decent bread and butter ROM Card 
that competes well with the competition? "Sounds of the ZR" is 
wonderful for pianos and some drums. The rest is below average.  
Somebody stated there is no P2500 ROM Card available - why is that?
3. The OS/GUI logic is yak! And its a mixed bag: Professional 
features way more than I need and some missing basics I would expect 
from any cheapo hardware sequencer: delete?, undo?, copy and paste of 
selected bars(!). Yes, there are workarounds: Some dedicated guys in 
this forum seem to do well with the XX-7. But to many others here it 
seems to be quite complicated leaving a lot of questions. As a hobby 
user I have to concentrate a lot on how to use this machine. (Copy a 
pattern to another destination but be aware that when editing you are 
altering the source pattern, not the destination pattern. Very 
strange!) This pulls energy you want to use for your creativity.
4. Funny bottom line:
I ended up testing the triton LE: Very clean sounding 48 bit 
sampling, pooooowwwwwerful arpeggiators (main point!), very good 
bread and butter like organs, strings, pads, brass. Amazing but cut 
down efx section (to triton, but still way more powerful than the XX-
7. Samling option. And an extremely logic and simple to use OS. Is it 
fair to compare? Yes. I was convinced to return my mp-7 and get the 
triton instead. But the funny thing is: After two nights of testing I 
raelised I will miss the mp-7. Why? It sounds more "grooving" to me. 
It may have to do with the higher note resolution (korg: 192, emu: 
384). The drum sounds are not so "clean" and beefed up with efx. If 
you want that "crunchy-punchy" sound, then you have to go with the 
EMU. Some say Emu sounds cold. I don´t think so at all. I know this 
is all subjective. I like the "organic" basic sound of my mp-7. I 
don´t know where it comes from, but EMU has it. Period. Last: No mute 
facilities liek the mp-7 for live etc. Thers a lot more but thas what 
counts for me.
To sum it up: EMU has given us a beta version of a box that could be 
king. I decided to be a faithful customer and go with EMU til the 
next OS is released. The command station is the all in one box that 
cuts it for me. I tried them all and worked with most of them. So 
please don´t let me down. 

Heinrich
 



--- In xl7@y..., "argomax2002" <argomax@g...> wrote:
> Firts of all, thanks for answering promptly.
> As I said earlier, I hope I did not offend anyone.
> I have copied/pasted  Aaron's reply and added my own in capital 
> letters just to make them visible, so don't think I'm shouting :)
> I promise this is my last post this long.
> 
> <<What less important functions would you like to see deferred 
> to menus? What more would you like from the transport? >>
> WELL, I'D LIKE TO HAVE SOME PATTERN/SONG EDIT 
> FUNCTIONS OUTSIDE, UPFRONT. DEFINITELY. AND A 
> VELOCITY BUTTON THAT  IMMEDIATELY ACCESSES THE 
> SENSITIVITY OF THE PADS, EXPECIALLY FOR RHYTHM 
> INPUTTING.
> 
> <<Once you've gotten in the habit of saving, revert acts just like 
> undo. >> YES, ALMOST. BETTER THAN NOTHING, AT LEAST. 
> 
> <<Get 1.18 software, released a few months ago. >>
> WELL, THIS IS AN ISSUE HERE. I DID, BUT HOW WAS I 
> SUPPOSED TO KNOW I CANT DOWNLOAD IT FROM USB? 
> THE SALES REP DIDN'T TELL US, THE MANUAL DIDN'T, THE 
> WEBSITE DIDN'T, ONLY BY SKIPPING THRU USER GROUPS  
> WAS I ABLE TO FIGURE THAT OUT. 
> AND THANK GOD I SPEAK ENGLISH WELL, WHAT ABOUT WHO 
> DOESN'T? 
> AND BY THE WAY, I HAVENT UPGRADED YET; I'LL DO IT 
> TONITE AT HOME BRINGING A MIDIMAN INTERFACE FROM 
> THE STORE. I'LL LET YOU KNOW THE RESULTS.
> 
> <<You have 999 bars worth of 16 channels of linear sequencer 
> to work with in song mode.>>
> ARE YOU SURE? I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT YOU 
> HAVE A SINGLE TRACK TO USE AS A THREAD TO LINK ALL 
> PATTERNS WITH... BUT I'LL SEE WITH THE NEW OS.
>   
> <<Effects routing is a hardware limitation that we're not terribly 
> happy with either.  For cost reasons, this is the route we've 
taken. 
> >> OKAY. EXCUSED. HOPE I LEARN THEM BEFORE NEXT 
> CHRISTMAS.
> 
> <<128 voices, 32 midi channels, 16 knobs, 13 velocity & poly 
> aftertouch sensitive pads, 6 analog outs, S/PDIF out, rugged 
> quality, in this price range? >> 
> PLEASE, TAKE AWAY THE POLY AFTERTOUCH AND THE 
> EXTRA 16 MIDI CHANNELS AND GIVE US A WIDER GRAPHIC 
> DISPLAY INSTEAD. I'M SURE NO ONE WILL COMPLAIN.
>   
> <<USB drivers haven't been released yet. >> 
> THAT'S AN ISSUE WITH A LOT OF MANUFACTURERS IN 
> RECENT YEARS, THAT THEY RELEASE UNFINISHED 
> PRODUCTS AND KEEP ON POSTING OS RELEASES ON THE 
> WEB. THAT IS ALLRIGHT, BUT IT HAS BECOME A  BAD HABIT 
> ON THEIR PART. I REALLY THINK A PRODUCT SHOULD BE 
> TESTED MUCH LONGER PRIOR TO RELEASE. I MEAN, THESE 
> TOYS COST SOME MONEY.
>   
> << I don't think that there are any parameters in preset edit that 
> are more than a couple button pushes away. >>
> WELL, ITS MORE AN ISSUE OF CRYPTIC ABBREVIATIONS AND 
> THE DAMN TWO-LINE DISPLAY; YOU HAVEN'T UPGRADED 
> THAT SINCE PROTEUS 1, HAVE YOU? HOWEVER, I HAVE 
> KEPT FAIRLY AWAY FROM THE SYNTH ENGINE UP TO NOW, 
> I'LL LOOK INTO IT SOON.
>   
> <<The XL-7 was not designed as a sampler.  However, you can 
> buy flash ROMs that you can burn your own samples on to, and 
> never have to load them from disk.  >>
> YES, BUT I REALLY THINK YOU SHOULD HAVE IMPLEMENTED 
> SAMPLING. EVERY GROOVE/REMIX/DANCE MACHINE 
> SHOULD HAVE SAMPLING THESE DAYS. 
> THE QUESTION THAT ALL MY CUSTOMERS HAVE ASKED 
> ABOUT THOSE MACHINES IS "they certainly sample, don't 
> they?", AND THEY ALL LEFT WITH PUZZLED EXPRESSIONS 
> ON THEIR FACES. THE FLASH ROM BURNING OPTION IS 
> LIMITED TO EMU SAMPLERS OWNERS, I SUPPOSE. SO MUCH 
> FOR THAT.
>   
> <<The soundset is supposed to be different. >>
> I KNOW, BUT I DO SOME CONTEMPORARY SOUND 
> DESIGNING MYSELF (I helped program sounds for the 
> Oberheim OB-12 virtual-analog),  I COLLABORATE WITH 
> BRITISH  AND ITALIAN PRODUCERS, AND I THINK THAT 
> SOUNDSET SIMPLY HAS TOO FEW "USABLE" SOUNDS, 
> PLAYABLE ONES I MEAN, AND AN ABUNDANCE OF QUIRKY, 
> VERY PARTICULAR AND ODD ONES. THAT'S ALL. ALSO, I'D 
> HAVE EXPECTED A FRESH LOOK INTO THE NEW LOUNGE 
> AND CHILL OUT SOUNDSCAPES THAT ARE TODAY'S TREND. 
> IN MY OPINION, THE NATIVE MP7 SOUNDSET IS VERY 
> PRINCE-Y, CIRCA 1992. 
>   
> <<The extensive synth programming functions interest no one 
> here.>>
> <<I'm surprised no one bit your head off for that comment!  =) >>
> THEY DID, I DEFENDED MYSELF BY SPRAYING THEM WITH MY  
> ARMPIT  CANNONS.
> 
> <<Those 16 quick-edit knobs and easy synth programming are 
> two of the biggest features of the box! >> 
> WELL, I DID SPEAK TOO BRASHLY THERE, MANY PEOPLE DO 
> HAVE TIME TO FIDDLE AND TWIDDLE AFTER ALL. NOT ME...
>  
> << I think the sequencer compares favorably to the gear I've 
> played with. >> 
> MMM...NO AARON, MAYBE IN THE FUTURE, BUT NOT JUST 
> YET.  IT HAS GREAT POTENTIAL, BUT AS I SAID PREVIOUSLY, 
> SEQUENCING GEAR I HAD TEN YEARS AGO HAD MORE 
> EDITING FEATURES THAN THIS ONE. THAT INCLUDING THE 
> FEATURES YOU DESCRIBED  IN OS 1.18.
> YOU KNOW WHAT? THE SEQUENCER SEEMS LIKE AN 
> AFTERTHOUGHT IN THIS MACHINE. LIKE IT WASN'T 
> SUPPOSED TO BE THERE IN THE BEGINNING.  I MEAN, IT'S A 
> GROOVEBOX, ISN'T IT? THE SEQUENCER SHOULD HAVE 
> BEEN THE CORE AROUND WHICH WRAP THE OTHER 
> LAYERS.  KUDOS FOR THE SYNTH ENGINE AND THE 
> REALTIME CONTROLS AND THE CONSTRUCTION, BUT THE 
> PROPORTION BETWEEN THOSE AND THE SEQUENCER IS 90 
> TO 10.
> 
> I'll give you a bonus here. I told you I'm the premier dealer in 
> music electronics in my country, right? Before that I worked at 
> Manny's in NYC, you might know it. I feel I have a bit of the pulse 
> of what goes and what doesn't.
> If you could develop a line of genre-specific modules, with just 
> the basic, quick editing functions (you know, cutoff, ADSR and 
> just a few more), the few realtime knobs you have on the current 
> line, only one layer per sound, FX and the rest already burned 
> into the sample, maybe a 1-Rom loading capability, but a very 
> specific palette of preset sounds, you'd have a winner. You'd 
> have to carefully divide genres like Hardcore Techno, Trance, 
> House, Lounge, Hip-Hop, Drum'n'Bass, Ambient, and such. 
> They'd have to be simple, dedicated and not too programmable 
> or expandable. Just reasonably priced. In your current line you 
> have a couple products totally overlapping each other in my 
> opinion (Audity/Orbit/XtremeLead, for instance ) and you could go 
> more genre-specific even with your Roms (Beat 
> Garden/Xtreme/Techno Constr. Yard also overlap each other).
> 
> I'll keep you informed on what I think about OS 1.18. If I manage 
> to load it, that is.
> 
> P.S., Aaron, are you gonna be in Frankfurt? I am the importer for 
> Elektron (Swedish synth and drum machine company) and 
> Doepfer (German analogs) and I'm gonna be there to snatch 
> Clavia and Novation too from their current importers. I'll be glad 
> to look at the new keys you guys are about to release. 
> 
> Max Ventura
> www.Galassia303.it
> Italy.

Re: A REPLY TO.. and theres hope for an happy end!

2002-02-06 by argomax2002

>> To sum it up: EMU has given us a beta version of a box that 
could be king. I decided to be a faithful customer and go with 
EMU til the next OS is released. The command station is the all 
in one box that cuts it for me. I tried them all and worked with 
most of them. So please don´t let me down.  
> Heinrich<<
Heinrich said it all much better than I did. I think everything is 
there. EMU's people need to take all that into account and really 
rework the OS, focusing on the sequencer, and STREAMLINE 
most operations. If that involves twistin around and re-furbishing 
everything to a wide extent, that should be done. Nothing is vital, 
in the current state of things. Please waste no more time fine 
tuning stuff like poly aftertouch curves when the sequencer and 
some OS issues are in such great need, as pointed out by 
Heinrich. You have noticed that all users agreed on the same 
issues: 
-greater sequencer editing functions like those found on Jap 
machines. don't be afraid to copy.
-a REAL undo switch (use the Compare!)
-a simpler FX routing and more FX types
-a realtime pattern transpose switch 
-more varied Rom cards (and maybe cheaper, too)
-a simpler way to download.

Re: REPLY TO MIKEXL7

2002-02-06 by heinrich22001

Let's 
run a poll: aftertouch pads or graphic display?

>>> Dissssplaayyyyy, definitely!
AND the arrangement feature! <<< 

Heinrich

Re: [xl7] Re: REPLY TO MIKEXL7

2002-02-06 by GALASSIA 303

he meant the pattern transpose in realtime.


______________________________________________
______________________________________________

GALASSIA 303
SISTEMI PER DJ E MUSICA ELETTRONICA
vendita online
HOTLINE: 199-124640  - 3 linee r.a.
ORARI: dalle 9 alle 9,  7 giorni su 7
EMAIL: argomax@...
WEB: www.galassia303.it
______________________________________________
______________________________________________

RE: [xl7] Re: A REPLY TO.. and theres hope for an happy end!

2002-02-11 by Panzare

I totally 100% agree about the soundsets that come with both the MP-7 and the XL-7. Not only that
but the ROM packs also are in the same boat. I know these are very genre specific...but with 500 to
1000 sounds you'd think Emu could include a very generic blend several dozen good basic sounds,
like piano's organ, guitar, etc. They're always nice to have. I know it sells more from their point of
view so you have to buy the specific ROMs to get the sounds you want, but in my opinion they could
use the Proteus 2500 as an example, just beef up the X-Lead or Mo-Phatts sounds for the XL-7
and the MP-7. Wayyyyyyy tooooo many similar sounds or variations there of currently on all of the
XX-7's and the ROMs for them. They need a PX-7 that has the soundsets of the 2500 but is designed
like the XL-7 and MP-7.
I agree with pretty much everything else you've seconded here except for the bit about the Triton.
Yes it is a truely awesome module, which I assume thats what your talking about, but it's also
about $600-700 more (at least) than the XL-7, MP-7 or 2500. The other route is the Korg Karma
which is very nice also, but still more expensive. The bottom line is, for the same price I don't think
there's that much out there that competes with the XX-7 series. Could be very wrong, but I haven't
been able to find it yet if there is something else. You want better, you gotta pay more.
For what it can do, it's not bad....if it was I don't think Crystal Method would be using it on tour
right now. It's not the best but for the price it ain't bad either.
-----Original Message-----
From: heinrich22001 [mailto:hhuent@...]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:11 AM
To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [xl7] Re: A REPLY TO.. and theres hope for an happy end!

Sorry, long posting!

I second most of what Argomax said here.

1. Sequencer matters. Otherwise I could easily go with the mophatt
and save a lot of money.
2. New ROM Cards please! The MP-7 has an overwhelming soundset in
some areas (Drums, basses), but whats the deal with so many sampled
cords in fifths (and not a single pianowave)? Unusable! These samples
are outworn in a years time, the whole set is quite narrow. Then you
call for new ROM Cards. Is there any decent bread and butter ROM Card
that competes well with the competition? "Sounds of the ZR" is
wonderful for pianos and some drums. The rest is below average.
Somebody stated there is no P2500 ROM Card available - why is that?
3. The OS/GUI logic is yak! And its a mixed bag: Professional
features way more than I need and some missing basics I would expect
from any cheapo hardware sequencer: delete?, undo?, copy and paste of
selected bars(!). Yes, there are workarounds: Some dedicated guys in
this forum seem to do well with the XX-7. But to many others here it
seems to be quite complicated leaving a lot of questions. As a hobby
user I have to concentrate a lot on how to use this machine. (Copy a
pattern to another destination but be aware that when editing you are
altering the source pattern, not the destination pattern. Very
strange!) This pulls energy you want to use for your creativity.
4. Funny bottom line:
I ended up testing the triton LE: Very clean sounding 48 bit
sampling, pooooowwwwwerful arpeggiators (main point!), very good
bread and butter like organs, strings, pads, brass. Amazing but cut
down efx section (to triton, but still way more powerful than the XX-
7. Samling option. And an extremely logic and simple to use OS. Is it
fair to compare? Yes. I was convinced to return my mp-7 and get the
triton instead. But the funny thing is: After two nights of testing I
raelised I will miss the mp-7. Why? It sounds more "grooving" to me.
It may have to do with the higher note resolution (korg: 192, emu:
384). The drum sounds are not so "clean" and beefed up with efx. If
you want that "crunchy-punchy" sound, then you have to go with the
EMU. Some say Emu sounds cold. I don´t think so at all. I know this
is all subjective. I like the "organic" basic sound of my mp-7. I
don´t know where it comes from, but EMU has it. Period. Last: No mute
facilities liek the mp-7 for live etc. Thers a lot more but thas what
counts for me.
To sum it up: EMU has given us a beta version of a box that could be
king. I decided to be a faithful customer and go with EMU til the
next OS is released. The command station is the all in one box that
cuts it for me. I tried them all and worked with most of them. So
please don´t let me down.

Heinrich




--- In xl7@y..., "argomax2002" wrote:
> Firts of all, thanks for answering promptly.
> As I said earlier, I hope I did not offend anyone.
> I have copied/pasted Aaron's reply and added my own in capital
> letters just to make them visible, so don't think I'm shouting :)
> I promise this is my last post this long.
>
> <> to menus? What more would you like from the transport? >>
> WELL, I'D LIKE TO HAVE SOME PATTERN/SONG EDIT
> FUNCTIONS OUTSIDE, UPFRONT. DEFINITELY. AND A
> VELOCITY BUTTON THAT IMMEDIATELY ACCESSES THE
> SENSITIVITY OF THE PADS, EXPECIALLY FOR RHYTHM
> INPUTTING.
>
> <> undo. >> YES, ALMOST. BETTER THAN NOTHING, AT LEAST.
>
> <;>
> WELL, THIS IS AN ISSUE HERE. I DID, BUT HOW WAS I
> SUPPOSED TO KNOW I CANT DOWNLOAD IT FROM USB?
> THE SALES REP DIDN'T TELL US, THE MANUAL DIDN'T, THE
> WEBSITE DIDN'T, ONLY BY SKIPPING THRU USER GROUPS
> WAS I ABLE TO FIGURE THAT OUT.
> AND THANK GOD I SPEAK ENGLISH WELL, WHAT ABOUT WHO
> DOESN'T?
> AND BY THE WAY, I HAVENT UPGRADED YET; I'LL DO IT
> TONITE AT HOME BRINGING A MIDIMAN INTERFACE FROM
> THE STORE. I'LL LET YOU KNOW THE RESULTS.
>
> <> to work with in song mode.>>
> ARE YOU SURE? I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT YOU
> HAVE A SINGLE TRACK TO USE AS A THREAD TO LINK ALL
> PATTERNS WITH... BUT I'LL SEE WITH THE NEW OS.
>
> <> happy with either. For cost reasons, this is the route we've
taken.
> >> OKAY. EXCUSED. HOPE I LEARN THEM BEFORE NEXT
> CHRISTMAS.
>
> <<128 voices, 32 midi channels, 16 knobs, 13 velocity & poly
> aftertouch sensitive pads, 6 analog outs, S/PDIF out, rugged
> quality, in this price range? >>
> PLEASE, TAKE AWAY THE POLY AFTERTOUCH AND THE
> EXTRA 16 MIDI CHANNELS AND GIVE US A WIDER GRAPHIC
> DISPLAY INSTEAD. I'M SURE NO ONE WILL COMPLAIN.
>
> <>
> THAT'S AN ISSUE WITH A LOT OF MANUFACTURERS IN
> RECENT YEARS, THAT THEY RELEASE UNFINISHED
> PRODUCTS AND KEEP ON POSTING OS RELEASES ON THE
> WEB. THAT IS ALLRIGHT, BUT IT HAS BECOME A BAD HABIT
> ON THEIR PART. I REALLY THINK A PRODUCT SHOULD BE
> TESTED MUCH LONGER PRIOR TO RELEASE. I MEAN, THESE
> TOYS COST SOME MONEY.
>
> << I don't think that there are any parameters in preset edit that
> are more than a couple button pushes away. >>
> WELL, ITS MORE AN ISSUE OF CRYPTIC ABBREVIATIONS AND
> THE DAMN TWO-LINE DISPLAY; YOU HAVEN'T UPGRADED
> THAT SINCE PROTEUS 1, HAVE YOU? HOWEVER, I HAVE
> KEPT FAIRLY AWAY FROM THE SYNTH ENGINE UP TO NOW,
> I'LL LOOK INTO IT SOON.
>
> <> buy flash ROMs that you can burn your own samples on to, and
> never have to load them from disk. >>
> YES, BUT I REALLY THINK YOU SHOULD HAVE IMPLEMENTED
> SAMPLING. EVERY GROOVE/REMIX/DANCE MACHINE
> SHOULD HAVE SAMPLING THESE DAYS.
> THE QUESTION THAT ALL MY CUSTOMERS HAVE ASKED
> ABOUT THOSE MACHINES IS "they certainly sample, don't
> they?", AND THEY ALL LEFT WITH PUZZLED EXPRESSIONS
> ON THEIR FACES. THE FLASH ROM BURNING OPTION IS
> LIMITED TO EMU SAMPLERS OWNERS, I SUPPOSE. SO MUCH
> FOR THAT.
>
> <>
> I KNOW, BUT I DO SOME CONTEMPORARY SOUND
> DESIGNING MYSELF (I helped program sounds for the
> Oberheim OB-12 virtual-analog), I COLLABORATE WITH
> BRITISH AND ITALIAN PRODUCERS, AND I THINK THAT
> SOUNDSET SIMPLY HAS TOO FEW "USABLE" SOUNDS,
> PLAYABLE ONES I MEAN, AND AN ABUNDANCE OF QUIRKY,
> VERY PARTICULAR AND ODD ONES. THAT'S ALL. ALSO, I'D
> HAVE EXPECTED A FRESH LOOK INTO THE NEW LOUNGE
> AND CHILL OUT SOUNDSCAPES THAT ARE TODAY'S TREND.
> IN MY OPINION, THE NATIVE MP7 SOUNDSET IS VERY
> PRINCE-Y, CIRCA 1992.
>
> <> here.>>
> <>
> THEY DID, I DEFENDED MYSELF BY SPRAYING THEM WITH MY
> ARMPIT CANNONS.
>
> <> two of the biggest features of the box! >>
> WELL, I DID SPEAK TOO BRASHLY THERE, MANY PEOPLE DO
> HAVE TIME TO FIDDLE AND TWIDDLE AFTER ALL. NOT ME...
>
> << I think the sequencer compares favorably to the gear I've
> played with. >>
> MMM...NO AARON, MAYBE IN THE FUTURE, BUT NOT JUST
> YET. IT HAS GREAT POTENTIAL, BUT AS I SAID PREVIOUSLY,
> SEQUENCING GEAR I HAD TEN YEARS AGO HAD MORE
> EDITING FEATURES THAN THIS ONE. THAT INCLUDING THE
> FEATURES YOU DESCRIBED IN OS 1.18.
> YOU KNOW WHAT? THE SEQUENCER SEEMS LIKE AN
> AFTERTHOUGHT IN THIS MACHINE. LIKE IT WASN'T
> SUPPOSED TO BE THERE IN THE BEGINNING. I MEAN, IT'S A
> GROOVEBOX, ISN'T IT? THE SEQUENCER SHOULD HAVE
> BEEN THE CORE AROUND WHICH WRAP THE OTHER
> LAYERS. KUDOS FOR THE SYNTH ENGINE AND THE
> REALTIME CONTROLS AND THE CONSTRUCTION, BUT THE
> PROPORTION BETWEEN THOSE AND THE SEQUENCER IS 90
> TO 10.
>
> I'll give you a bonus here. I told you I'm the premier dealer in
> music electronics in my country, right? Before that I worked at
> Manny's in NYC, you might know it. I feel I have a bit of the pulse
> of what goes and what doesn't.
> If you could develop a line of genre-specific modules, with just
> the basic, quick editing functions (you know, cutoff, ADSR and
> just a few more), the few realtime knobs you have on the current
> line, only one layer per sound, FX and the rest already burned
> into the sample, maybe a 1-Rom loading capability, but a very
> specific palette of preset sounds, you'd have a winner. You'd
> have to carefully divide genres like Hardcore Techno, Trance,
> House, Lounge, Hip-Hop, Drum'n'Bass, Ambient, and such.
> They'd have to be simple, dedicated and not too programmable
> or expandable. Just reasonably priced. In your current line you
> have a couple products totally overlapping each other in my
>; opinion (Audity/Orbit/XtremeLead, for instance ) and you could go
> more genre-specific even with your Roms (Beat
> Garden/Xtreme/Techno Constr. Yard also overlap each other).
>
> I'll keep you informed on what I think about OS 1.18. If I manage
> to load it, that is.
>
> P.S., Aaron, are you gonna be in Frankfurt? I am the importer for
> Elektron (Swedish synth and drum machine company) and
> Doepfer (German analogs) and I'm gonna be there to snatch
> Clavia and Novation too from their current importers. I'll be glad
> to look at the new keys you guys are about to release.
>
> Max Ventura
> www.Galassia303.it
> Italy.



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Re: A REPLY TO.. and theres hope for an happy end!

2002-02-12 by heinrich22001

> 
> I agree with pretty much everything else you've seconded here 
except for the
> bit about the Triton.
> Yes it is a truely awesome module, which I assume thats what your 
talking
> about, but it's also
> about $600-700 more (at least) than the XL-7, MP-7 or 2500. 

>>>>>>> The price difference between the MP-7 and the triton le 
(triton light edition, but rebrushed sounds) at my local dealer was 
around 200 dollars (450 Marks), as you know: keyboard and 64 MB 
sampling option included ;-). I think, from that aspect they are 
quite comparable. As I posted, I am going with the MP-7 for its 
grooving, punchy sound. Provided they give us a debugged OS next time.

Heinrich

RE: [xl7] Re: A REPLY TO.. and theres hope for an happy end!

2002-02-12 by Panzare

Not sure what the price there is but you can find good deals on MP-7's and
XL-7's here in
the states for less than a $1,000.00. The cheapest, other than E-Bay, I've
been able to find
a new Triton Rack Module for is around $1599.00.

It's possible the Triton is less expensive in other countries, and the
E-MU's are more expensive,
I don't know but thats the info I was basing my comments on.

jp
  -----Original Message-----
  From: heinrich22001 [mailto:hhuent@...]
  Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 9:14 AM
  To: xl7@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [xl7] Re: A REPLY TO.. and theres hope for an happy end!


  >
  > I agree with pretty much everything else you've seconded here
  except for the
  > bit about the Triton.
  > Yes it is a truely awesome module, which I assume thats what your
  talking
  > about, but it's also
  > about $600-700 more (at least) than the XL-7, MP-7 or 2500.

  >>>>>>> The price difference between the MP-7 and the triton le
  (triton light edition, but rebrushed sounds) at my local dealer was
  around 200 dollars (450 Marks), as you know: keyboard and 64 MB
  sampling option included ;-). I think, from that aspect they are
  quite comparable. As I posted, I am going with the MP-7 for its
  grooving, punchy sound. Provided they give us a debugged OS next time.

  Heinrich


  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.